• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal? After centuries of raging conflict, a new hope was found. On 13th September 1993, the Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin, and Palestinian President, Yasser Arafat shook hands on a historic peace deal. This deal was based on a 'Land for Peace' agreement - agreeing that the Israelis would get a fair share of land in Palestine, that they lost during the previous two wars that the two nations had had, if they agreed to withdraw its troops from Gaza Strip and West Bank by April 1994, therefore giving the Palestinian security. This deal was welcomed by most of the population of both nations, however, a few Fundamentalists, again from both nations, disagreed. This small minority of people would be the bulk of the problem that would lead to the eventual breakdown of the Peace Deal. In September 1995, the Peace Deal received another boost, when the Oslo II agreement was signed; this meant the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Palestinian populated areas, which increased self rule for the Palestinians. The Palestinians were also given responsibility of education and culture, health, welfare, taxation and tourism. Within this, elections were also set to take place on the Gaza Strip and the West Bank for a new Palestinian authority. ...read more.

Middle

Palestinian President Arafat therefore agreed to crack down on terrorist group HAMAS. The Arab nation was disgusted by this agreement, as the amount of land that was given to them was just a fraction of what was first agreed they are, however, pleased at the release of the Palestinian prisoners by the Jews. The Jewish nation was pleased at Arafat's promise to crack down on HAMAS, as that would stop most attacks, therefore making a more secure state. However they were not convinced over his influence he had over groups such as these. The 1993 Peace Deal had now failed, although attempts to salvage a new one had been made, it was nowhere near as good as the first - this caused a lot of conflict. This linked to the same argument that was usually presented - Arabs wanted to gain the land they lost, whilst the Jews wanted security. Soon after, Israel saw Ehud Barak elected as new Prime Minister, he was seen to be a tough character, but also willing to compromise. This news was given a positive reaction by people from both nations, as hope of a new deal emerged. The new outlook from the Prime Minister made the new compromise look even more realistic, and the harsh, stubborn days of Netanyahu seemed to be forgotten. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the 11th of November, 2004, the Palestinian President, Yasser Arafat, died aged 75. This was met by devastation from the Palestinians, who had lost their leader of many years, who had supported them through the Peace Deal and the breakdown of it. However, Israelis welcomed this news; Arafat was seen by these as a terrorist, who murdered thousands of their own race. This, again, signified the breakdown of the peace deal, now with none of the original negotiators alive, the deal seemed hopeless. The newly elected Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, sent his security forces into the Gaza Strip, in the hope of curbing militant groups' attacks on Israeli targets. He hoped that, if successful, he could begin a revival of the Middle East Peace Process. This pleased moderate Palestinians and Israelis however, angered fundamentalists from both nations, as moves towards peace and compromising had been made. This inspired them to fight back and continue the conflict. This move, echoes previous conflict of opposition forces moving in onto the same territory, this could spark either peace or violence. To conclude, during my research I have discovered many factors that lead to the eventual breakdown of the 1993 Peace Deal. I believe that opposing opinions of the public lead to the demise of it. The assassination of Prime Minister Rabin echoes this. All of these events show how the people, and eventually governments and nations, refused to compromise their land in exchange for peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    gain publicity such as in big cities, events and places where the media is located. The more extreme their act, the more publicity they receive which is why many attacks are becoming bigger and more destructive. Terrorism can come in many different forms but there will always be debate on whether something really can be classed as terrorism or not.

  2. What are the main differences between the beliefs of Palestinian Arabs and Israeli Jews?The ...

    It said that Israel had to stop building settlements in the West Bank and that both sides had to agree to co-operate on security such as controlling suicide bombers. Another example of these ongoing problems is extremists such as suicide bombers on both sides of the conflict.

  1. "What are the main differences between the beliefs and attitudes of the Jews/Israelis and ...

    As a result, a new Palestinian identity emerged after hundreds of years of mixed emotions. However, a new threat emerged after thousands of years of absence, Jewish Zionists came back to claim what they thought was naturally theirs from the start.

  2. It is ironic how many wars have begun due to religion.

    The Israeli army made successful gains and at the end of war in January 1949 it was clear that it was an Israel victory. In July that year the armistice was signed by the warring nations and now the Palestine they once knew was divided into three parts.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    These riots known as Intifada lasted for the next five years. Within the first year more than 150 Palestinians were killed and around 1 500 were wounded. Education institutions were closed, curfews imposed, hundreds arrested and houses demolished. By 1990 the International Red Cross estimated that more than 800 had been killed by Israeli security forces and 16 000 imprisoned.

  2. To what extent is the city of Jerusalem vital to the followers of three ...

    The Israeli and Palestinian governments have managed to sit around the same table, and divide Palestine between them, but the mere mention of 'Jerusalem', causes them to postpone all discussions. Both parties want complete power over Jerusalem, declaring that the Holy city is a significant, historical symbol of their religion.

  1. 'The new Palestinian Revolt',

    such as "one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter" or "Terrorism, like beauty is in the eye of the beholder".3 The formulations are far too simple however, to account for complex situations. Complexities, that stretch the boundaries of suffering and the Human capability of cruelty, in so doing stretching

  2. The Syrian Uprising

    Russia has also vetoed the resolution condemning the Bashar Regime. The Iranian Government is also supporting the Bashar Regime. They have aided the government with internet, cell phone and media monitoring technology. They have also aided the government with riot control equipment and snipers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work