• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain join the Euro? A report into the pro's and cons.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Britain join the Euro? A report into the pro's and cons By Katie Clarke Introduction One of the main changes in recent years in the world economy is the appearance of a new sole currency for 12 European countries: Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Sweden and Greece. The two main reasons for building a new currency are, firstly, to rival the US dollar, and, secondly, to strengthen and unite the European economy. There is a long pre-history of building the single European currency with a several unsuccessful attempts. Because of this previous experience, and previous monetary losses, countries such as the UK and Denmark are undecided as to whether to join the European single currency. This report will analyse if the UK should join the Euro or stay with the Pound. History > 1946- The European Federalists Union is put into place in Paris, France. > 1948- The custom convention between Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands comes into force. > 1949- The Western Union Treaty (Brussels Treaty) is signed by Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. > 1949- France, Great Britain and the Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands) ...read more.

Middle

Tourism brings much capital into the UK and governments are always keen to expand any programme that will encourage tourism. As a result of the UK joining the Euro there would be a vastly reduced transaction cost for traders, with savings estimated at around �2 billion annually. These savings come from not having to pay commission or maintain hedge funds to guard against currency instability. At present the British sterling is very strong against other currencies and this greatly affects their imports and exports. Joining the Euro would result in exchange rate stability for over half of UK trade. This would encourage higher levels of trade, as exporters and importers realised that their profit margin could no longer disappear with an unanticipated exchange rate movement. We must take into consideration that we have a major trade deficit with the EU, and that imports as well as exports will experience this new exchange rate stability. However, despite a lot of our trade being with members of the EU, we must not disregard the other 47% our trade. The Euro itself has been unstable against other currencies. An appreciation of the Euro against the dollar subsequent to our joining would mean that the UK's important trade with the USA would be at a disadvantage. ...read more.

Conclusion

This means that it will be much easier to get away with forgery, mainly because the Euro notes come in great variety and are not even all on the same paper. Detecting forgeries could be greatly complicated. At 500 Euros the largest note there is a high chance that criminals see this as a particularly attractive opportunity. Conclusions It is important to value and treasure our heritage, as that cannot be replaced. However, whether this should stand in the way of such a big issue I really doubt. I believe our culture to be strong enough to retain a real identity without the pound. Britain has much strength, economically and culturally, that should enable her to grow and become more prosperous. But this would undoubtedly be made easier by membership in a successful Euro zone. However, whether or not this is attainable is really the issue - can the differences between the members' economies be overcome? Is convergence possible? Will the Euro be successful? I would tentatively suggest that the answer to these questions is, in the long term, yes. On this basis I suggest that it is best for Britain to join soon. There is a real risk of failure and there will undoubtedly be problems in the short to medium term, but I feel it is worth the risk. http://www.theeurodebate.co.uk/ http://www.motorola.com/content/0,,335-648,00.html ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Should Britain Join the Euro

    However this is very short-termist and I don't feel it is a significant argument against joining. The main argument for membership is that of the benefits that removing exchange rate uncertainty will bring. If there was a common currency within Europe, businesses could be more confident about investment, as they

  2. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    *Frisian *German, spoken in Germane & Austria *Yiddish *Dutch/ Flemish, spoken in Denmark *Luxembourgish, spoken in Luxembourg The above shows the languages spoken in the EU member's states. Vast numbers of languages are spoken, as travel has been so easy as of the treaties so people can move around so easily.

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    As an independent 'Third Force' the EEC would be able to leave NATO, make friends with Russia, and become a stronger Europe. De Gaulle believed this could be done as long as Britain was not a member. Within the supranational community there was dispute, the Five wanted complete integration while

  2. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    The British government had thought without Britain the EEC would not be very successful. But by 1961 the relationship between the British and the EEC had changed. The British were asking to join but the EEC was` refusing to let them join.

  1. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    that there are clearly two differing arguments to the debate, one that increasing EU intervention is acceptable so long as Britain benefits from it, however, the other states that it is important to maintain this clear division, otherwise is will grow to threaten the existing British political order.

  2. Why is Britain hesitating about membership of EMU and what are the main issues?

    These problems are clearly illustrated by Britain's recent experience. In 1988, when the UK was only a "shadow" ERM member, the Government kept the pound down against the DM (Deutchesmark), cutting interest rates to that end. Base rates reached a low of 7.5% in the spring of 1988, with the result that the UK suffered an uncontrolled boom that year.

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Contrary to TARGET and TIPANET, all transactions are settled through one bank, Postgirot Bank of Sweden. Therefore, Eurogiro reaches a high degree of automation ('straight through processing'). Although the larger part of transactions that Eurogiro handles are low-value, the system can also be used for large-value transactions.

  2. Explain the different exchange rates and the advantage and disadvantages

    This government has a bit of intervention in to the market to influence the value of the exchange rate. The government intervenes and sets up limits to how far the exchange rate can rise and decrease. A fixed exchange rate is a exchange rate which is fixed by Government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work