• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Of the following: Parliament, Ombudsmen, UK Courts, European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, which body is the most effective at redressing grievances, and why?

Extracts from this document...


Of the following: Parliament, Ombudsmen, UK Courts, European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, which body is the most effective at redressing grievances, and why? The different bodies of the UK and Europe have their individual ways of redressing grievances. In the UK, the link between Parliament and Ombudsmen is quite significant; in that the way Parliament redresses grievances is through the Parliamentary Ombudsman (officially known as the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration). The European Courts are connected to the European Ombudsman, whose job shall be outlined later. Each institution is equally effective at redressing grievances, although it seems that the European Ombudsman has greater effect. The reasons for this shall be summarized below. The European Court of Justice is an institution of the European Union and is situated in Luxembourg. It is not to be confused with the European Court of Human Rights. Except when in its judicial role, the court helps to resolve disputes between member states, the European Union and member states, individuals and the European Union or between the institutions of the European Union. Since 1952, more than 8,600 cases have been presented to the court. To deal with the increasing number of cases more rapidly and therefore more effectively, the court appealed to the European Parliament to allow them to create another judicial body. ...read more.


Moving on to the UK court system, we have two main parts; the civil courts and the criminal courts. Both courts are arranged in order of hierarchically. To start with the civil courts by beginning with the County Courts - here minor cases such as divorces and tenant disagreements are seen. They progress to the High Court if disputes are of a higher value than �5,000 in claims/damages. Within the High Court is the Divisional Court of Queens Bench Division, which deals with cases referred from the County Courts. Next is the Family Division, which deals with the family and legal side of personal relations. The third part of the High Court is the Chancery Division, which deals with taxation and wills. Any appeals go to the House of Lords - the highest court in the Civil Courts. The process of dealing with a compliant through the Civil Courts is long and expensive. It takes a long period of time to process all complaints, and then to determine whether they are in need of a hearing. The outcome is not always what the victim expects, so their time and money feels wasted. However, the Civil Courts are probably the best place to go to if you have been a victim of any of the aforementioned criteria. ...read more.


However, as the case study shows, when the public do have knowledge of the system, it can become very useful. The advice is free and confidential and all investigations are private. He can cover a wide range of public bodies and in many cases his recommendations are implemented so everyone gets something from it. Whereas this system would appear to be highly effective, statistics show that less than a quarter of the complaints made to the Ombudsman turn into investigations. From studying the different ways in which various bodies in the UK and Europe redress grievances, there seems to be no particular body that stands out as being the most effective, but merely one that has more effect than others. Where the European Courts independently have different courts that deal with complaints, and the UK has the Parliamentary Ombudsman and the two Courts which deal with complaints towards both governmental and personal affairs, the most effective in the way it deals with people is the European Ombudsman. He can be reached directly and without the fuss of have to go through an MP. This is not saying that the other systems do not have their merits, or that the European Ombudsman doesn't have his drawbacks, but that as a "user-friendly" system and the speed at which his replies are sent seem to prove that he is the man. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The European Union and UK Businesses

    3 star(s)

    the other chain would carry out extensive methods to make sure that Tesco cannot block them moving into the United Kingdom. The Single European Act (1986) Jacques Delors, president of the European Commission, summarised the main objectives of the Single European Act in the following way: "The Single Act means,

  2. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    Some political writers make a clear division and state that in "...spite of spreading integration, membership of the EU has little impact on the way government actually works in Britain."21 This concisely provides a counter argument. The reason justify this point is that the "...Union has no direct administration of

  1. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    By 1973 more countries joined the treaty of Rome and these are United Kingdom, Denmark, Republic of Ireland and more. The main purpose of this treaty is: *The removal of trade barriers between member nations *Freedom of movement of capital, labour, and entrepreneurship across borders.

  2. Evaluate the features of Toyota UK Burnaston

    Another resolution to this problem is to move Toyota Burnaston out of The UK being at an advantage to Toyota's corporate objectives but a threat to Burnaston. They could move Burnaston to another country inside the EU e.g. Poland where wages are much lower but maybe sacrificing the quality workforce that has been established in the UK.

  1. How important is the European Parliament?

    good as the ability to dismiss a Commissioner, and had the Santer Commission not resigned the EP would have the ultimate power to dismiss the incompetent Commission. The EP does not have a government and therefore can be seen as less important in relation to other EU institutions, if one

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    We have already noted the terse and scathing judgment of the Commission as to the measures which were to give effect to this provision. Much emphasis is placed, in both Commission and Council Reports on the evolutive nature of the concept as indicated in Article 8e.

  1. The European Community and ECJ

    In their defence, they claimed that the UK law was contrary to Art 28(ex 30). The ECJ held that the prohibition had fell within the grounds of Art 30 (ex 36) and it was upon the MS to determine the standards of morality within its territory.

  2. Critically examine the merits and defects of the various approaches to dealing with environmental ...

    For example, Germany is one of the world leaders in recycling, therefore how can a country like Greece achieve similar standards of recycling to them. This then puts the emphasis back on national Governments to set their standards within EU minimum and maximum limits.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work