• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ministers decide, civil servants advice. To what extent is this still true of the modern civil service?

Extracts from this document...


'Ministers decide, civil servants advice'. To what extent is this still true of the modern civil service? The relationship between the ministers and civil servants can be explained in Kevin Theakston's four models. The relationship should be The Formal Constitutional model. It states that civil servants serve their ministers, they provide the necessary information but have to be impartial or neutral, anonymous and permanence. However, this isn't the case, there are three models that outline what could be. Adversarial model, this outlines that ministers and civil servant are in a struggle for power, also that the civil service has its own agenda and making it suit best for them and it wants to obstruct government. Village life in the Whitehall community model. Ministers provide the vision to get funding or the subject their fighting on whilst civil servants fill in the detail based upon their knowledge and experience of what has worked in the past, this provides them with understanding on how to use policies to get what is needed. ...read more.


It is said that civil servants are not servants at all but masters, Tony Benn said that the civil service has it's own agenda and can a lot of influence over new ministers. There are some objectives that obstruct ministers. Civil servant control information that goes to the ministers and therefore can manipulate what to tell the ministers. Giving ministers a lack of information or an overwhelming amount of paperwork. Ministers have other commitments, such as Parliament might delay their work. Ministers may be outnumbered by their civil servants with as high as 10 to 1. Civil servants, in or out of their department, can have informal gatherings and decide what to say to their minister, and watch ministers fail. Overwhelming work load can make a minister feel that they have been cut off from reality outside their departments. Ministers can decide to go 'native' and nothing will be done. ...read more.


They have two major roles. They help to make government less reliant and more independent on the work of the civil service. They also help the Prime Minister keep up to date on what is happening in departments. They play a key role in government. Labour used a lot of special advisers from 1997 by 2003 hundred and eight, twenty-seven prime ministerial and eighty-one government advisers, with only five in 1990. They face a lot of criticism in the way they serve political-party. As they are funded by the taxpayer. They got known as Spin Doctors. They had conflicting objectives, there was a lot of scandals involving special advisers in the 1990s and party's promise to stick to policies they have already made. It said that the party was spinning out of control. A famous example of problems with a special adviser would be Jo Moore. She is Stephen Byers' media advisor. She said 'good day to bury bad news'. On the day of the 9/11. She had to later on apologise for sending such an email and eventually in time, resigned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. How are party's funded?

    An obvious disadvantage is that State funding would be very expensive to the tax payer. Tax payers would argue that they are paying for parties that they are against. It would be difficult for parties to agree a funding formula that is seen as acceptable for all parties.

  2. To what extent are judges neutral and independent?

    Firstly, the arguments for judicial neutrality. It is important that our judges are neutral as otherwise (in their job as mediators and deciders) justice and any decisions they make based on the characteristics of a person will be unfair (it is for precisely this reason that previous criminal convictions are not allowed as evidence in a court case).

  1. "To what extent have west European prime ministers full control of their cabinets? Discuss ...

    In addition, the United Kingdom cabinet consist of more than twenty departments each department serve its own needs, such as the defence, education, transport, foreign Secretary and health. In Western European states the "political chief executive" is the person on charge of national policy This title has many different translations

  2. Evaluate the above statement and consider the extent to which you think it is ...

    be obeyed, unlike the constitutional laws of states bound by a codified Constitution in which there is a long and complex procedure for the amendment Constitutional legislation4. Rather than an exhaustive body of such legislation, the British constitutional arrangement consists of a combination of statutory instruments which are subject to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work