• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain leave the European Union?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Britain leave the European Union? In 1973 Britain joined the EU meaning that they are protected from imports from abroad. For example if a firm in America wanted to import a product into the UK then they would have to pay a sum of money or a tariff. In the EU there is a rule that means that all members can trade freely with one another inside Europe without having to pay tax or any money for the import or export of their goods. But before 1973 Britain's industries were very poor and there was no reason why the government should do anything about it. Competition was low and this is why they did not. Britain originally joined the EU for economic reasons mainly to gain the advantage of having a free trade area. As soon as Britain did join they faced a big threat. The quality and output of goods in Britain was poor even though they provided for the rest of Europe, this meant that the firms making could fall behind and run out of business if they did not improve. ...read more.

Middle

It is thought to many people that these workers who come into the UK are asylum seekers and cost many ordinary British citizens their jobs. This is not true as these workers are highly skilled and do not seek asylum in Britain. This can be proved by the growing number of foreign workers who become say brain surgeons and professors. These people do not cost jobs because they cause industry to be pushed to keep up with the amount of people working in Britain. If it was true that foreigners cost jobs it would mean that every time a baby is born a job is lost and this is ridiculous. In fact without these free movement of labour industries would not grow. When Britain joined the EU in 1973 although countries belonging to it were not allowed to introduce tariffs to goods they subsidised or used a quota. A quota is a limit on the amount of imports per year. If Britain was importing Beer from Germany then they could say that only so many thousand galleons of the Beer is allowed to enter the UK in one year. ...read more.

Conclusion

But seeing as this would happen if we were in the EU anyway there is really not much point. But recently many important figures around Europe including Tony Blair are discussing a new currency for most of Europe, the Euro. This is a disadvantage to everyone because it means for one thing that if there is a crash or recession then there is the possibility of everyone else falling into the same trap. But is does have the practical advantage of no exchange rates and easier finance. My opinion is that Britain should not leave the EU because they gain much more if they stay in it. If each country specialises in different industries then trades freely with one another they will all be more efficient. This is why France makes good wine Belgium chocolate, UK cars and so on. This is why it is important to stay in the EU, because we are relying on others and others are relying on us. Britain will gain nothing from leaving the EU except possibly escaping from the Euro which many people are against. AS Economics Ed Mathews Miss Simmonds 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    A firm must put their plans forward to unsure that they are not breaching any rules. This can have an impact on firm such as Boots if the government is helping a firm that firm will have an advantage over the others.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    Firm must make sure it does not cause a dispute with its strategy or major loses could be suffered. International organisation, this is very important because of its commercial infrastructure, which can change from the way business is conducted to the state of the road and general transport systems.

  1. The Foreign Policy of Great Britain in relationship to the European Union.

    Ever since it joined the European Union Britain's share of the vote has declined with every further increase through enlargement. Nice's decision means a big jump in its relative share of the vote and it will mean that when enlargement is completed and all 27 countries have entered the European

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    introduce something new or something peculiar to citizenship, when it transpires that part of their attractiveness is the fact that they are considered universal. One cannot escape the feeling that the drafters were desperately looking for some relatively easy, and non-consequential "ballast" for the ill defined and ill thought citizenship Chapter.

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    and Decision of the European Parliament of 13 December 2001. (5) OJ L 43, 14.2.1997, p. 25 (9) In order to allow a customer to assess the cost of a cross-border payment, it is necessary that he be informed of the charges applied and any modification to them.

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    For U.S., the division of labor was not clear enough. For example the idea of handing over an operation to NATO that was started by Rapid Reaction Force of EU, if the circumstances of the operation necessitate such an action, was a question mark.

  1. The Euro.

    The European Central Bank will approve the volume of euro coins issued by EMU countries. The Ministry of Finance in each EMU country will have responsibility for the minting of that country's euro coins although, in some countries, another body such as the national central bank will mint the coins.

  2. To what extent was the fall of Olivares due to the Union of Arms?The ...

    autonomy"7, reduce tariff and political barriers, and produce some uniformity particularly in the Iberian Peninsula itself through involving set quotas of troops from each province and territory. Olivares was aware that the fragmentary nature of Spain was central to the domestic problems it faced and as a "natural activist" and passionate reformer, simply could not ignore it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work