• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Of the following: Parliament, Ombudsmen, UK Courts, European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, which body is the most effective at redressing grievances, and why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Of the following: Parliament, Ombudsmen, UK Courts, European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, which body is the most effective at redressing grievances, and why? The different bodies of the UK and Europe have their individual ways of redressing grievances. In the UK, the link between Parliament and Ombudsmen is quite significant; in that the way Parliament redresses grievances is through the Parliamentary Ombudsman (officially known as the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration). The European Courts are connected to the European Ombudsman, whose job shall be outlined later. Each institution is equally effective at redressing grievances, although it seems that the European Ombudsman has greater effect. The reasons for this shall be summarized below. The European Court of Justice is an institution of the European Union and is situated in Luxembourg. It is not to be confused with the European Court of Human Rights. Except when in its judicial role, the court helps to resolve disputes between member states, the European Union and member states, individuals and the European Union or between the institutions of the European Union. Since 1952, more than 8,600 cases have been presented to the court. To deal with the increasing number of cases more rapidly and therefore more effectively, the court appealed to the European Parliament to allow them to create another judicial body. ...read more.

Middle

Moving on to the UK court system, we have two main parts; the civil courts and the criminal courts. Both courts are arranged in order of hierarchically. To start with the civil courts by beginning with the County Courts - here minor cases such as divorces and tenant disagreements are seen. They progress to the High Court if disputes are of a higher value than �5,000 in claims/damages. Within the High Court is the Divisional Court of Queens Bench Division, which deals with cases referred from the County Courts. Next is the Family Division, which deals with the family and legal side of personal relations. The third part of the High Court is the Chancery Division, which deals with taxation and wills. Any appeals go to the House of Lords - the highest court in the Civil Courts. The process of dealing with a compliant through the Civil Courts is long and expensive. It takes a long period of time to process all complaints, and then to determine whether they are in need of a hearing. The outcome is not always what the victim expects, so their time and money feels wasted. However, the Civil Courts are probably the best place to go to if you have been a victim of any of the aforementioned criteria. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, as the case study shows, when the public do have knowledge of the system, it can become very useful. The advice is free and confidential and all investigations are private. He can cover a wide range of public bodies and in many cases his recommendations are implemented so everyone gets something from it. Whereas this system would appear to be highly effective, statistics show that less than a quarter of the complaints made to the Ombudsman turn into investigations. From studying the different ways in which various bodies in the UK and Europe redress grievances, there seems to be no particular body that stands out as being the most effective, but merely one that has more effect than others. Where the European Courts independently have different courts that deal with complaints, and the UK has the Parliamentary Ombudsman and the two Courts which deal with complaints towards both governmental and personal affairs, the most effective in the way it deals with people is the European Ombudsman. He can be reached directly and without the fuss of have to go through an MP. This is not saying that the other systems do not have their merits, or that the European Ombudsman doesn't have his drawbacks, but that as a "user-friendly" system and the speed at which his replies are sent seem to prove that he is the man. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The European Union and UK Businesses

    3 star(s)

    There are however disadvantages with this law as it means that if there was another large supermarket chain that existed in the EU, this would mean that Tesco's UK operations could be threatened by another large chain, this would be mean that Tesco would now have to start competing with

  2. An Analysis of the Powers of the European Parliament.

    was substantially different from that which the EP had given its opinion on10. However should Parliament fail to respond it cannot complain that its views have not been taken into account11. The Council cannot come to a final decision without giving the EP an opportunity to respond it does not have to suspend discussion until it recieve their opinion12.

  1. How important is the European Parliament?

    As EU citizens, one must wonder why our representative is unelected, and not even a part of the elected body; a figure like the Speaker of the House of Commons. This will be addressed through the Lisbon Treaty, if and when it becomes law, by the appointment of a 6-year-term President of the EU.

  2. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    These range from big issues such as the regulation of competition and the recognition of trade unions, to even small things such as the packaging of products. The second topic which illustrates the Europeanisation is the process of government, which looks at the growing fusion of the British government and the European Union.

  1. Evaluate the features of Toyota UK Burnaston

    is just another example of the European & UK market Demand for the Cheaper domestically produced cars, which Toyota Burnaston cannot meet the criteria for due to its high wages & running cost created by its location. The main problem with competitors that the European market will not be affected

  2. can the European Parliament be regarded as an effective legislative

    The other way in which the European parliament can formally put forward legislation is to have reports that the parliament itself initiates. This means that the parliament can act as quite an effective legislative body with the power to put forward its own ideas.

  1. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    How are we to define the relationships among them. A demos, a people cannot, after all be a bunch of strangers. How should we understand, then, and define the peoplehood of the European demos if we insist that the task remains the ...

  2. The concept of Parliamentary sovereignty means Parliament is the supreme legal authority in the ...

    The European Commission consists of 20 members chosen from various countries to work as civil servants who serve the community. It proposes EU policies and presents draft legislation to the Council. The European Parliament is made up of elected representatives from constituencies across the European Union for a fixed five-year

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work