• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Realism, idealism and neoliberalism

Extracts from this document...


POLITICAL STUDIES POL1005S COVER SHEET Student Name: Brian Lockyer Student Number: LCKBRI001 Tutor: Talisa McMillan Tut Group No: 1 Assignment No:1 Date: August 17th, 2009 Plagiarism Declaration 1. I know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to use another's work and pretend that it is one's own. 2. I have used the Harvard convention for citation and referencing. Each contribution to, and quotation in, this essay from the work(s) of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. 3. This essay is my own work. 4. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work. Signature ______________________________ The realm of international relations encompasses many political theories which have had varying degrees of influence on shaping the political world that we live in today. However, the two main theories that most influence the study of International Relations are Realism and Idealism, since the formation of both theories there has been a constant debate about the relevance and implementations of both theories which has therefore resulted in much conflict between the advocates of each theory. This essay will attempt to examine and contrast the theories of Realism, Idealism and neo-Realism and show how they differ and relate to each other. ...read more.


Both powers were relentless in their pursuit of seizing and securing power and influence throughout the world. It was the sheer strength and dominance of both the USA and USSR that resulted in a shift in world power and therefore the continual ideological conflict between capitalism and communism which divided the world. However, the post Cold War is very much different and the concept of realism is no longer a dominant theory in International Relations. Realism is an anarchical theory, and it is held that under anarchy, survival of the state cannot be guaranteed (Baylis and Smith, 2001:143). On the other hand the concept of Idealism, presents more of an optimistic view on world politics. Referring to great thinkers like Immanuel Kant and his thoughts on perpetual peace, modern Idealism highlights the necessity for cooperation, rationality, morality and non-state actors in order to bring about the fundamental pre requisites for the onset of peaceful and cooperative international relations (Owen, 2000:34). Idealist theories emphasize the positive impact that economic liberalism has on world politics as the generation of wealth through free trade with less national boundaries stimulates economic growth and promotes harmonious relations. Individual states and organisations such as the United Nations are the main implementers of idealist theories. ...read more.


However, for Neo-realists, power is not merely the accumulation of military resources and the ability to intimidate and coerce other states, it is viewed as the combined capabilities of a state. (Baylis and Smith 2001: 209). Neo-realist ideology highlights the importance of anarchy and its effects on defining the international system as all states are functionally similar units who therefore all suffer the same constraints from an anarchical system and are all striving to maintain their position in the system (Baylis and Smith 2001: 209). To conclude all three theories have been influential in shaping the contemporary political landscape of the modern world. However, it must be noted that Realism, after the fall of the USSR began its downfall. Its ineffectiveness in predicting the end of the war meant that it had not fulfilled its primary function and much of its credibility as a political science was therefore lost. Realism was a theory which majorly influenced international relations where it was still relevant but in the 21st century it is nothing more than archaic. Today states no longer view the international sphere as a struggle for power, but more as a mechanism for opening free markets and creating political unions. Supranational institutions are increasing in number and power as a reflection of this. And as this happens realism loses more and more credibility as a theory of international relations in the 21st century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    In On Liberty, he claims that government should never interfere with an individual, except to prevent harm to others (i.e., never be paternalistic). But in Utilitarianism he claims that the right thing to do is whatever will maximize utility. He also admits (what would be absurd to deny), that there

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Ability to give minorities a voice The need for compromise, however, also underscores that in essentially all political organizations it is prudent, indeed essential, to give minorities a continuing voice in the making and execution of policy. Majorities are rarely permanent, and the more durable they become, the more they tend to stagnate or atrophy.

  1. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    Essentially the problem was that the right had a very different idea of what France should be to the left. Dreyfus acted as the symbolic "dividing sword"43that pitched "Reactionaries against republic, clericals against non Catholics, anti-clericals against church, military party against the parliamentarians and the revolutionary socialists against the army."44

  2. Marxism, Idealism and Nationalism

    The notion of class is central to the Marxian theory on structure. Society is divided into various classes and subclasses, but Marx emphasizes the existence of two encompassing classes: the labor class and the capitalist class. The capitalists own and control the means of production, and they are considered the ruling class.

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    sovereignty was the idea that there is a final and absolute political authority in the political community...and no final and absolute authority exists elsewhere". * Michael Walzer (in Nossal 1998:206) points out that a "sovereign state is first and foremost an idea, a way of conceiving how to organise political

  2. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    In other words, Gender Studies theorist believe that cultural implications and constructions are what define masculinity and femininity as opposed to a natural "otherness" that can be connected to either males or females.

  1. Politics A: Analysing Theories of the State and Individual - Hobbes and Locke

    This authority or government was to be elected for a fixed term by a simple majority vote, and it was expected those participating would agree in advance to adhere to the view of the majority. Those elected were themselves bound by this contract and were not above the law.

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    People, Hobbes thought, had an inner motivation revolving around pleasure and hurt. In contrast, Locke assumed that people could not come up with new ideas out of nothing each human could only understand things which he or she had experienced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work