• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Peel - "A great Prime minister, but a poor party leader"-How far do you agree with this assessment?

Extracts from this document...


"A great Prime minister, but a poor party leader" -How far do you agree with this assessment? Peel is widely regarded as the dominant politician of his age .I would agree with the quote that when in power, Peel was a far greater Prime Minister than a party leader. However it is interesting to note that the opposite could be argued when Peel was in opposition To win the hearts and minds of the people he needed to present his party as a united, organised force. This requires strong leadership and the fact that he won the general election goes some way to prove that he must have been successful. His attempts to modernise the Tories when he joined are usually associated with the re-branding of the party to become "The Conservatives" in 1834. This re-branding, The Tamworth Manifesto, countless speeches and re-unification of the party were all good indications that Peel had the potential to be a good party leader. However this was not true as upon electoral victory, one may argue that his priorities changed and the party was second to the country. ...read more.


This demonstrates the fact that Peel was very good at what he was either interested or believed in, for everything else was almost irrelevant. This shows Peel to be inflexible and close-minded. These virtues proved to have negative effects on Peel as a party leader. When Peel wanted to do something he did it, irrespective of what the Party thought. One prime example of this is the Corn Laws. The Irish famine of 1845 finally made Peels mind up over his course of action regarding the Corn Laws. He had decided that repeal of the Corn Laws would not only be a natural continuation of his so far popular financial reform, it would help bridge the gap between the social classes. It would lead to cheaper bread for the working classes and would reflect the aristocracy in a paternalistic light. Unfortunately for Peel, (who had politically "U-Turned" on his pre-election pledge to maintain the Corn Laws) his backbenchers strongly disagreed. Upon voicing their opinion, Peel threatened to resign. This shows weakness as leader. Peels inflexibility or inability to compromise and even communicate with those who disagreed with him split the Conservative party to its defeat at the next election. ...read more.


He considered the risk of upsetting the protectionist lobby within his party by creating cheaper living conditions. Donald Read argues that: "Peel was the best peacetime Prime minister in British history. He was equally the hero of the newly enfranchised, propertied middle classes and of the disenfranchised propertyless masses". By the time the Corn Laws had been repealed due mainly to Whig support, The Conservative party was in tatters. The internal conflicts had been exposed and the authority of Peel as Prime minister had been painfully undermined. Peel resigned giving way to another Whig administration. It seems that Peel was a man who was more interested in his personal aims for the country rather than personal aims for party and country. It seems that he used the desperate Tory party as a means of transport for his own Conservatism. Everybody else got in the way. Before the 1841 electoral victory Peel had aimed to get in power and this is what he did through the party. After this the party were more of a hindrance than an integral part of his political career. Therefore one concludes that government weakened the leadership of he Conservative party, and by his very nature Peel could not have been a good party leader and Prime minister at the same time. Tim Hoy 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    policy and not just a technical rubber stamp for decisions taken elsewhere. At first sight, some of the powers that Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf intends to award himself are similar to those enjoyed by presidents in such countries as the United States and France.

  2. The Labour Party.

    * In 1922 the party were in government with over 300 seats in the House of Commons but by 1935 they had only 21 seats. * They did not recover and continued to lose popularity and respect. * At the 1951 General Election they won only six seats obtaining a mere 2.5% of the total vote.

  1. Role of a team leader

    He or she should: * Encourage and maintain open communication * Help the team to develop and keep to a good way of performing and focusing on the task * Be an active listener and show initiative when things become flat by building up rapport to help maximise performance *

  2. Explain how Peel changed the fortunes of the Conservative party 1829 - 41 Between ...

    He did all this by publishing the 'Tamworth Manifesto' in 1834, it proved to be a success and the catalyst for changing the Tory Party into the Conservatives as they had gained 100 seats in the election of 1835 and became the largest single party in the House of Commons.

  1. Was Robert Peel's reorganisation of the Tory party the most important factor in the ...

    Moreover, Peel understood that the middle classes, newly provided with voting rights, were a more important social grouping than ever. He thus looked to modernise the party by making it less narrow and less dogmatic, enabling him to take advantage of the Reform Bill's hidden benefits.

  2. Disraeli and Modern Conservatism.

    election, but never secured the affection of the public or Conservative backbenchers. To general surprise, he won the 1970 election and became Prime Minister. Despite his personal achievement in taking Britain into the Common market, the failures of the Heath ministry of 1970-1974 have been the catharsis of modern Conservatism.

  1. How effective a Party leader was Peel in the years 1834-41?

    This decision made Peel leader of the party, forcing him on the Ultra's. However before his government fell in April 1835 Peel had the status of the premiership behind him, he had presided over a General Election, which pulled the Party together and increased its parliamentary membership by some ninety MP'S.

  2. "Constitutional reform had gone too far, or not far enough?" Discuss

    With the implementation of equal boundary sizes, there will be several representatives for the area, which would go some way to ensuring that votes are equal. Nevertheless, this particular constitutional reform is favourable to the Conservatives, as the Isle of Wight is a predominantly Conservative area.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work