• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reform of the judiciary has made it a powerful check on the executive. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ?Reform of the judiciary has made it a powerful check on the executive.? How far do you agree with this statement? The political function of the judiciary is to act as a check upon the executive by upholding the rule of law. The judiciary is there to prevent the arbitrary abuse of power by the government. In order to do this the judiciary must be independent of the executive or else it becomes an instrument of executive power, as in dictatorships. The history of the relationship between the executive and the judiciary in Britain is a complicated one. There have been some elements of that relationship that clearly sought to preserve judicial independence while others seemed to undermine the principle: the position of the Lord Chancellor is an obvious example. The idea that the executive should be separate from the judiciary was first mentioned by Montesquieu in Spirit of the Laws. Reforms introduced by the Labour government after 1997 had the express intention of increasing the independence of the judiciary: abolition of the position of Lord Chancellor; creation of a Ministry of Justice; establishment of an independent judicial appointments body; the creation of the Human Rights Act. ...read more.

Middle

Judges also face scrutiny from within their own profession. The legal profession is what is called self-regulating; their actions are scrutinised by the Law society. Lawyers are also not trained by the state as elsewhere in Europe. Judges must explain all their rulings in great detail. The Kilmuir Rules encourages judges to not be public figures. Moreover, the judicial appointments commission, which was established in 2006 after the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act, deals independently with the prospective appointments for the judiciary. They had previously been appointed by the Prime Minister, which was not very democratic as he could appoint judges sympathetic to his views. This has resulted in a number of very independent-minded judges emerging at senior levels. Many of these judges feel they do have a politically important role. Several of these judges are also willing to use the media to express their views. Furthermore, the EU has an impact on the ability of the judiciary to be a powerful check on the executive. The Social Chapter of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty transferred a lot control over employment and other social rights over to the EU. In these areas the UK judiciary is required to enforce such laws and interpret their meaning. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another reason why reform of the judiciary has not made it a powerful check on the executive is that Cameron has the power to veto decisions made by the Judicial Appointments Commission. However, this is a theoretical problem that had not yet occurred. The government retains control of the legal system through the Justice Ministry. This does not constitute direct control, but suggests a good deal of interference. Moreover, subjudice has been breached in the past. In recent years there has been an increasing tendency for politicians to enter into open political dialogue with judges over such issues as sentencing policy and the protection of rights. This may result in indirect pressure being placed on the judiciary. In 2007 the Home Secretary John Reid openly criticised the decision not to deport the murderer of head mast Philip Lawrence. Previous Home Secretaries have criticised the decisions releasing 9 Afghan hijackers in 2003 and for releasing terrorist suspects from Belmarsh prison in 2005. To conclude, the judiciary remains central to British politics and is vital if democracy is to be upheld. It is a powerful check on the executive for the reasons outlined in this essay, such as? It is a channel where the people are able to question the government and the reforms have made it even more powerful as a check on the executive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Discuss the indepedence of the UK Judiciary

    Judges cannot be independent if they are not neutral and vice versa. Judicial neutrality means that judges should be neutral in their approach to the law, and in result to apply laws passed by Parliament in an impartial, unbiased and technical manner.

  2. To what extent are judges neutral and independent?

    overlaps between the executive and the judiciary as he is a major part of the government as well as the head of the courts system. This is a theoretical risk; he could technically manipulate judges, cases and appointments, however this is largely unlikely, as with appointments, any obvious bias or meddling would soon be uprooted and damage the government.

  1. Which do you consider to be the more powerful chief executive in his or ...

    Parliament, he must impress his MPs and not batter them into submission. Indeed, whips are not always powerful. This is especially true to MPs who have retired from senior posts and no longer have ambitions of gaining promotion. For instance, retired Prime Minister Edward Heath slotted into this category and as such could not be coerced by the whips.

  2. How effective is Parliament as a check on the executive?

    Backbenchers within the governing party will usually tow the lie. They rarely speak out, criticise or rebel against Government policy even if they disagree with it. They will still vote for legislation they disagree with. Conservative and Lib Dem MP's will support the coalition even if their proposal goes against their own beliefs.

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    0 Representation and evaluation of data Below is a bar chart showing the age range of the participants in a more visual way. As you can see, the chart suggests that the older that the person was the more likely they were to fill out the questionnaire, however this may

  2. The Vampires Attack As he walked up the rickety ...

    He nodded and told her where it was. As she got off the phone she looked surprised. "He seemed delighted. He says that we've been a great help and that the body will be removed very soon." * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  1. "Constitutional reform had gone too far, or not far enough?" Discuss

    This is a possible reason for Prime Minister, David Cameron, attempting to dictate the referendum concerning Scottish Independence. The formation of the Scottish Parliament-a result of devolution-has limited the power of the British government over subjects such as education and health in devolved areas.

  2. Explain two criticisms of judicial review as a check on the executive.

    Secondly, in the majority of cases reviews find in favour of the executive due, some would argue, to a pro-executive stance on the part of judges. In 2011, it was 174 victories - that's 16 out of every 1,000 cases.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work