• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal?

Extracts from this document...


Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal? After centuries of raging conflict, a new hope was found. On 13th September 1993, the Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin, and Palestinian President, Yasser Arafat shook hands on a historic peace deal. This deal was based on a 'Land for Peace' agreement - agreeing that the Israelis would get a fair share of land in Palestine, that they lost during the previous two wars that the two nations had had, if they agreed to withdraw its troops from Gaza Strip and West Bank by April 1994, therefore giving the Palestinian security. This deal was welcomed by most of the population of both nations, however, a few Fundamentalists, again from both nations, disagreed. This small minority of people would be the bulk of the problem that would lead to the eventual breakdown of the Peace Deal. In September 1995, the Peace Deal received another boost, when the Oslo II agreement was signed; this meant the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Palestinian populated areas, which increased self rule for the Palestinians. The Palestinians were also given responsibility of education and culture, health, welfare, taxation and tourism. Within this, elections were also set to take place on the Gaza Strip and the West Bank for a new Palestinian authority. ...read more.


Palestinian President Arafat therefore agreed to crack down on terrorist group HAMAS. The Arab nation was disgusted by this agreement, as the amount of land that was given to them was just a fraction of what was first agreed they are, however, pleased at the release of the Palestinian prisoners by the Jews. The Jewish nation was pleased at Arafat's promise to crack down on HAMAS, as that would stop most attacks, therefore making a more secure state. However they were not convinced over his influence he had over groups such as these. The 1993 Peace Deal had now failed, although attempts to salvage a new one had been made, it was nowhere near as good as the first - this caused a lot of conflict. This linked to the same argument that was usually presented - Arabs wanted to gain the land they lost, whilst the Jews wanted security. Soon after, Israel saw Ehud Barak elected as new Prime Minister, he was seen to be a tough character, but also willing to compromise. This news was given a positive reaction by people from both nations, as hope of a new deal emerged. The new outlook from the Prime Minister made the new compromise look even more realistic, and the harsh, stubborn days of Netanyahu seemed to be forgotten. ...read more.


On the 11th of November, 2004, the Palestinian President, Yasser Arafat, died aged 75. This was met by devastation from the Palestinians, who had lost their leader of many years, who had supported them through the Peace Deal and the breakdown of it. However, Israelis welcomed this news; Arafat was seen by these as a terrorist, who murdered thousands of their own race. This, again, signified the breakdown of the peace deal, now with none of the original negotiators alive, the deal seemed hopeless. The newly elected Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, sent his security forces into the Gaza Strip, in the hope of curbing militant groups' attacks on Israeli targets. He hoped that, if successful, he could begin a revival of the Middle East Peace Process. This pleased moderate Palestinians and Israelis however, angered fundamentalists from both nations, as moves towards peace and compromising had been made. This inspired them to fight back and continue the conflict. This move, echoes previous conflict of opposition forces moving in onto the same territory, this could spark either peace or violence. To conclude, during my research I have discovered many factors that lead to the eventual breakdown of the 1993 Peace Deal. I believe that opposing opinions of the public lead to the demise of it. The assassination of Prime Minister Rabin echoes this. All of these events show how the people, and eventually governments and nations, refused to compromise their land in exchange for peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    The Israel-PLO accord was ratified by the Knesset and the Palestine National Council. The territories needed a solid financial footing if Palestinian self-government, and thus the accord, was to succeed. The US convened a conference of donor nations, and by early October more than forty countries pledged to contribute $2 billion over five years.

  2. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    The motive of the terrorists was publicity for their cause which was to liberate Palestine. Doing this would make the group appear bigger than it really was and direct warfare wouldn't succeed. Many people would say that this is terrorism but the terrorists would say that this is the only way they will achieve their political aims.

  1. What are the main differences between the beliefs of Palestinian Arabs and Israeli Jews?The ...

    There are still many problems that need to be overcome for both sides in Israel/Palestine to live peacefully together. There have been many attempts at peace though nowadays there is still conflict going on. One attempt at peace is the Camp David agreement that happened in 1978.

  2. Question 1 - Jews and Palestinian beliefs for right to land

    to govern certain countries within the Middle East; this was because the Arabs were not yet considered ready to govern themselves. The Treaty of Versailles eventually split up the Middle East, and was taken out of Arab control. This increased the Arab argument for their right to their independence of their race, and their right to Palestine.

  1. "What are the main differences between the beliefs and attitudes of the Jews/Israelis and ...

    The Jews also have a very good religious claim to Palestine, and the evidence for this can be found in the Torah- our first Five Books of the Bible. The Jews have always believed that they are "God's Special People" and that he had helped them through the hardships of life.

  2. Arab and Israeli conflict - source related study.

    I have decided to join the freedom fighters and ask for your blessing". What this source is conveying is that it is telling people that the student is joining the freedom fighters because he no longer wants to be a refugee.

  1. Middle east conflict - There have been several attempts to bring peace to this ...

    The Second barriers to peace are the extremists on both sides in this conflict. These people want 100% of the land and wouldn't be happy with anything less than the whole of Palestine to themselves. Both the Palestinian and Israeli Prime Ministers have hoped that with this new "Road Map

  2. The Syrian Uprising

    The solutions can be classified into three different categories or arenas. The Syrian Arena which is the solution within the Syria; the Arab Arena and the International Arena. Syrian Arena: There are three different scenarios that may take place within the Syrian Arena to end this issue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work