• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal? After centuries of raging conflict, a new hope was found. On 13th September 1993, the Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin, and Palestinian President, Yasser Arafat shook hands on a historic peace deal. This deal was based on a 'Land for Peace' agreement - agreeing that the Israelis would get a fair share of land in Palestine, that they lost during the previous two wars that the two nations had had, if they agreed to withdraw its troops from Gaza Strip and West Bank by April 1994, therefore giving the Palestinian security. This deal was welcomed by most of the population of both nations, however, a few Fundamentalists, again from both nations, disagreed. This small minority of people would be the bulk of the problem that would lead to the eventual breakdown of the Peace Deal. In September 1995, the Peace Deal received another boost, when the Oslo II agreement was signed; this meant the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Palestinian populated areas, which increased self rule for the Palestinians. The Palestinians were also given responsibility of education and culture, health, welfare, taxation and tourism. Within this, elections were also set to take place on the Gaza Strip and the West Bank for a new Palestinian authority. ...read more.

Middle

Palestinian President Arafat therefore agreed to crack down on terrorist group HAMAS. The Arab nation was disgusted by this agreement, as the amount of land that was given to them was just a fraction of what was first agreed they are, however, pleased at the release of the Palestinian prisoners by the Jews. The Jewish nation was pleased at Arafat's promise to crack down on HAMAS, as that would stop most attacks, therefore making a more secure state. However they were not convinced over his influence he had over groups such as these. The 1993 Peace Deal had now failed, although attempts to salvage a new one had been made, it was nowhere near as good as the first - this caused a lot of conflict. This linked to the same argument that was usually presented - Arabs wanted to gain the land they lost, whilst the Jews wanted security. Soon after, Israel saw Ehud Barak elected as new Prime Minister, he was seen to be a tough character, but also willing to compromise. This news was given a positive reaction by people from both nations, as hope of a new deal emerged. The new outlook from the Prime Minister made the new compromise look even more realistic, and the harsh, stubborn days of Netanyahu seemed to be forgotten. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the 11th of November, 2004, the Palestinian President, Yasser Arafat, died aged 75. This was met by devastation from the Palestinians, who had lost their leader of many years, who had supported them through the Peace Deal and the breakdown of it. However, Israelis welcomed this news; Arafat was seen by these as a terrorist, who murdered thousands of their own race. This, again, signified the breakdown of the peace deal, now with none of the original negotiators alive, the deal seemed hopeless. The newly elected Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, sent his security forces into the Gaza Strip, in the hope of curbing militant groups' attacks on Israeli targets. He hoped that, if successful, he could begin a revival of the Middle East Peace Process. This pleased moderate Palestinians and Israelis however, angered fundamentalists from both nations, as moves towards peace and compromising had been made. This inspired them to fight back and continue the conflict. This move, echoes previous conflict of opposition forces moving in onto the same territory, this could spark either peace or violence. To conclude, during my research I have discovered many factors that lead to the eventual breakdown of the 1993 Peace Deal. I believe that opposing opinions of the public lead to the demise of it. The assassination of Prime Minister Rabin echoes this. All of these events show how the people, and eventually governments and nations, refused to compromise their land in exchange for peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    gain publicity such as in big cities, events and places where the media is located. The more extreme their act, the more publicity they receive which is why many attacks are becoming bigger and more destructive. Terrorism can come in many different forms but there will always be debate on whether something really can be classed as terrorism or not.

  2. What are the main differences between the beliefs of Palestinian Arabs and Israeli Jews?The ...

    Sadat was later assassinated by Egyptian soldiers. They believed that his deal with Israel had disgraced them. Question Three - Previous outbreaks of violence in Palestine/Israel have been followed by peace talks. What problems need to be overcome for the present violence to end peacefully?

  1. Can terrorism ever be a legitimate and effective means of pursuing political goals?

    Like most terrorist organizations NV believed that the Tsarist rule of the time left them with no other choice than terrorism to force 'political reform and overthrow the Tsarist autocracy'. Even older terrorist organizations also tried to avoid injuring civilians by targeting those they directly opposed, such as the Zealots

  2. Arab Israeli Conflict

    successful in the 1967 war, gaining more land in the process like the West bank, this of course angered the Palestinians. To encourage the new land to be absorbed into Jewish control, the government encouraged Jews to move into the land which had cheap and large housing, with lots of other stuff like swimming pools and schools.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    In addition, some hundreds of Palestinians accused of collaborating with Israel had been killed by their compatriots. Over 300 Arab homes in the West Bank and in Gaza had been demolished or sealed up. By contrast, fewer than fifty Israelis had been killed.

  2. Middle east conflict - There have been several attempts to bring peace to this ...

    the only way in which to solve the "plight of the Palestinians" is to declare a holy war or Jihad upon the Jews. The main Islamist movement in the Palestinian territories it was born soon after the previous intifada erupted in 1987.

  1. "What are the main differences between the beliefs and attitudes of the Jews/Israelis and ...

    As the times became more and more violent, this new way of Jewish thinking became a desperate hope for the Jews. In 1882, Zionism was created by the Jewish doctor- Leon Pinsker. The Zionists were radical thinkers who believed that the holy land of Israel (Zion)

  2. The Syrian Uprising

    Government Corruption: Like any other revolution by the people or probably most of them, one of the causes is having a corrupt government. The Syrian Government lead by the Ba'ath Party which is lead by the Assad family, exercises practically 100% full control over everything in Syria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work