• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Set out the key points of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin's theory of the state and the significant influence of Karl Marx on Lenin's theory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

DAVID TOLAN POLITICS ESSAY L.O.1 This essay aims to set out the key points of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin's theory of the state and the significant influence of Karl Marx on Lenin's theory.For this reason, background will be provided on Marx's theories,and the major influences on Lenin identified.The essay will also look at the significance of these theories for the individual living in the state. . Before looking in more detail at the views of Marx and Lenin it is necessary to define what is meant by the state.A general definition of the state sees it as a set of institution's with distinct geographical boundaries and the right to exercise it's authority over it's people.Marx's definition takes things further by describing the state as the historical struggle between classes,and as a tool of repression,representing the interests of the ruling classes .He also believed that the most important function of the state was either to reflect or reinforce class division in society,and stated in the communist manifesto published in1848 that,"the executive of a modern state is but a committee for managing the resources of the bourgeoise". An important aspect of Marx's theory of the state is the idea of historical materialism.Marx was influenced by the writings of German philosopher Georg.W.F.Hegel(1770-1831) who claimed that history occurs through a dialetic,or clash of opposing forces. ...read more.

Middle

there was the existence of social classes and that the change from one stage to another was always a revolutionary one,i.e the rising working class would challenge the ruling class,and that they in turn would become the new ruling class, like the French revolution for example. Marx said that the revolution is followed by the "dictatorship of the proletariat",when the workers take over the state and all its instuments of coercion and use these instruments against the capitalist class.As the state is now being used by the workers against the capitalists its substance changes.It becomes the instrument of the many against the few,as the means of production become socialised ,classes disappear since there can be no classes without property.Without classes,there is no need for coercion.The dictatorship paves the way towards its own disappearance and to the establishment of a classless and stateless society.(Macridis&Hulliung,1996:107). Lenin,which was actually a pseudonym,his real surname was Ulyanov was a Russian Marxist theorist and also an active revolutionary.His contributions to Marxism were his theory of the revolutionary or vanguard party,outlined in What is to be done?(1902),his analysis of colonialism as an economic phenomena,described in Imperialism,the highest stage of capitalism(1916),and his firm commitment to the 'insurrectionary road to socialism' developed in State and Revolution in 1917.(Heywood:1997:75) Lenin faithfully accepted the body of Marx's work and devoted most of his life defending Marx's ideas.It is said that Lenin gave Marxist ideology and revolutionary tactics ...read more.

Conclusion

means neither more nor less than unlimited power,resting directly on force,not limited by anything,not restricted by any law or absolute rules.Nothing else but that. (Macridis&Hulliung:1996:111) .Following this sees the socialisation of the means of production and the abolition of private property,which in turn leads to the final slow "withering away of the state" as an instrument of coercion and oppression and the emergence of a stateless classless society. So in summation,although Marx and Lenin held similar beliefs,they both had differing ideas on how to achieve the same goal of a classless and stateless society.While Marx was content to wait for events to unfold and believed that society would eventually progress along the road to revolution at some point,Lenin held the belief that the proletariat had to be led along the road to revolution by a leader.Both of these theories benefit the individual in society in similar ways but from Marx's viewpoint the individual may have to put up with oppression from the capitalist classes for a long time before the build-up of a revolutionary force to oppose them. Whereas in Lenin's view a small but well organised group could take control at the earliest possible opportunity in the name of the masses.But both Marx and Lenin agreed that the outcome of revolution would benefit the individual as they both shared the same vision of a stateless classless society,with no need for any sort of state control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Liberalism Notes

    * 'Philosopher radicals' (or utilitarians) such as Bentham were in touch with progressive Whigs; Whitbread and Brougham constituted the progressive wing of the parl. party. Cobbett's radical populism harked back to pre-industrial age; Bright (Quaker manufacturer) belonged to new generation of post 1832 MPs - himself displaced by new breed

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    The main fault of Marx's theory is that he underestimates the power of religion on the masses. People need God, even if he is simply created, as he is a model of perfect human behaviour and something to aim for.

  1. An analysis of the Marxist Perspective on Religion

    A famous quote of Stalin shows just how heavily he was influenced: 'Religion is a kind of spiritual gin in which the slaves of capital drown their human shape and their claims to any decent life.' (8) The similarities between this and Marx's thoughts printed in the 'Manifesto of the

  2. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    While Rogers sees the common human condition as one of incongruence between self and experience, this does not minimize his ultimate belief in the autonomy of human beings. Rogers (1977, p15) sees the human being as: "capable of evaluating the outer and inner situation, understanding herself in its context, making

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Federal systems represent ways of organizing and managing diversity. In the realm of politics, experience has shown that these systems are therefore much more viable means of managing large nations than are highly centralized unitary systems. In fact, most of these nations are of the federal, not the unitary, variety-even the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China in their so-called totalitarian heyday.

  2. Deontology- a theory based purely on obligation or duty.

    The wrongs within the mind could be easily recognized due to a great reliance on rules and moral justice, not just the consequences or ending results of the situations. For example, the laws of each country are based on a consensus of moral and religious beliefs.

  1. Describe Jean Baudrillard's concept of the orders of simulacra in relation to design in ...

    This creates a pun between the whistling of a kettle and the singing of bird but more importantly, its similar visual appearance (i.e. the wings of the bird and the outstretched arms and gown of the girl) makes a reference of Rolls Royce cars.

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    One king should make the decisions, write the laws, and control the masses. Locke, on the other hand, felt that the people should somewhat run the government. He believed that the people should have a say in everything the government decided, including who ruled over the country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work