• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

SHOULD BRITAIN ADOPT A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SHOULD BRITAIN ADOPT A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION? Currently Britain's constitution is an unwritten one. This doesn't mean that it is literally unwritten but that it is set down in many different documents. Additionally there is no set bill of rights as there is in The United States of America. The constitution of the U.S.A. is written and codified. In America a bill of citizen's rights was set down in the mid 1770's and is entrenched in the constitution. In order to change the bill of rights a two thirds majority is required in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. A consequence of this is that it is very hard to change the U.S. constitution. It is, in fact, so difficult that since its creation, it has been changed only twenty six times. Ten of these changes were in the first five years of its existence. A constitution can be described as "a set of rights, powers and procedures that regulate relations between public authorities and individual citizens." Put simply, a constitution governs political behaviour. Andrew Heywood describes the constitution as "a set of rules that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government, regulate the relationships between them and define the relationship between the state and the individual." ...read more.

Middle

This area of the constitution is especially important in the sphere of civil liberties. Authoritative commentaries are also a key area of the constitution. These are books and writings which are widely as sources of guidance on the interpretation of constitutional rules. An example of such an authoritative commentary would be T. Erskine May's "Treatise on the laws, priveliges, proceedings and usage of Parliament," the classic guide to Parlimentary procedures and rights, used by the Speaker of The House of Commons. Finally, conventions are established customs and practice which are considered binding but lack the force of law. These apply particularly to the practices of the Crown and the Cabinet. It is convention that; the Speaker of The House must be impartial, the Cabinet is collectively responsible and that the Prime Minster be a member of the Commons. These five sources are overridden, however, by E.U. law which has precedence over U.K. law, when the two conflict. Under E.U. law, the U.K. courts are required to strike down laws which contravene E.U. law. E.U. law took this precedence in1972 when Britain signed The Treaty of Rome. One significant and well known example of E.U. law taking precedence over U.K. ...read more.

Conclusion

and a strong government based on strong party activism. They believe the party should mandate the government in a "bottom up" approach, at odds with the Tories' "top-down" approach. Socialists believe that a bill of rights and electoral reform would grant too much power to judges and the E.U. and that it would constrain Socialism. Liberals follow a similar train of thought to Socialists but are, however, more open to reform. They would favour a new written constitution and place an emphasis on the centrality of the individual. As such, the Liberals would like to see devolution on a greater scale along with electoral reform, proportional representation greatly increasing the number of Liberal seats in parliament. Liberals ultimately believe that the current "rules of the game" are too partisan and there is too little, if any consensual decision making. Ultimately, I believe that in order for there to be a significant change to the British constitution, in terms of changing its format, a referendum would be necessary. Our current constitution and system does, however seem adequate and serves its purpose. Here the old adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" seems to apply neatly. America's Constitution seems outdated when one considers that it has been changed only sixteen times in the last two hundred and fourteen years. Overall, flexibility appears to be an attractive quality. ?? ?? ?? ?? Will Topps ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. To what extent has the Constitution protected civil liberties in America?

    This shows that before Salim Hamdem appealed, he was going to be tried illegally and so an infringement on his civil liberties occurred. On the other hand, it could be shown that the Supreme Court in this case were protecting his rights, as it was unconstitutional to allow him to be tried via a military commission.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    Democrats believe that war is a valid option, but should only be used as a last resort when other options have been exhausted.

  1. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    In conjuction with this there are a few disadvantages. Advantages to having a written constitution in the United Kingdom A written constitution would allow the British people to appeal to the courts with a written document to back up their claims; a codified document is a point of reference and

  2. The British Constitution

    Parliament was recalled with requests for war funding although this was queried and only lasted a matter of weeks. In May 1646 Charles placed himself in the hands of the Scottish Army. This led to the second civil war in 1648, which resulted in Cromwell's victory.

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    There is an emphasis on the separation of powers within the US constitution. The UK constitution does not create this separation of powers. Although in the UK the judiciary is largely independent, members of the executive are members of parliament making them indirectly part of the legislative branch.

  2. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    Implied Powers Powers not given to the government directly through the constitution, but are implied. These powers fall under the Elastic Clause in Section 8 of Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution. This document lets the government create "necessary and proper" programs/laws and retain them, such as creating the Air Force.

  1. Federalism vs. Devolution

    There are several negative consequences with federalism, beginning with the massive variation there can be in state laws, over key issues such as crime and punishment, drinking ages and marriage laws. Secondly, it creates a complex legal system, with both national and state courts each with their own agenda.

  2. Power in America. The idea that the rich run America has been encompassed in ...

    In the United States, the means of production are obviously held by those who have money. However, socialism differs from the elite theory because it insists that control over the means of the production is the only source of power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work