• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate and the House of Representatives

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate and the House of Representatives. What advantages did the framers of the constitution see in creating these differences? Do they continue to be advantageous or problematical in modern America? This essay will discuss the stated electoral systems, their purposes with regards to the framers of the constitution and their problems as three separate entities. As with any political system, problems with the issues of representation are inevitable. The problems of the electoral system in the US are clearly illustrated with the current Presidential elections but this will be discussed later in the essay. The concept of divided government and questions of popular mandate as well as the deviation from the original ideals and intentions of the constitution's framers will be discussed also. This essay will also explore the link between these three separate entities. Firstly, to tackle the issue of Presidential election. The population does not directly elect the presidency; an electoral college elects it. Each state plus the District of Columbia, has a number of members in the Electoral College equal to the number of congressmen and senators representing it. The President is voted for every four years and it is down to the individual states to decide how their Electoral College votes are cast. ...read more.

Middle

The two-year term was seen as a way of ensuring this, as the voters are unlikely to forgive and forget any major grievances that they had with a representative, in such a short time. As James Madison explains in 'Federalist No.57': "The elective mode of obtaining rulers is the characteristic policy of republican government. The means relied on this form of government for preventing their degeneracy are numerous and various. The most effectual one is such a limitation of the term of appointments as will maintain a proper responsibility to the people."8 The idea was that those elected to the House of Representatives would be directly responsible to the voters who put them there. It is worth noting though, that the framers concept of the voting franchise was much different than that of today. Native Americans, Blacks and women of any race were excluded from the franchise.9 This is also tied in with the other constitutional idea of no taxation without actual representation; this leads to virtual representation10, which is when those who actually vote are also seen to be voting for those who do not, either by right or by choice. So it can be seen that the framers' design of the voting system for the lower house was put in place to ensure that the section of government they saw as having the most popular influence in the republic, would be directly accountable to the people who had voted for them. ...read more.

Conclusion

The framers wished to avoid majoritarianism and the idea of partisan politics by creating a system of government based on the revolutionary idea, at the time, of republicanism but, with the political mood changing, the ideals of democracy have become prevalent and the changes in the electoral system are an essential and necessary part of this. 1 Asher, H.B.(1998). Presidential Elections and American Politics. (4th Ed.). USA. The Dorsey Press. P 315 2 Congressional Quarterly. (1997). Presidential Elections 1789-1996. Washington D.C. Congressional Quarterly Inc. p7 3 Kelly,A.H.(et al). (1983). The American Constitution. Its Origins and Development.(6th Ed).London. WW Norton & Co. p101. 4 Congressional Quarterly. (1997).p1 5 Asher. (1988).p317 6 McKeever, R. (et al). (1999). Politics USA. Essex. Prentice Hall.p190 7 Herrnson, P.S. (1995). Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington D.C. Congressional Quarterly Inc.p7 8 James Madison. Federalist No.57 in Lasser, W. (2000). Perspectives on American Politics. Boston. Houghton Mifflin.p274-5. 9 Mary Frances Berry in Arrington, K.G. (et al). (1992). Voting Rights in America: Continuing the Quest for Full Participation. Michigan. Leadership Conference Education Fund.p64 10 Kelly. (et al). (1983).p78 11 Davies, P.J. (1992) Elections USA. Manchester. Manchester University Press.p154 12 Mckeever. (et al). (1999).p184 13 Abramowitz, A.I. & Segal, J.A. (1995). Senate Elections. Michigan. University of Michigan Press.p10 14 McKeever (et al). (1999).p185 15 Abramowitz & Segal. (1995).p21 16 McKeever (et al). (1999).p185 17 Abramowitz & Segal. (1995).p228 ?? ?? ?? ?? Stuart Cole Mike Dawkins 1 POLI 3020 Government & Politics of the USA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the view that the arguments for having an electoral college to elect the ...

    5 star(s)

    Electoral College votes than they should receive according to the popular vote. In 1968, for instance, a North Carolina elector should have voted for Richard Nixon; instead they cast a vote for George Wallace. In the end, Nixon won the state but the case is all the more alarming in

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the claim that the Senate is far more powerful than the House of ...

    3 star(s)

    Bill Frist who became majority leader in The Senate after only 8 years, whilst it took Nancy Pelosi 16 years to become minority leader in The House of Representatives. The Senate is also more powerful as it is often seen as a recruiting post for Presidents and Vice Presidents e.g.

  1. Federalism essay

    to the next, but that it universally thought that the United States is the prime example of a federal state. He concludes by saying: "By the federal principle I mean the method of dividing powers so that the general and regional governments are each, within a sphere, co-ordinate and independent.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    Who would in turn appoint their personal choices to the judiciary, consequently destabilizing the Checks and Balances system, organized different elections for the different branches and members, with particular dates and criteria. Having a sound Constitution is one thing but protecting its fundamentals is another.

  1. To what extent is the American Constitution an elitist document?Why then did the framers ...

    This war lasted until 1783, when the British granted independence to each of the thirteen colonies. Each of the thirteen states were now independent and bound together under a loose agreement called the Articles of Confederation (AOC). The Articles of Confederation provided for a unicameral legislature with each state being

  2. The Electoral College

    The Electoral College is not democratic. It has been specially designed so that each state has a way of being heard in an election no matter how large or small it is. Many people argue that the national elections should be run the same way as state elections, but Thomas

  1. Assess the significance of race, gender and religion as factors influencing US voting behaviour. ...

    fact, quite the opposite; their staple voter is a white, Anglo-Saxon protestant. In the 2008 presidential election, 55% of whites of both genders voted for McCain, the Republican nominee. In 2004 this figure was even higher, at 58%. As polarisation of the parties increases, Younge suggests that an ?already significant

  2. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    In 1997, the Supreme Court declared the Communications Decency Act unconstitutional, following the case of Reno v American Civil Liberties Union. In Clinton v New York City (1998), it declared the Line Item Veto Act unconstitutional. The judiciary can also declare actions of any member of the executive branch to be unconstitutional.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work