• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Government & Politics Essay: Participation is the essence of democracy Teacher: Ms S Lightbowne Student: Kamahl Brown 12FXL ________________ ?Participation is the essence of democracy? Discuss For many years and even centuries one of the main discussions that have been very dominant is the ?right to vote.? The right to vote is a phrase that has been in headlines for many centuries to give countries more of a democracy. The United States, Women across the world and many minorities had to fight and millions died in the process to fight for their right to vote. However, is voting the essence of democracy or is voting an overrated task? Is participation of the people needed to make a democracy? Democracy means the right to vote, it doesn?t mean that you have to vote, if no one votes then it?s a democracy because it shows that no one are interest on how the country is ran so the previous government that was voted by the people, will carry on making the decision. In the United Kingdom, if you are over the age of 18 and you do not have a criminal record, you are allowed to vote. If you are ill and you want someone else to vote on your behalf, that vote will be rejected. ...read more.

Middle

To interpret what Burke was saying, is that if citizens leave their trust into the governments? hand, then evil will prevail. What he is trying to promote is a fairer world but with the input of the people. Burke?s main influences in life were religion as both of his parents were strong believers. Burke wanted to widen out the political participation as he wanted to defend the independence of the House of Commons as he opposed the King George III attempts to regain some of the prerogatives that the monarchy had lost in the Glorious Revolution of 1689. (UK Political, General Election Turnout 1945-2010) As you can see from this graph, the turnout has dropped down significantly. The main reason is disenchantment. Many voters lose faith and trust in those who are in government. As you can analyse in 1950 it was the highest turnout. The Second World War finished 5 years before and the people wanted to be in a society where they were confortable and safe. Though there has been a few upwards growth for example in 1979 when the first female was running to be Prime Minister and Margarat Thatcher won the peoples vote. The biggest dip was between 1997 and 2007. The Electoral Voter Commission stated that the reason why the turnout was a lot of 18-24 year olds did not vote. ...read more.

Conclusion

The middle class votes Conservatives and working class votes Labour), another is the rational choice theory (Himmelweit at al 1981 said that citizens vote due to the performance of the previous administration and how it?ll effect their or their families goals, the last and final theory is the Dominant Ideology Theory (Dunleavy and Husbands 1985 argues that people vote due to the mass media and the misrepresentation). These theories suggest that we as the people have created competition, security and democracy. The UK leads by example because if people do not participate as citizens of a country, the citizens would be more of a dictatorship. John Prescott wanted devolution for the South East; however they voted against it by a milestone. This is the essence for democracy. In my opinion I believe that if someone doesn?t want to vote or participate because of the lack of trust or because of financial issues then they shouldn?t, why should someone vote for a party or become a member of a party if they are not fulfilling their promises? However, I do believe that if a high proportion of the population do not vote then democracy will not take place because it is not a representative of the whole country. AS Government & Politics ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Does democracy bring peace?

    In his 1994 State of the Union address promoting the spread of democracy, President Clinton made three major assumptions, firstly that democracy is desired by every nation and secondly that it could easily be exported to every nation. History has shown that the desire of America for every nation to

  2. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    This had a bearing on electoral geography, namely that the Conservatives dominated the southern part of the country, while Labour was the party of the north and the big cities, areas of economic decline and decay. Another theory was that of sectoral cleavage.

  1. Iran Country Study

    Iran has an extensive social security network and welfare system. If the government were to cover insurance better, the poorer people would have access to doctors and hospitals. Conversely, if the government cut health care spending, everyone would have less coverage or fewer people would have the same coverage.

  2. What are the dilemmas of a pluralist democracy?

    While this accounts for all individual opinion through a variety of channels there are many disadvantages. Actions by the government are generated independent of the legislature and are often influenced by pressure groups. This seems illegitimate and undemocratic; normally the government has a function of promoting interests according to the demands of the people.

  1. Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

    Therefore, anyone can enter into the political system and be involved to any level. But in the ruling elite theory, in all states, the only way to enter the ruling elite is through the ruling elite. They control the addition of new "members" and use "top-down" control, so that not just anybody can enter into the political "game".

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    In 1993 and 1995, this provided a powerful disincentive for kindred parties to unite into fewer, larger organizations. The main incentive for building a larger party is to obtain sufficient representation to advance an agenda. But why should Russia's party leaders sacrifice the autonomy of their organizations to build strong

  1. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    Government liberalization and loss of power and authority 2. Opposition expands support, hoping to bring down the government 3. Forceful suppression and containment of opposition power by government 4. Government and opposition leaders explore negotiation and compromise Standpatters in government During the transition period (or reformasi), the following standpatters were found in government: the military, the hegemonic party Golkar, and Suharto himself.

  2. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    However, surely this would not be what advocates of the Classical theory, such as Rousseau, would count as a participatory democracy, since a truly participatory democracy calls for full and equal participation by all. We must admit then, as Rousseau does, that such a system of total participation is realisable only in small groups.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work