• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26

Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

REGULATION 2560/2001 ON CROSS-BORDER PAYMENTS IN EUROPE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Arguments for and against 3 The case for the regulation 3 The case against the regulation 4 Implementation in the context of general EU governance 6 Technical aspects 8 Rivalry in the payment industry 12 Economic background 13 Conclusion 15 References 18 Appendix A - The regulation in full text 21 Appendix B - Teamwork 25 Appendix C - Statement on grading 25 INTRODUCTION The widely acknowledged aim of the European Union is to ensure increasing integration between its member states. The most important field on which integration takes place is the economy. In the treaties of Maastricht 1992, a milestone in economic integration was brought on its way; the euro. When it was introduced as book money in 1999 and when it replaced national coins and banknotes in 2002, experts and politicians were expecting a huge leap forward in the integration process. While the full effects still are difficult to assess, there is also agreement that other factors and obstacles to the free flow of capital must be removed in order for the Euro to unleash its full potential. One such obstacle is the high prices that banks charge on international money transfers. The prices are in sharp contrast to the extremely low ones charged domestically and are thus at odds with the idea of a European domestic market. To change this undesirable situation, the EU first tried to lobby the banks to change their pricing and when this was not successful, it enacted regulation 2560/2001 "on cross-border payments in Euros" that "lays down rules on cross-border payments in euro in order to ensure that charges for those payments are the same as those for payments in euro within a Member State." (see regulation in Appendix A) The regulation was enacted on December 19, 2001. In June 2002, Swedish authorities decided to extend to the Swedish Krona. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, an agreed on standards leaves the banks little incentive for competition on the customer level. Kemppainen (2003) identifies five market dynamics that can be applied to the payment industry. Tipping, excess momentum, path dependence, critical mass and underproductivity are all concepts that are to some extent applicable to the retail payment industry and foster a situation of cooperation in the market. By implementing Regulation 2560/2001 the EU tries to create a situation where a competition for the market arises. Apparently, the European Committee is of the opinion that the economies of scale that result from a common standard are more important than the decreased competition between the payment systems. Whether this results in an optimal situation is very hard to estimate; time will tell. The only thing that is certain is that customer prices of cross-border transfers have dropped significantly since Regulation 2560/2001. ECONOMIC BACKGROUND Giving a precise estimate of the impact of regulation 2560/2001 on the European economy is hard if not impossible. This is due to a number of reasons. First of all, there are still problems with the implementation and especially the enforcement of the regulation. Even though often prices for intra-European transfers have fallen dramatically, there are still cases where banks keep their old practices of double-charging and of taking high prices. However, the EU commission itself has no power to sanction such violations; this is left to national authorities (Bolkenstein, 2002). As a consequence, uncertainty of the customers and - more importantly - of the potential customers prevents a stronger use of European payment systems. Another factor making direct links to economic performance in Europe impossible is that the regulation happened in context with many other legislative and executive initiatives of the EU and national governments and with all different kinds of influences that are occurring simultaneously and that often have much stronger effects on the economy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Regulation on charges levied for payments made within a Member State, * the advisability of increasing the amount provided for in Article 6(1) to EUR 50 000 as from 1 January 2006, taking into account any consequences for undertakings. This report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for amendments. Article 9 Entry into force This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall also apply to cross-border payments made in the currency of another Member State when the latter notifies the Commission of its decision to extend the Regulation's application to its currency. The notification shall be published in the Official Journal by the Commission. The extension shall take effect 14 days after the said publication. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 19 December 2001. For the European Parliament The President N. FONTAINE For the Council The President A. NEYTS-UYTTEBROECK APPENDIX B - TEAMWORK The following division has been used in writing: introduction -- Thorben the case for the regulation -- Thorben arguments against the regulation -- Bas implementation in the context of general EU governance -- Thorben technical aspects -- Bas rivalry in the payment industry -- Bas economic background -- Thorben conclusion -- Bas APPENDIX C - STATEMENT ON GRADING All members participated equally in the work of the team and grading should be uniform. 1 Although Mr. Arnold subtly criticises Regulation 2560/2001, he ends his speech on a high note by indicating the measures taken by the banks to comply with the regulation and stating that the banks will be happy to take further steps towards integration in the future. 2 Cheques are considered are very inefficient means of payment and should be discouraged as much as possible according to the European Central Bank (The Economist, 2004). ?? ?? ?? ?? Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    In all these roles, the ECJ is the highest authority, and its decisions are binding and final." (Dinan 1999: p192) 3 The ECJ can be described as a European version of the US Supreme Court. Its decisions are final, apply to both member states and individuals, and are not subject to appeal.

  2. Examine the reasons for the different attitudes to European integration in Denmark, Finland, Norway ...

    trade in industrial goods as opposed to farming and fish in which Norway had substantial interest.8 'Norway has applied for full membership of the EC and the EU four times, reached the point of finalisation twice and rejected full membership in a public referendum twice' (Miles 1996).

  1. I shall use a team of my choice as a sporting example of group ...

    > Personality: is the manager a naturally aggressive person. There are a few theories on the performance of a team: (Steiner's model 1972): Steiner says that how well a team performs depends on how good they could perform minus egos, greed in terms of playing, motivation and co-ordination.

  2. Disneyland Resort Paris, Case Study

    specially when taking into consideration: - The negative effect of the past economic recession on household disposable income and spending patterns. - The cheapest 2 days and 1 night package for two adults at the resort costs at least �478.

  1. What evidence is there of the emergence of new forms of racism within Europe?

    (Anthias; 2002) He believes that the increase of the community increases the "non-acceptance and undesirability for 'Others'; the foreigners, the migrants, the enemies, within and from outside" (Anthias; 2002) Whereas the old form of racism had a definite emphasis on colonisation, particularly with the writings of Von Trietscke who believed that "Germany

  2. What Are The Functions Of The Four EU Institutions? How Are European Laws Made?

    The existence of the ECJ is as follows. It ensures that the law is observed in the interpretation and application is identified in Article 220 of the European Community Treaty. By doing this, it can three main objectives, the first being that is ensures that in application and interpretation the EU law is observed.

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    Through time, CFSP becomes the main forum for foreign policy discussions, common declarations and decisions that helps to develop the understanding of a European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP). This forum has developed many policies regarding the common policy issues, but it acted comparatively slowly to come up with an agreed common security and defense policy.

  2. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    Reunification talks started in 2002, but the June deadline passed without result. In March 11, 2003 UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan announced the end of efforts to reunite island and withdrawal of peace envoy. The Republic of Cyprus signed accession treaty with the EU in April 16, 2003 and the following

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work