• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Politics - The system for electing MPs to the House of Commons is called First-Past-The-Post.

Extracts from this document...


James Collinson L6 12 Politics Homework 1. The system for electing MPs to the House of Commons is called First-Past-The-Post. The country is split into 659 constituencies each of which is represented by a Member of Parliament or an MP. Each person in the UK gets one vote, which they use to choose which candidate will represent their constituency in parliament. In order to vote you simply put an 'X' next to the name of the candidate you support. The candidate with the most votes wins, regardless of whether he or she has more than 50% support or a majority. Once members have been individually elected, the party with the most seats in Parliament, regardless of whether or not it has a majority across the country normally becomes the next government. This system ensures means that the person with the most seats gets into power. 2. The turnout for the 2001 general election was a record low. Just 59.4% of those eligible to vote actually voted. This is lower than 1974 when there were two elections in one year. ...read more.


This is because he knows that if he changes the system to proportional representation he will not be the Prime Minister as he would need 50% of the vote and at the present time he has 41.4%. Scotland and Wales have what is known as the Additional Member System (AMS). These two have changed or have been set up like this because it is thought to be a more modern way of voting and a much fairer way i.e. the person with the most votes has the most seats. Our system of voting - first past the post - is quite unfair. For example the Liberal Democrats get around 20% of the vote but only get 7.6% of the seats in the Commons. In Scotland the voting system changed as it was thought that if the first past the post system was used Labour would have a massive majority in the Scottish Parliament and the conservatives would have no seats at all even though they had a percentage of the vote. Another reason pressure has increased is because New Labour promised it in their manifesto. ...read more.


In 1997 47.1% of British MPs were elected by less then 50% of the votes in their constituencies. In 1992, 40.1% of MPs were not supported by as many as 50% of their constituents. But as a result of this it is very hard for laws to get passed as there are many parties each with a share of the seats and none of them have a majority often. It also does not give the smaller parties anymore seats than they would usually get and they will still not have enough seats to get their points across. But on the other hand this is a good thing as it is unlikely that extremist parties e.g. BNP will get enough seats to make their voice heard. There are good and bad points to PR and in my opinion it is unlikely to happen in the near future as there are more pressing matters needing to be addressed by the Labour government for example - Iraq, Health and Education. It also suits them if not many people vote because they seem to be winning now so why should they change. Although they believe in change they now seem to be taking all the steps the conservatives did on their policy of "If it ain't broke, don't change it". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Outline the problems of the First Past the Post system and consider whether the ...

    3 star(s)

    2010, p.115). For instance, in 2005 the UK General Election 65% of overall votes was wasted (BBC news 2005). Each vote is significant as it affects final result. Moreover, wasted votes lead to depressed turnout. Fewer people are willing to vote as they think their votes are not counted or

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    > Disproportionate elections- FPTP does not award seats in proportion to the total votes cast, this system discriminates in favour of some parties against others. Winning parties win a considerably higher proportion of seats than votes. For Example Labour in 1997 won 43.3% of the vote but was converted to a 63.4% landslide of the available seats.

  1. State a case for and against replacing the current voting system used to elect ...

    This means that political parties do not try has hard to campaign and influence the constituencies vote as they are very likely to win a majority whether or not they campaign. Also conservative voters living in Bootle vote are meaningless and are therefore wasted so they might vote tactically to

  2. Democracy and Voting

    What are the arguments in favour of FPTP? * It is simple to understand in relation to other systems i.e. voters have one choice only. * The voter can express a view on which party should form the next govt. * Creates strong and decisive govt and no need for coalitions which can be problematic.

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    is certainly a positive step in the right direction, providing the MPs don't think that these plans to monitor and restrict their expenses account isn't just some elaborate April fools prank. What other issues may affect the loss of faith?

  2. Should MP's be paid more?

    The Mail takes this point further and suggests 'we need people with experience of all kinds of life to come into politics and we need to reward them properly'. Both The Times and The Mail pinpoint how a salary hike would help to improve the situation and lead to as

  1. Constitution and Politics

    Case laws (when no authoritative law or text - relating to subject - is available they make the law based on their knowledge. Judges can decide in areas of uncertainty until the areas are covered * Constitutional Conventions (binding but have no legal force): Cabinet meetings are kept secret, bill

  2. Assess the advantages of the 'First Past the Post' electoral system.

    A third advantage of FPtP is party representation. FPtP allows a link between voter and the MP. The public know who to go to when they want something changed or to complain ? the MP of their constituency. FPtP can also stop parties with extremist views from coming into power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work