• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Referendums in the UK

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Referendums in the UK Referendums are government proposals that are put forward by the electorate usually either to accept or reject proposals. Referendums are used as a form of direct democracy in the UK to either influence future parliaments to keep a proposal or to unite current parliaments under one policy. Referendums are considered as a direct form of democracy as the entire electorate vote on constitutional change. Referendums tend to be a Yes or No answer to the question. Referendums are made to make sure the question in no way influences the electorates vote. There have been 7 Major referendums from 1997 onward. These include the devolution of power to Wales and Scottland (both in 1997), Greater London Authority referendum in 1998, The good Friday Agreement in 1998, North East England devolution in 2004, Welsh Devolution referendum in 2011 and the Alternative Vote referendum in 2011. Most of these referendums have been held in the concerning of devolving power to whom it may concern with the exception of the Good Friday Agreement which was a peace treaty, which even then concerned the devolution of power to Northern Ireland. The Devolution of power in Scottland in 1997 was part of the Labour Manifesto and was a promise made after the failure of the first referendum due to the low voter turn out. ...read more.


Although the majority vote was 63.49% the turnout was considerebly low at 36.51% meaning the referendum isn't very legitimate, but the proposal was passed non the less. Finally, in 2011, one of the most catastrophic referendums was denied, the AV referendum. Av was a bad compromise proposed by the Conservatives to the Liberal Democrats in the coalition, which the Liberals didn't want but had to accept anyway. The vote was a no majority with 67.9 Percent voting against the referendum than yes. The AV referendum had a large "No" campaign run, and was made out to be confusing and very ununderstandable. It could be argued because not even the Liberal Democrats wanted AV that it was doomed to fail from the start. Every constituency in the UK had a NO majority. In the UK, direct democracy is something that is used and played with like a play toy of government, usually used as a tool to gain popularity and nothing more. More direct democracy should definitely be implemented in the UK. The government tend to only propose referendums on things that will benefit them more and help them gain popularity or to bind the next government, as although UK referenda are not permenantly bindable and can be overturned by the next parliament, to do is severly frowned upon. ...read more.


This causes them to follow a recurring theme of party patriotism rather than conveying the true "wants" of society and the electorate, once again returning the the theme of the Iraq war. The conflict of interest between representatives in representative democracy can also be seen to be made less substantial in direct democracy - a example of this would be that representatives often get to vote on their own salaries, This does not support what the electorate thinks! It is the opposite. It is clear that representatives will always place the nature of themselves first, the wants of the electorate second, as was done in the expenses scandel, where politicians took the peoples money for every little thing possible, including but not limited to holiday homes, rubber ducks, condoms and bath plugs. Elected representatives often recruit incompetent individuals to positions of power depending on their loyalty to party leaders as opposed to a direct democracy, where everybody votes for people they think can do the job. The lack of accountability of representative actions in the case of not representing the interests of the people can also be punished by recalls of proposals and ideas. All the arguments for increasing direct democracy show that through more direct democracy, a fairer, more legitimate, more binding and more accountable governmental system is attained, with public order and opinion coinciding with the will of Government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. priministers power

    Unfavourable economic circumstances; a divided party; incompetence; bad luck; personal weaknesses - all contributed to Major's problems. The power of the Prime Minister is clearly conditional. * The Blair Experience - Tony Blair has attempted to exercise tight control of the machinery of government and his 'honeymoon' period was the longest on record.

  2. Can parliament bind it's successors with the provision in the Northern Ireland Act 1998, ...

    (See 'doctrine of implied repeal' later.) There are differing arguments over what the requirement of a poll in an Act means for future Parliaments and their ability to be sovereign. Sir Ivor Jennings holds the view that the requirement of a poll to repeal the Act is a change in

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    do in fact support the original hypothesis of the investigation, with the majority of those who have lost their faith in the government seemingly due to the scandalous behaviour of the politicians. However after writing my recommendations I think that the investigation was slightly flawed, and that the results that have been found are probably biased and over-exaggerated.

  2. Apart from referendums, explain three ways in which democracy in the UK could be ...

    How and why do pressure groups seek to influence public opinion? Pressure groups can help make change by their methods that they use to try and influence decision making within the government. These methods can be legal or illegal.

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the various ways in which participation and democracy could be ...

    Therefore, given the widespread evidence of fraud and inherent risks of security and secrecy that cannot realistically be overcome, at least not anytime soon, many are firmly against postal voting becoming more widely used. Furthermore, with the UK being at the forefront of technological advancement, E-voting is widely seen as

  2. What Is A Referendum? Give Three Examples of UK Referendums. Evaluate the Main Arguments ...

    ? in which better informed representatives are supposed to make decisions on the basis of deliberation and debate. In comparison to politicians, the general public is poorly informed, often indifferent, inexperienced and susceptible to baseless rhetoric. There is the argument therefore that their capacity to make sound judgement is lesser

  1. What is a Referendum and what are the arguments against them?

    By electing, its an official notion that we trust them to conduct, obviously voting the party who's manifesto we are partial to.

  2. Define Direct Democracy. What are the advantages and disadvantages of referendums?

    2005 were the lowest since 1918, 2001 having just a 59.4% turnout. There is also a decline in party membership from two million in the 1950's and 1960's, to 515,000 in 2008. However, if referendums were employed, many people think that they would stimulate active citizenship, and less political apathy,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work