• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rousseau is commonly called a `radical` thinker. Does the term plausibly describe his approach to law?

Extracts from this document...


Rousseau is commonly called a `radical` thinker. Does the term plausibly describe his approach to law? Rousseau was the presenter of challenging idea about human beings, nature, politics and history. Whether he was found interesting or disturbing, it is impossible not to be affected by his ideas. In this essay it is necessary to explore whether these ideas make him radical as some would suggest or merely makes him , like other thinkers a renowned philosopher, with ideas that he believed would make the world a better place. Rousseau was very definitive about his views of how the world should have been, which is why he was most likely labelled a radical thinker, he heavily attacked the new science of politics that was headed by the likes of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. In the Discourse on Inequality he rejected the previous attempts to account for the origins of government describing what human beings must have been like in the state of nature. Hobbes had recounted the progress of mankind from a `horrible state of war` with each other and Locke' had said it was a `very precarious, very unsafe` existence that had led to a more secure and organised way of life. ...read more.


Natural man had been sufficient and relied only on himself, but the man in the civil society had become dependant on his fellows in countless ways, even in the point of living in the `opinion of others`. The modern man was surrounded by philosophy, civilisation and codes of morality, but had little to show of himself but `honour without virtue, reason without wisdom, and pleasure without happiness`. The radical character of Rousseau's political thought is nowhere more apparent than in his treatment of reason and human nature. He rejected the older ideas of a natural law discoverable through right reason (Aristotle, Locke) and instead insisted that humans had not been endows with reason, that they were not naturally social or political beings. He was adamant that natural law and God had made reason innate in a person, otherwise would not have needed to be taught or to learn things. Rousseau's charge at the beginning of The Social Contract is that virtually all existing governments were illegitimate: "Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains." Having raised the issue of legitimacy, Rousseau turned to his most ambitious project to date: the question of how better governments might be established. ...read more.


However, looking at Rousseau one can predict what he would say, that we are not free at all. Instead, we may lack any initiative, we often have difficulty interacting with each other in any meaningful way and that our decisions and behaviour are usually dictated to by us by consumer culture that discourages individual thought. His argument is that we seemed to have lost the community spirit that makes people want to be together, citizens in his idea republic would not be forced into the community but they would agree to it for their mutual benefit. Overall it can be said that Rousseau was a radical thinker who put forward revolutionary theories. He put forward the theory that the government was based on a contract, that is the consent of the governed, and that society should be led by the general will, for him the best government was the republic. Because it was sensitive to the desires of the people. Rousseau clearly promotes a perfect society in the Social Contract which according to his theory would eliminate all society problems. Although such a society would be wonderful, the ideas would not work, quite simply because of the wants and desires of the human for himself and his family. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    The job of political theory is to read these texts and see if any of these ideas can be applied to the world as it is today. In many senses the Lockean doctrine, however insufficient it may be in attempting to explain all the roles of government suffers the same

  2. "...the gulf between how one should live and how one does live is so ...

    However, Machiavelli believes a successful leader must also have 'fortuna', or fortune. He considers fortuna to be an absolute necessity: "...Francesco Sforza...by using the right methods and consummate skill [virtu], started out as a private citizen and ended up Duke of Milan...On the other hand Cesare Borgia, who was called

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    by delegation, or whether such exercise is for a set term, or in perpetuity, such a power is not a sovereign power, even if there is no mention of such words as representative, lieutenant, governor, or regent, in the letters of appointment, or even if such powers are a consequence of the normal working of the laws of the country."(VIII,viii)

  2. Politics A: Analysing Theories of the State and Individual - Hobbes and Locke

    Once a person had appropriated nature in this way, other people had no right to interfere, and the owner had a right to prevent them from doing so. But there was a limitation on this natural right to appropriate nature, to appropriate more than you needed was wrong we had to be aware of others have a social conscience.

  1. Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

    In other words an attempt should be made to disprove a hypothesis that already exists. Popper gave the example of the hypothesis, "all swans are white". He claims that we should now engage in a deductive process, desperately searching for a non-white swan.

  2. Can feminism be thought of as a theory of law or, otherwise, fundamental in ...

    feminism as having no legal influence, as it is clear to see from these that support for such movements is vast and comes in various forms, all of which attack the same enemy, patriarchy, albeit in differing manners. These differing methods are accentuated by recent developments and movements in society,

  1. "Responsible for remarkable and radical reforms." How justified is this verdict on the Liberal ...

    was attacked even from the Left because it was illiberal and compulsory, because it infringed the rights of workers, of Unions, Friendly Societies and insurance companies. Remarkable they might have been, but these social reforms had not come out of the blue.

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    a moral reason to do so the latter is political obligation. So although Hobbes (1) defines one as having an obligation to the sovereign by virtue of having made a valid covenant to obey him and (2) gives an argument for why fulfilling such ?obligations? is required by instrumental

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work