• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Representative democracy is more ideal than direct democracy. Discuss

Free essay example:

I believe that a representative democracy is more ideal than a direct democracy as for starters a representative democracy is better suited to dealing with a large electorate. Direct democracy may work very well among a small group of people, but the larger the group the more difficult it is to run effectively. Representative democracy eliminates this difficulty by operating on a much smaller scale the majority of the time. Also, the complexity of many political issues would make some of them difficult for the average voter to understand. Political issues can be exceptionally complicated and take MPs a lot of time and consultation with experts to fully understand themselves, before they can be considered informed enough to vote. Educating the whole electorate on such issues would be exceptionally difficult for a number of reasons, and if an uninformed electorate were to vote on issues the results could be incredibly damaging. Making it a lot more difficult for a direct democracy to inform citizens on a complicated issue. Another point in favour of representative democracy is that the average individual voter would put his or her needs before those of society as a whole. This self-interest is perfectly natural, but if a law that benefits a smaller group does not benefit a larger group then that law is not likely to be passed. Representative democracy is a lot less work. Most people do not really want to vote all the time on political issues that don't always affect them, or may require a lot of understanding in order to cast a meaningful vote. Switzerland requires about 10 referenda per year. This is the main criticism of direct democracy from people subject to it. Voting for a representative who agrees with you takes less effort, doesn't require you to do anything about issues that don't concern you and does not require you to learn about complex issues. Complex issues can be sorted out by professionals.

However, there are arguments that go against representative democracy such as the Majority of people do not trouble to fully inform themselves on the topics. The complexities of modern government require careful consideration of all the facts available, reports from all sides, scientific and rational analysis, a lack of reaction and a willingness to consider the long term solution and to not put self-interest first. The majority of people do not have the time, or the inclination, to make a rational well considered judgement. Another point is that it is a one party system, it is not the parties that should be making the policy suggestions, it is the people. The party/candidate acts on the voters' behalf, but they rarely takes notice to what the country has to say and generally stick to what they believe. Representative democracy allows the personal agenda of the ruling classes to cloud the agenda of what is right for the citizens of this country.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Politics Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    They tried to show that the more productive the system became, the more difficult it would be to make it function: The more goods it accumulated, the less use it would have for these goods; the more people it trained, the less it could utilize their talents.

  2. Assess the advantages of direct and representative democracy

    But despite this, direct democracy has drawbacks in the sense that it's only feasible in small areas and wouldn't work on a national scale as it comprises so much personal interaction to make decisions. What is the use in having a perfectly democratic nation if all matters of public interest

  1. Did Athenian democracy erode popular belief in divination? If so why?

    Thucydides asserts that: 'The result of the excessive enthusiasm of the majority was that the few who actually opposed the expedition were afraid of being thought unpatriotic if they voted against it, and therefore kept quiet.'15 This illustrates one of the main reasons why the Sicilian expedition failed; that is,

  2. Does democracy bring peace?

    and glorified system of democracy to undemocratic nations has often lead to America becoming involved in costly and counterproductive foreign interventions which have rarely ended with the results that they had originally hoped to obtain. The two prime examples of this are Vietnam and Iraq.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Regarding the post-election state of the "party-in-government," there are two aspects representing continuity with the past and one notably significant change, none of which bode well for the strengthening of Russia's party system. As in the past, there was considerable reshuffling of party allegiances in the Duma immediately following the election.

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    There is some dispute as to whether the Council of the Areopagus had existed before the time of Solon or if he set it up. But as Plutarch argues (Plutarch, Solon; p: 61), Solon's own laws drafted by himself about disenfranchisement of citizens hint that it probably existed before his time.

  1. Advantages of direct and representative democracy

    The people chose who should represent them so they have some say in how the country should be run. Another advantage of Representative democracy is that there are MPs for each constituency, so they will be aware of the issues in the area.

  2. Participation is the essence of democracy Discuss

    The term direct democracy originated in Athens of the 40,000 free slaves in the 5th Century. The women and current slaves were excluded. Switzerland has adopted Participatory democracy which is a type of direct democracy. The citizens have more participation in referendums and are able to be more involved in politics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work