• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline how and why federalism has changed since the 1960s.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Page 1 of 2 Outline how and why federalism has changed since the 1960s. In the 1960s, the government had a creative federalist approach. The aim of Lynden Johnson's Great society programmes was to try to eliminate poverty within the US. This in turn meant large government grants were given to states, which was seen to increase the level of interference from the federal government. Johnson also provided categorical grants instead of block grants, which meant the states had much less control over their spending. He also supplied a lot of federal aid, increasing the dependence of states on the federal government. It wasn't just the executive increasing the role; the judiciary were also pushing the government this way, with cases such as Gideon vs. Wainwright and Miranda vs. Arizona. Since the 1960's the some have stated that New Federalism has been the main objective of the executive and judiciary due to the previous creative federalism. From the 1970s there was an ideological shift, with the rejection of liberal values from the 1960s. President Nixon started the development of the idea that the federal government was too powerful, and that the states needed to have more power of their local rights. ...read more.

Middle

The limits on his policies also showed that Dual federalism was too impractical to actually implement. During Bush Snr's presidency, there was a lot more emphasis on foreign policy which required the increase in size of the federal government. Also during his presidency, the Supreme Court started to make decisions that leant towards state rights; the political layout of the courts took longer to change than the executive due to life tenure of the justices meaning a President could just just swap them for more sympathetic judges. The atmosphere mainly created by Reagan of dual federalism was accelerated through Clinton's presidency. Like President Carter and Bush Snr, Clinton was previously a governor, and believed that governors should have freedom to decide what was in the best interests of their states. Many Supreme Court decisions made in these years also started to give more rights to the states. For example in New York vs. Unites states, the court ruled that the federal government could not instruct a state what to do with radioactive material. Also in Pritz vs. United States, the court ruled that Congress could not instruct states to carry out background checks on people buying handguns, as it was a matter for the states to decide rather than for the federal government. ...read more.

Conclusion

He may arguably further the concept of government intervention with policies similar to affirmative action, since he is a very left wing democrat, and also is being accused of being socialistic by some Americans in his approaches. The controversial issue of Medicare has also been another example of huge federal spending. In conclusion, the United States seems to vary in its size of federal government. For many Americans the ideal solution may never be reached, as it was to close to the ideas of the articles of confederation and was proven to have not worked. In the view of these stated rights idealists, Washington DC's government has far too much power, and that their constitutional safe guards against the concentration of power in central government are inadequate. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that even committed states rights activists such as Ronald Reagan, can only slow down the process of centralisation of power in the modern era, rather than reverse it. However from the opposite view point the centralisation hasn't gone far enough, with the argument that there is too much disparity between the rights given in each state. The debate of the US federal system is an ongoing debate, and many compromises will have to be met, as there is no clear answer with a large variety of political viewpoints across the United States of America. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Overall this is a very good essay. Although the essay is chronological, which is often not the best way to answer questions, here, the way the question is worded, leads towards an answer of this nature. To improve, more is needed at the start about what federalism actually is and why it is controversial. More theories as to why federalism has changed could also be included.

Marked by teacher Jessica Jung 19/02/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    If there is a conflict between any ordinary law and a constitutional law, the latter must prevail. At this point the Supreme Court was empowered with judicial review. This meant it could review any decision made by any part of government (apart from constitutional amendments) and deem them unconstitutional.

  2. How effective are the checks and balances of the Constitution today?

    The Senate can approve or reject the proposal of treaties, the rejection of the Treaty of Versailles is probably one of the biggest uses of this power, but with only six other minor treaties being rejected since, this power is becoming less effective in checking the executive, and the President seems to be dominant in international affairs.

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    This criticism has led to a number of changes in UK constitutional practice, seeing an increase in power of departmental Select Committees, devolved assemblies and regional and local referendums, all of which are designed to reduce executive power and de-centralise decision-making.

  2. Examine the effectiveness of the checks and balances system of the American Government. and ...

    (In the United Kingdom, 18 out of 22 General Elections since 1922 have produced a majority government.) FPTP generates a strong, stable and single-party government who are able to carry through their election manifesto during their time in office. This electoral system also provides a simple mechanism to vote a

  1. Do the strengths of the US constitution outweigh its weaknesses?

    For example the Brown V Board of Education 1954, set out to deal with the segregation of Black African Americans from the rest of society via the Bill of Rights which is written into the constitution. Due to this court ruling a precedent has been since set, and many people

  2. Is the USA still a federal state?

    Additionally in relation to national security, spending dramatically increased from $290 million to $651 million between 2001 and 2009 and the Patriot Act resulted in a string of legislation that would significantly affect the conduct of security measures from in the USA affecting the lifestyles of all.

  1. The power of the President is limited to the power to persuade. Discuss.

    For instance, despite the President?s ?special and pronounced? powers in regards to foreign policy, he still requires the support of Congress before declaring war or signing treaties. This has led to anomalies such as the Vietnam War, which was never really a war; and the Treaty of Versailles, which was

  2. How effectively do the three branches of the federal government check each other?

    The Senate must approve such appointments. The framers of the Constitution originally felt that the Legislative branch would be the most powerful. However, it was Chief Justice John Marshall who greatly expanded the power of the Supreme Court in Marbury vs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work