• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prime Ministerial Power. Conventionally, the British government is referred to as a Cabinet Government, but many feel that the system is changing. Cabinet has become suspended and centralisation of power is occurring.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Questioning the Prime Ministers governing style is common in today's society. Conventionally, the British government is referred to as a Cabinet Government, but many feel that the system is changing. Cabinet has become suspended and centralisation of power is occurring. In the 1960s, Conservative MP Humphrey Berkley claimed that Britain had an almost "unchecked presidential rule", and at the dawn of a new century, comparisons between Blair and Bush stretch beyond foreign policy to governing system. The traditional view of a government is that the seat of power in terms of policy initiation and decision making lies in the Cabinet. They coordinate and control government policy as a whole. This view underlies the principle of collective responsibility. James Callaghan (1976-1979) and John Major (1990-1997) both displayed the traditional role of a Prime Minister. Both adopted a consensus-seeking, less strident, less decisive and more pragmatic approach to decision making. In 1992, John Major was labeled "Honest John" by the press because he was not domineering as compared to his predecessor, Margaret Thatcher. ...read more.

Middle

When discussing presidency, the American model is preferred, as it is the most dominate of presidential models in the world. It is true that British Prime Ministers are becoming presidential. Take for example, Tony Blair tried to be "the voice of the people" and thus changed the role to that of a statesmen rather than party politician. This was seen after Princess Diana's death in 1997 when Blair led the nation's mourning and spoke openly about the Diana being the "People's Princess". Another example was the Iraq War 2003; he did not follow his party's wishes and instead followed a course of action that he strongly believed was morally and politically justified. In relation to the presidential role of a British Prime Minister, his power of patronage gas increased greatly. Similarly, the President appoints almost 4000 officials. The appointment of Lord Chancellor ensures that the Prime Minister is not allowed a voice in the House of Lords, but he also has the opportunity to expand his power of patronage. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there is a momentous debate as to whether the Prime Minister has become more presidential. Within the British constitution, it is possible for Prime Ministers to stretch the power of the office and make the post their own. This explains why certain Prime Ministers have had a clear influence such as Thatcher and Blair while others do not. Perhaps it is essential to look at the definition of president and whether Britain is ready to change its traditional constitution into one that is similar to America. Like what Tony Benn said "The present centralisation of power into the hands of one person has gone too far and amounts to a system of personal rule in the very heart of our parliamentary democracy" Many people consider the role of the Prime Minister has changed but it is believed that in the future, Britain will have its own model of presidency and perhaps elements of a Cabinet government. ?? ?? ?? ?? "Britain no longer has a cabinet government, instead it has a Prime Minister becoming a President" Discuss Rebecca Yeo 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    The investigations carried out by such bodies often gain public attention and mass media coverage, prominent examples being the Watergate Committee of 1974 which had mass following and demonstrated the power of such committees, by subpoenaing vital evidence which led to the resignation of Richard Nixon.

  2. The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the ...

    The British Prime Minister, in theory, is held to account and scrutinized widely by the Select Committees of the commons and the in House debates and Question Time. Select Committees have the right to 'persons, papers and records' and may commission damning reports which are of great use in scrutinizing

  1. Does Britain have a Prime Ministerial or Cabinet Government?

    The growth of the party system has increased the Prime Ministers power. MPs now represent political parties and it is to the party that they owe their job. Therefore their loyalty lies with the party rather than the constituency. As the Prime Minister controls the largest party and appoints both

  2. The relationship between the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

    Recent examples have included the educational blips made by Estelle Morris, the former Education Secretary, involving A-level results, Key Stage 3 results and top-up fees, and Neil Hamilton over the "Cash for Questions" and other sleaze allegations. The Exchange Rate Mechanism devaluation and exit prompted then Chancellor Nigel Lawson to

  1. To what extent has the Prime Minister become Presidential?

    This is of course undermining the Cabinet. He ensures that all departments are in agreement and follow his line. Blair has downgraded the Cabinet and is increasingly centralising power around his office to an even greater extent than that of Thatcher.

  2. To what extent does the prime minister dominate the UK political system?

    The classic example is Gordon Brown in Tony Blair's cabinet. Brown had large numbers of backbenchers and party members loyal to him, even though Blair could have sacked him doing so was inconceivable. Brown was thought highly of by the cabinet, his reputation in the country was strong.

  1. Which do you consider to be the more powerful chief executive in his or ...

    For instance, Tony Blair could never sideline Gordon Brown. Therefore in short, the PM is chair of a committee without whose support he is ineffective. John Major typifies this approach, which was seen as a pragmatic style of leadership in face of a small majority in the Commons. He would hold consensual cabinet meetings but was nevertheless criticised in the media for being weak, ineffective and directionless.

  2. How can Coalition government affect the traditions of the Cabinet system?

    To understand them we shall define a Cabinet government first. According to Walter Bagehot, the cabinet has combined executive and legislative functions which is "the most powerful body in the state"(Lowe, C., Owen, V. et al., 2010). It is a main decision-making system where the most important questions are discussed and solved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work