• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain join the Euro? A report into the pro's and cons.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Britain join the Euro? A report into the pro's and cons By Katie Clarke Introduction One of the main changes in recent years in the world economy is the appearance of a new sole currency for 12 European countries: Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Sweden and Greece. The two main reasons for building a new currency are, firstly, to rival the US dollar, and, secondly, to strengthen and unite the European economy. There is a long pre-history of building the single European currency with a several unsuccessful attempts. Because of this previous experience, and previous monetary losses, countries such as the UK and Denmark are undecided as to whether to join the European single currency. This report will analyse if the UK should join the Euro or stay with the Pound. History > 1946- The European Federalists Union is put into place in Paris, France. > 1948- The custom convention between Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands comes into force. > 1949- The Western Union Treaty (Brussels Treaty) is signed by Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. > 1949- France, Great Britain and the Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands) ...read more.

Middle

Tourism brings much capital into the UK and governments are always keen to expand any programme that will encourage tourism. As a result of the UK joining the Euro there would be a vastly reduced transaction cost for traders, with savings estimated at around �2 billion annually. These savings come from not having to pay commission or maintain hedge funds to guard against currency instability. At present the British sterling is very strong against other currencies and this greatly affects their imports and exports. Joining the Euro would result in exchange rate stability for over half of UK trade. This would encourage higher levels of trade, as exporters and importers realised that their profit margin could no longer disappear with an unanticipated exchange rate movement. We must take into consideration that we have a major trade deficit with the EU, and that imports as well as exports will experience this new exchange rate stability. However, despite a lot of our trade being with members of the EU, we must not disregard the other 47% our trade. The Euro itself has been unstable against other currencies. An appreciation of the Euro against the dollar subsequent to our joining would mean that the UK's important trade with the USA would be at a disadvantage. ...read more.

Conclusion

This means that it will be much easier to get away with forgery, mainly because the Euro notes come in great variety and are not even all on the same paper. Detecting forgeries could be greatly complicated. At 500 Euros the largest note there is a high chance that criminals see this as a particularly attractive opportunity. Conclusions It is important to value and treasure our heritage, as that cannot be replaced. However, whether this should stand in the way of such a big issue I really doubt. I believe our culture to be strong enough to retain a real identity without the pound. Britain has much strength, economically and culturally, that should enable her to grow and become more prosperous. But this would undoubtedly be made easier by membership in a successful Euro zone. However, whether or not this is attainable is really the issue - can the differences between the members' economies be overcome? Is convergence possible? Will the Euro be successful? I would tentatively suggest that the answer to these questions is, in the long term, yes. On this basis I suggest that it is best for Britain to join soon. There is a real risk of failure and there will undoubtedly be problems in the short to medium term, but I feel it is worth the risk. http://www.theeurodebate.co.uk/ http://www.motorola.com/content/0,,335-648,00.html ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Should Britain Join the Euro

    However this is very short-termist and I don't feel it is a significant argument against joining. The main argument for membership is that of the benefits that removing exchange rate uncertainty will bring. If there was a common currency within Europe, businesses could be more confident about investment, as they

  2. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    *Frisian *German, spoken in Germane & Austria *Yiddish *Dutch/ Flemish, spoken in Denmark *Luxembourgish, spoken in Luxembourg The above shows the languages spoken in the EU member's states. Vast numbers of languages are spoken, as travel has been so easy as of the treaties so people can move around so easily.

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    As an independent 'Third Force' the EEC would be able to leave NATO, make friends with Russia, and become a stronger Europe. De Gaulle believed this could be done as long as Britain was not a member. Within the supranational community there was dispute, the Five wanted complete integration while

  2. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    President De Gaulle was mainly refusing Britain to join the EEC. Eventually president De Gaulle lost power and then when Britain applied for the third time they were accepted. Question 3 In this question I intent to write about the impact that the EEC had on Britain in the years

  1. Why is Britain hesitating about membership of EMU and what are the main issues?

    grudging falls thereafter, the recession had been prolonged and became a slump. The pound was also clearly overvalued, shown by the continued current account deficit even in the depth of recession. An even more cautionary tale is available from Italy, whose failure to devalue since 1987 combined with steady inflation

  2. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    The EU influences much of the tactics and strategies that Britain undertake, and furthermore, ones that they should adopt due to Britain's positioning as a member of the Union. The Union itself is highly present within Britain, such as it plays a predominant role in the "...allocation of resources and

  1. An examination of British policy with regard to European Unity during the period 1945 ...

    Such are the origins of European Unity and Britain's central part in it (Pilkington, 1995). Economic suability was seen as a fundamental pre-requisite for staving off the Soviet threat. In March 1947 Britain sought America's financial aid and political endorsement of its peacekeeping aims.

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Adapted from Commission on Payment and Settlement Sysstems (2003). total 26,852 34,311 48,824 The third small settlement system is S-Interpay, set up in 1994 by the German savings banks (Sparkassen) and their central institutions (Landesbanken), but it has extended since and now also includes (mainly savings) banks in other countries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work