"Presidents Have Only The Power To Persuade" Discuss

Authors Avatar

“Presidents have only the power to persuade” Discuss

Firstly, I will say that in this answer, I will be looking at the overall ‘office’ of the Presidency, as opposed to looking at the personality of individual Presidents. The traditional view of the Presidency is that of the ‘imperilled Presidency’, as described by former President Gerald Ford, in contrast to Arthur Schlesinger’s idea of an ‘imperial Presidency’. The ‘imperilled Presidency’ idea describes a Presidency in which the President does not have enough power to be truly effective, and we see Presidents attempting to go beyond their constitutional powers. Richard Neustadt challenged this idea by saying that "Presidential power is the power to persuade, and the power to persuade is the power to bargain." In more simple terms, this means that the ultimate power of the President is to persuade people that his opinions are in their best interests. However, I would like to prove that it really depends on the situation to how the President chooses to use his power, and under certain circumstances the Presidents power of persuasion will be most successful.

Join now!

Firstly, I will look at the Constitutional powers given to the President. The Founding Fathers created the constitution in an attempt to prevent a tyrannical rule, like the British. The Constitution therefore would ensure that no one particular Government Branch could become too powerful, checks and balances were created, to prevent each branch from becoming over powerful. We can see that although the President has the power to initiate bills, and has strong influence and power in the legislative process; the President still has to have approval from Congress. In the Presidents State of the Union, the President can ...

This is a preview of the whole essay