• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Recent election results show the need for electoral reform. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Robyn Ashton ?Recent election results show the need for electoral reform.? Discuss. (25 marks) Electoral reform is the change in an electoral system in an endeavour to improve the reflection of the votes to seats and to create a stronger, more stable government in the future. Currently, the United Kingdom adopts the plurality system first-past-the-post. The winning candidate in each constituency needs to obtain more votes than the candidate in second place; however, it is not necessary that they gain the absolute majority to win. Principally, parties propose a reform because the current electoral system has the tendency to produce unfair results, however, supporters of first-past-the-post argue its strength and why it should not be reformed. The alternative to first-past-the-post proposed is usually proportional representation. PR is an electoral system whereby the percentage of votes cast in an election equals the percentage of seats won in the legislature. Firstly, MPs can be elected on a minority vote with fewer than fifty per cent of the votes meaning more people voted against the candidate than they did for them. ...read more.


The theory of the mandate gives the government in power a moral right to pass into law any policy that was in its manifesto on the basis that the party was elected on the strength of the promises. However, if more people vote against the candidate more people are also voting against the policy. It is also simplistic to suggest that a vote for a party indicates support as it is likely a voter does not agree with all the promises and policies. Furthermore, the winners are always over-represented leading to a government that is too powerful and legislation is easy to pass. An example of this would be the early Blair ministry when Labour had 167 seats the party always outvoted the weaker Conservative party. However, this can be interpreted as an advantage as it allows government to get all the legislation passed that they want without dispute. The over-representation of large parties penalises small and middle sized parties and in particular third parties. ...read more.


However, under PR it is likely the result would be a coalition government which would not create any stability. Coalition governments are invariably weak and the partners often fall out; parties in a coalition government find it difficult to agree and how to solve a problem with different ideologies and policies. It is very likely that a party could therefore pull out of the coalition and the government would collapse. For example, under a PR system Italy had 50 governments in 47 years between 1946 and 1993. A PR government would encourage an indecisive government instead of a decisive one like FPTP does. Furthermore, the plurality voting of first-past-the-post is very easy to understand whilst PR presents many complexities. For example, the Single Transferable Vote (STV) in Ireland requires voters to vote in order of preference and to gain election it is necessary to get a particular quota of the votes. If a candidate is then elected their surplus is redistributed according to the second preferences of voters. If necessary, the bottom candidates are eliminate and their second preference votes are redistributed. More complex systems means that are many more spoilt ballots. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Should the UK reform the Electoral System used for General Elections

    The change in the voting system would threaten the recent Labour majority and also the party have become divided over the issue, therefore suggestions for reform have recently been pushed into the background to avoid embarrassment for the current government.


    A report in 1904 by the Interdepartmental Committee on Physical Deterioration stated the need for feeding in the educational system as well as medical inspections. If the next generation were to be called upon to fight for their country, they would need to be properly nourished in childhood.

  1. Is There A Need For Constitutional Reform?

    in this compliant government, and there was particular anger about the Lib-Dems' failure to stand on the point of principle of opposing tuition fees in Scottish universities. By the time of the second elections in May 2003, the main feature of Scottish government was the row about the mounting cost

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    It also sustains the link between MP and constituency, meaning people feel more involved with the elected party. There are, however, some disadvantages as well, such as it is time consuming, exaggerates any fickle change in public opinion and it is similarly disproportional to FPTP.

  1. Electoral Systems.

    * Extreme parties would be unlikely to gain support by AV and coalition governments would be no more likely to arise than they are under First-Past-The-Post. * All MPs would have the support of a majority of their constituents. * It prevents MPs being elected on a minority of the vote.

  2. "Constitutional reform had gone too far, or not far enough?" Discuss

    However, as they are currently in a coalition with the Liberal Democrats, who wish to dramatically reform the House of Lords, they had to come up with a compromise. This compromise came in the form of proposing for 80% of the members to be elected, with the remaining 20% being appointed by Appointment Committees.

  1. Should Britain reform its electoral system for general elections?

    which then results in a low turnout and the votes are wasted. The electorates voices are then becoming disenfranchised because their views are not being heard, which is why the electoral system should be reformed. Additionally, parties whose support is geographically concentrated do better than those with evenly distributed support.

  2. The case Against Electoral Reform

    Conservative voters in Scotland, for example, might only hope to influence the result through their second choice. And although AV would probably increase the number of marginal seats thus reducing the number of voters effectively excluded from influencing the overall result, most seats in the country would remain safe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work