• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Marxist View of History

Extracts from this document...


Liz Ford 13R3 Outline the Marxist View of History History, according to Marx, was based on class conflict between the proletariat workers and the bourgeoisie capitalists, those who produced, and those who owned the means of production. It is in accordance with this theory that Marx's 'scientific' ideology of communism developed. According to Marx, all nations moved through distinct phases and the result of all of these phases was ultimately communism. Marx uses Hegel's idea of the dialectic to explain why changes in history happen. In Hegel's view, there are two conflicting ideas (eg: Slaves and Owners) which cannot exist side by side but instead of one dominating the other, a new idea is born from the two. Marx views history as being an inevitable process. As under each system (except for communism) there is conflict, according to the dialectic, a new system must be born. So as the conflicts within feudalism synthesised to form capitalism, so the conflicts within capitalism synthesised to form socialism. Each system was the product of its predecessor's destruction but each system would also ultimately hold the key to its own destruction. The aspects of each system whish were necessary to maintain it, eg: slavery in the Empire stage, contributed to that systems destruction. The first stage identified is that of 'primitive communism'. In this system there was no 'specialisation', all the members of the tribe could do all the jobs. ...read more.


are the slaves and their Roman owners. It is from this conflict that the synthesis of the next stage in human history was born. Feudalism is the third stage identified by Marx. Relying on a heavily ordered society where everyone knew their place the idea of a simple system of class division had disappeared. Instead one class 'owning' another the new system worked by classes working for one another, and example would be that the peasants worked for the knights and in return the knights protected the peasants. This system was fine while the main class division was between the 'upper' and 'lower' classes with little in between, but the emergence of the middle classes saw conflict. This time it was between the new middle classes and the old upper classes, the new middle classes wanted more power and influence while the upper class wanted to retain the privileges it had accumulated. In the feudal system, the people who had power and influence were also those who owned land ie: the means of production. This conflict between the upper and lower classes over land and power caused a new system to come into place which Marx identified as capitalism. Under capitalism, the bourgeoisie created systems of fake democracy which made it seem as though everyone had an equal share in power but in fact concentrated power in the hands of those owning capital ie: factories. ...read more.


There would therefore be no dialectic at this stage of history. It is important to note the times in which Marx's theory of history was written. Created in the mid-nineteenth century when the industrial revolution was at its peak, the flaws of capitalism were obvious. Marx was unaware of the way in which capitalism could change to a system where there was less class conflict. At the time he was writing, that capitalism would cause its own downfall was a logical conclusion. People have criticised the way in which Marx made his theory one of inevitability, that one stage would cause another until the inevitable fall of the state and the emergence of world communism, but they are looking with the benefit of hindsight. In short, Marx's view of history is one of class conflict. He believes that every type of political system will ultimately cause its own demise due to the dialectic within each system caused by the class conflict within the system. Marx believes that class conflict is caused less by people wanting power and more by a conflict between those who have the means of production and those who do not. Every society which differentiates between groups of people will have class conflict and this will inevitably lead to a new system with a different type of conflict. The only exception to this system is communism because it has no classes. As all citizens in communism own the means of production, there can be no conflict and so dialectic is impossible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. "What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Marxist histories"?

    With this vicious circle, that is brought by capitalism, comes economic misery for all of society. Marx also had a theory, which described the workers in the capitalist system. Marx used the term alienation of labour in describing what effects the labourers feel under a capitalist system.

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    For Marx, the most important activity in any society was work. This was the way in which society was organized to solve the problems associated with physical survival. In order to work, people have to co-operate. They have to engage in an explicitly social activity that involves people working together to produce commodities.

  1. An analysis of the Marxist Perspective on Religion

    The first thing that becomes clear from this statement, is that Marx is as against atheism as he is religion. This is likely to be due to atheism being a religious term, which is drawn from the said, 'unreality.'

  2. Discuss the conflicts between Employee and Employer by Marxist

    Obviously every society has to do this. But under capitalism, goods are not merely produced to satisfy someone's want or need, but primarily for sale. That is the paramount function of capitalist industry.3 The nature of industrial capitalism can be worked out from the definition of the two systems where

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    This demarcation or limit consists in the fact that Marx's sociology, as a critique of political economy, emerges out of a survey and observation of capitalist society. This society is fundamentally based on a dichotomy and has developed a science, i.e.

  2. Why did Marx and Engels believe that history was on their side?

    in the bourgeois, that they receive only a minute of portion of the profit made from the sales of their goods, and that their families suffer mainly because of the workings of capitalism. 2 A period of dictatorship by the proletariat would be necessary to establish order, but afterwards the

  1. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    But also that religion is superficial and on the surface only. In 1844, when Friedrich Engel's visited him in Paris, the two men found that they had independently arrived at identical views on the nature of revolutionary problems. They began to collaborate to disclose systematically the theoretical principles of communism

  2. Why does Marx believe that capitalism will inevitably give way to socialism?

    he outlined, and it is these conflicts and contradictions, which sees the movement from one mode of production to the next i.e. from ancient to feudal, as no society can remain static in the presence of such problems. The contradictions involve the divide between two social groups in the various

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work