• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

presidential power how far does it go

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE PRESIDENTIAL POWERS: HOW FAR DO THEY GO? THE ATTACK ON AMERICAN IDEALS September 11, the twin towers, a monument to Americas' supremacy fell in an instant covered by smoke and dust. One after the other they crumbled and the war on terror begun. Since that day the president of the United States has permitted by executive order some extraordinary measures. Wire tapping on American citizens has been authorized, torture has been deemed necessary and Guantanamo has been changed to suit this purpose. Controversy has arisen in these matters do to the fact that opponents have stated that these measures are either illegal or contrary to core American values. This paper will explore both sides of the argument and arrive at a conclusion. Jane Mayer contends that the Bush's response to the 9/11 attacks, the putative War on Terror has been carried out using methods which are contrary to American "ideals". These actions were perpetrated by the passage of the Patriot Act and specific actions that Jane Mayer and others claimed overstepped the boundaries of this legislation. In no particular order, these acts include; - the indefinite incarceration of prisoners, including preteens, with minimal or any reasonable proof of guilt; \ - the domestic surveillance program involving wiretapping of American citizens without empowering the court to make sure that the government ascertain that the conversations being intercepted actually involve a target in the investigation; - the torture of prisoners; - the jailing of US citizens as enemy combatants without charges; - the delay for notice of search warrants to be delayed for an indefinite reasonable time.; - the abuse of the current material witness statute, improperly detaining material witnesses indefinitely without rights in accordance with criminal statutes.; - the use of the FISA courts to obtain business records relevant to national security As will be detailed these acts directly abrogated either perceived elements of the Constitution or treaties with foreign governments which indirectly conflicts with constitutional responsibilities. ...read more.

Middle

A half century later, the world is a much small place, and the time frame for making decisions has shrunk accordingly. John Yoo (11,14) of the Justice Department, contends that the centralization of authority is particularly "crucial in matters of national defense, war and foreign policy where a unitary executive is in the best position to evaluate threats, consider policy choices and mobilize national resources". Day to day choices in a time of war are no place for long winded public discourse. However, if we are questioning whether current acts are in opposition to the ideals of the state - the term ideals is so vague as to at times be either pretentious or irrelevant. What good are ideals if there is anarchy? What good are ideals if they endanger society as a whole. The real ideal of the American system is that checks and balances provide an ideal government. In this context, perhaps the best source of this defense is Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Paper #70. "Energy is the leading character of good government". Furthermore, he adds; "It is essential to the protection of the community against foreign attacks." It is not less essential to the steady administration of the laws, "to the protection of property against the enterprises and assaults of ambition, of faction and of anarchy". Herein, lies the ideal - to preserve the greater good, sometimes the president has the responsibility of acting. Thus, the republic was set up with "the favor of a single executive and a numerous legislature". "Decision, activity, secrecy and dispatch will characterize the proceedings of one man in a much more eminent degree than the proceedings of any greater number". Let us for one moment concentrate on the word: SECRECY. In times of war one does go about discussing strategies in the public domain. And the more involved in the decision making process the more likely leaking of sensitive information. ...read more.

Conclusion

70 (19)that "Men oppose a thing, merely because they have no agency in planning it, or because it may have been planned by those they dislike." "They seem to think themselves bound in honor and by all motives of personal infallibility to defeat the success of what has been resolved upon contrary to their sentiments." The debate on the issues has descended into a cacophonous row of partisan politics. It is hard to remember that the Patriot Act was passed by massive majorities in both Houses of Congress. During the Reagan administration, a congressional committee investigated the Iran-contra affair and submitted a report (Schultz pg 159) split "sharply on partisan grounds" with the minority report supporting the Reagan administration and condemning unlimited Congressional power. In March 1999, President Clinton approved the unilateral bombing in Kosovo (to prevent genocide) without clear Congressional authorization. Many of those same congressmen who voted against Reagan's actions, affirmed Clinton's, and now again condemn Bush's imperial presidency. The key word in all this is partisan. The system of law is one of evolution. The laws of war have changed. The laws of fighting these wars are also in flux. Is there a perfect solution to defining this change? Obviously not. Mistakes have been made. But therein, lays the glory of the system of checks and balances. Court challenges have been pursued - some won, some lost. Laws have been modified and will be modified by Congress. My contention is that Ms. Mayer has too narrowly defined the term ideals. She is missing the forest for the trees. For our purposes, the Constitution is the Ideal. I describe it as a symbiotic system made up of three parts. For the system to survive all three elements must work together. The current crisis has come to prove that this Ideal is still a vibrant system. It evolves over time; with each of the three components nurturing their partners and helping the others perform optimally. It is because the system can survive, that all those rights and other ideals that are derived from within it can also survive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, ...

    The president cannot veto sections of the bill; the whole bill must be vetoed. Congress has three options upon receiving a vetoed bill, it may put the right the 'wrongs' identified by the president in his veto message and return the bill for his signature.

  2. The British Constitution

    Baron Montesquieu's view was that if you keep the powers separate, the democracy will survive and there will be no dictatorship. Most western constitutions have taken this on to some extent. "[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.

  1. To what extent is the American Constitution an elitist document?Why then did the framers ...

    elitist document because of the way in which the Founding Fathers (a tiny fraction of the population) decided to scrap the AOC and come up with an alternative behind closed doors, without the majority of the population knowing what was going on.

  2. How far does the president only have the power to pursuade

    The power of the purse, effectively the control over the massive US budgets is a power of Congress not the President, and thus the Presidents only real method of influencing how this is spent is by influencing the heads of department's decisions, most of whom will be present in his Cabinet.

  1. Explain the significance of the New Hampshire Primary and the Iowa Caucus in the ...

    The platform committee will hold meeting between January and June of the presidential election year and then the draft version of the document is presented to delates during the National Party Convention. Traditionally, there may have been debates at the conferences about topical matters for the platform, but nowadays these are discouraged so as to avoid portraying disunity.

  2. Where Power Lies in Congress

    aren't as strongly tied to the parties, and chairs have tended to be more independently-minded and focused on their expert area rather than their party. In the past few decades though, this has definitely begun to change. Most noticeably in 1994 and the 'Republican Revolution' lead by Newt Gingrich.

  1. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    American Bar Association credited him as ?qualified?, as opposed to the conventional labelling ?highly qualified?. Whether their labelling was determined by the colour of his skin is a different matter. Instead they chose to concentrate on mendacious accusations of sexual harassment made by Anita Hill.

  2. How effective has the US been at defending civil liberties at a time of ...

    This is a good example of judicial activism. In Rasul vs. Bush, the Court ruled that detainees held on a US military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, were entitled to constitutional protection.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work