• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


SHOULD BRITAIN ADOPT A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION? Currently Britain's constitution is an unwritten one. This doesn't mean that it is literally unwritten but that it is set down in many different documents. Additionally there is no set bill of rights as there is in The United States of America. The constitution of the U.S.A. is written and codified. In America a bill of citizen's rights was set down in the mid 1770's and is entrenched in the constitution. In order to change the bill of rights a two thirds majority is required in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. A consequence of this is that it is very hard to change the U.S. constitution. It is, in fact, so difficult that since its creation, it has been changed only twenty six times. Ten of these changes were in the first five years of its existence. A constitution can be described as "a set of rights, powers and procedures that regulate relations between public authorities and individual citizens." Put simply, a constitution governs political behaviour. Andrew Heywood describes the constitution as "a set of rules that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government, regulate the relationships between them and define the relationship between the state and the individual." ...read more.


This area of the constitution is especially important in the sphere of civil liberties. Authoritative commentaries are also a key area of the constitution. These are books and writings which are widely as sources of guidance on the interpretation of constitutional rules. An example of such an authoritative commentary would be T. Erskine May's "Treatise on the laws, priveliges, proceedings and usage of Parliament," the classic guide to Parlimentary procedures and rights, used by the Speaker of The House of Commons. Finally, conventions are established customs and practice which are considered binding but lack the force of law. These apply particularly to the practices of the Crown and the Cabinet. It is convention that; the Speaker of The House must be impartial, the Cabinet is collectively responsible and that the Prime Minster be a member of the Commons. These five sources are overridden, however, by E.U. law which has precedence over U.K. law, when the two conflict. Under E.U. law, the U.K. courts are required to strike down laws which contravene E.U. law. E.U. law took this precedence in1972 when Britain signed The Treaty of Rome. One significant and well known example of E.U. law taking precedence over U.K. ...read more.


and a strong government based on strong party activism. They believe the party should mandate the government in a "bottom up" approach, at odds with the Tories' "top-down" approach. Socialists believe that a bill of rights and electoral reform would grant too much power to judges and the E.U. and that it would constrain Socialism. Liberals follow a similar train of thought to Socialists but are, however, more open to reform. They would favour a new written constitution and place an emphasis on the centrality of the individual. As such, the Liberals would like to see devolution on a greater scale along with electoral reform, proportional representation greatly increasing the number of Liberal seats in parliament. Liberals ultimately believe that the current "rules of the game" are too partisan and there is too little, if any consensual decision making. Ultimately, I believe that in order for there to be a significant change to the British constitution, in terms of changing its format, a referendum would be necessary. Our current constitution and system does, however seem adequate and serves its purpose. Here the old adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" seems to apply neatly. America's Constitution seems outdated when one considers that it has been changed only sixteen times in the last two hundred and fourteen years. Overall, flexibility appears to be an attractive quality. ?? ?? ?? ?? Will Topps ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. To what extent has the Constitution protected civil liberties in America?

    This shows that before Salim Hamdem appealed, he was going to be tried illegally and so an infringement on his civil liberties occurred. On the other hand, it could be shown that the Supreme Court in this case were protecting his rights, as it was unconstitutional to allow him to be tried via a military commission.

  2. The Referendum

    related to what we, the Irish people, want to say in our constitution about abortion. The liberal 'no' vote secured the narrowest of victories, and so the bill preventing the proposed amendment to make it more difficult for women to secure abortion, is set to become an act of parliament

  1. US constitution and reform

    This would encourage a more decisive system. It has also been suggested that there should be a six year term for the president which would strengthen his bargaining position. Critics also feel that a single party should control both Congress and the White House.

  2. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    > Codification:The constitution is written down in a single document, and so is organised into a clear set of principles and rules. We should learn from the US Constitution of 1787. There are many advantages of adopting a written constitution in Britain, as there are many pressure groups, political figures and ordinary people who believe that Britain should have one.

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    If Britain does choose to become more integrated with Europe, the British constitution could be surrendered for a European one. Some EU members favour the idea of a European scaffold of rules, yet equally there are adversaries. Cohn-Bendit is adamant on this issue, 'Europe must have its own constitution, it is essential to Europe' (Cohn-Bendit, 2000).

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems. Conservatives support limited government, limited taxation, and a balanced budget. Some admit the necessity of taxes, but insist that taxes should be low.

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    However, the ultimate reason I contend that this still proves that American ideals have not been corrupted is just because the situation has been recognized and rectified by the very structures that caused it. The logic? In the course of human events, all men make mistakes.

  2. The British Constitution

    The Monarch now has a constitutional role, which means that their actions are governed by convention. It is convention and tradition, along with Authoritative works from Walter Bagehot, Erskine May and AV Dicey that are the Non-legal sources of the uncodified British Constitution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work