• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Overpaid and Underworked: Plight of the Canadian Senate

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Overpaid and Under Worked The Plight of the Canadian Senate Chen Shu 100115919 November 6th 2007 Pol1119 - Prosperi When an architect designs a structure, one of the important questions that are posed before all others is "How useful is the structure?" An effective design is one that efficient and which every design and every structure carries with it, as sense of purpose. The founding fathers of Canada's political structure mimicked the parliamentary system with that specific purpose in mind, but what was written on the constitution and what is practiced today are complete polar opposites. The current day Canadian Senate operates with a minimal amount of practical power and serves as symbolic rubber stamp to all the policies that are initialized by the Cabinet and the House of Commons. In order to explore the need for Senate reform in Canada, it is relevant to compare it's utility with the neighboring Senate of United states on three interrelated dimensions: the powers they wield, the principles or statutes by which they are selected and the means they represent their constituencies. The comparison drawn between the two Senates should serve to note the need by Canadians who call for the Triple-E Senate reform. ...read more.

Middle

The citizens of each respective state are able select federal representatives, but at the same time, not having to completely overhaul the entire Senate. To have an elected Senate, in theory means the Senate members must be responsible to his/her constituency, or face the grime nature of replacement by the end of his/her tenure. This sense of responsibility for one's own state's well-being keeps the American Senators in check when proposing legislations for the represented state. With the presence of an appointed Senate, one does not have to answer to the people thus causing the Canadian Senate members to be free from the fear of removal. In fact, this aspect lack of responsibility that we see Senators in Canada as people at the end of their careers opting for a more eventful and time occupying retirement. Whereas than US Senators who in many instances have gone on to become Presidents.6 Equal The American Constitution penned through the hands of Thomas Jefferson among other founding fathers stated, "We hold these truth to be self-evident, all men are created equal..." This notion of equality was realized through the formation of the US bicameral system. ...read more.

Conclusion

While it is ideal and noble to dream about a Senate that is equal, elected and effective. Does Canada really need such a radical change? People have often say, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Yes, the Canadian Senate may seem like the remnants of an antiquated past of our birth of federalism, but has it caused Canadians any drastic problems? It could be concluded that the Senate for most part of steered clear of the scrutiny of Canadian mass media, only coming under criticism for isolated cases. I'm sure as the years progress, the call for Senate reform will come up again and again, but until the majority party in the House of Commons were threatened by retaliation from the Senate, or unless another Senate takes a long extend sabbatical9, this call will ceased to be answered. And while it is glamorous to speak of Senate reforms, and cleaning up the dusty upper house, people would argue there are more important issues that concern Canadians. The threat of a partisan Senate collecting monthly salary for doing a minimal amount of work will always be there. It will take more than brokers of votes selling Senate reform every upcoming election to garner the steady footing Senate reform needs to succeed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    The US constitution is very hard to amend, it requires the approval of 2/3 of both houses of congress, and also 3/4 of all states, and the President has no formal role in this process (The Supreme Court rejected Bill Clinton's line item veto as being unconstitutional).

  2. Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate ...

    Also with a first past the post system, the most populous states would nearly always provide the President. So with direct election out of the question, the two main alternatives were to let either the Senate or the House of Representatives elect the Presidency.

  1. Constitutional Comparison

    constitution is known as codified, where the system is written and establishes the rules and principles that are set out and this single authoritative document comprising of seven articles totalling seven thousand words specifies the elements of the conduct of government.

  2. We Were All Created Equal

    Same-sex marriage has some very distinct facts and values important to one's religion, morals, or even what his or her family thinks of the gay lifestyle. Citizens believe same-sex marriage should stay banned because it doesn't follow God's word. Constructing laws to ban same-sex marriage because of religion is wrong.

  1. A Brilliant Solution: From the Founding to the Present

    Without armed forces, the United States was vulnerable to attack from many foreign nations and also was unable to force the British occupying forts in the Northwest Territory of the United States to leave, as agreed upon in the Treaty of Paris.

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    Now there should be a distinction into what was authorized by the executive branch, what was actually carried out in the detention centers and what was eventually admitted to and or defended by the administration. These distinctions will be clarified in the following section.

  1. A Passage of a Bill Through the American and Canadian Governments

    Let's trace the progress of this law-child through the government, since it is the one that has all the chances to survive the danger of getting rejected - its parents, the leading party, will make sure it becomes a law.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    Weapon access then and now are two completely different scenarios. The Second Amendment covers the right to bear arms: ?A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed? (Modern Day Gun Control).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work