• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Of the following: Parliament, Ombudsmen, UK Courts, European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, which body is the most effective at redressing grievances, and why?

Extracts from this document...


Of the following: Parliament, Ombudsmen, UK Courts, European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, which body is the most effective at redressing grievances, and why? The different bodies of the UK and Europe have their individual ways of redressing grievances. In the UK, the link between Parliament and Ombudsmen is quite significant; in that the way Parliament redresses grievances is through the Parliamentary Ombudsman (officially known as the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration). The European Courts are connected to the European Ombudsman, whose job shall be outlined later. Each institution is equally effective at redressing grievances, although it seems that the European Ombudsman has greater effect. The reasons for this shall be summarized below. The European Court of Justice is an institution of the European Union and is situated in Luxembourg. It is not to be confused with the European Court of Human Rights. Except when in its judicial role, the court helps to resolve disputes between member states, the European Union and member states, individuals and the European Union or between the institutions of the European Union. Since 1952, more than 8,600 cases have been presented to the court. To deal with the increasing number of cases more rapidly and therefore more effectively, the court appealed to the European Parliament to allow them to create another judicial body. ...read more.


Moving on to the UK court system, we have two main parts; the civil courts and the criminal courts. Both courts are arranged in order of hierarchically. To start with the civil courts by beginning with the County Courts - here minor cases such as divorces and tenant disagreements are seen. They progress to the High Court if disputes are of a higher value than �5,000 in claims/damages. Within the High Court is the Divisional Court of Queens Bench Division, which deals with cases referred from the County Courts. Next is the Family Division, which deals with the family and legal side of personal relations. The third part of the High Court is the Chancery Division, which deals with taxation and wills. Any appeals go to the House of Lords - the highest court in the Civil Courts. The process of dealing with a compliant through the Civil Courts is long and expensive. It takes a long period of time to process all complaints, and then to determine whether they are in need of a hearing. The outcome is not always what the victim expects, so their time and money feels wasted. However, the Civil Courts are probably the best place to go to if you have been a victim of any of the aforementioned criteria. ...read more.


However, as the case study shows, when the public do have knowledge of the system, it can become very useful. The advice is free and confidential and all investigations are private. He can cover a wide range of public bodies and in many cases his recommendations are implemented so everyone gets something from it. Whereas this system would appear to be highly effective, statistics show that less than a quarter of the complaints made to the Ombudsman turn into investigations. From studying the different ways in which various bodies in the UK and Europe redress grievances, there seems to be no particular body that stands out as being the most effective, but merely one that has more effect than others. Where the European Courts independently have different courts that deal with complaints, and the UK has the Parliamentary Ombudsman and the two Courts which deal with complaints towards both governmental and personal affairs, the most effective in the way it deals with people is the European Ombudsman. He can be reached directly and without the fuss of have to go through an MP. This is not saying that the other systems do not have their merits, or that the European Ombudsman doesn't have his drawbacks, but that as a "user-friendly" system and the speed at which his replies are sent seem to prove that he is the man. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The European Union and UK Businesses

    3 star(s)

    to operate in all the countries and is able to set up in these countries, Tesco can then move staff that are specialised in one particular area. For example when Tesco was setting up in France they could move staff out there that could speak French, this would benefit Tesco

  2. "How was the doctrine of supremacy developed by the European Court of Justice, and ...

    - The organs and constituent bodies of the member states, including the legislative, executive and judiciary, are fully responsible for reversing the effects of violations of EU law, which affect individuals. This may, for example, involve the courts ordering the government to pay damages for loss caused by breach of

  1. Disneyland Resort Paris, Case Study

    Park Asterix and Terra Mitica. Do you think that Disney Studios will attract more Germans than other park? Considering the fact that the Studios were opened in 2001, this hasn't shown an improvement on attendance of German visitors to the Park.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    Empowering the European Parliament is no solution and could -- to the extent that it weakens the Council (the voice of the Member States) -- actually exacerbate the legitimacy problem of the Community. On this view, a parliament without a demos is conceptually impossible, practically despotic.

  1. The concept of Parliamentary sovereignty means Parliament is the supreme legal authority in the ...

    term; it's purpose is to advise the Council of Ministers on commission proposals. In the late 20th and early 21st Century, the constitutional principle of Parliamentary supremacy underwent erosion. The erosion has been connected with Institutions of the European Union, in particular the European Court of Justice that asserts the power to exercise judicial review over the UK law.

  2. An examination of British policy with regard to European Unity during the period 1945 ...

    The accepted view was that "Britain should not surrender the ultimate decisions of foreign policy or economic affairs to any organization or parliamentary body which she could neither control nor veto" (Baumann, 1959: 352). Here in lies a fear and insecurity with regard to power and control; the fear that

  1. How important is the European Parliament?

    The EP could, here, have rejected the entire commission as they had similarly threatened to do over the Santer Commission's fraud crisis. After a possible "vote of censure", the Santer commission resigned. The EP represents citizen's views and protects their civil liberties by making sure that each Commissioner does its

  2. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    The negative effect of being part of the EU is that citizens of other member states are able to enter Britain for work purposes. Additionally, identical entitlements are given to British citizens entering other European countries. However, on a positive not, the improved working conditions have been the result of the European Union's jurisdiction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work