• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain leave the European Union?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Britain leave the European Union? In 1973 Britain joined the EU meaning that they are protected from imports from abroad. For example if a firm in America wanted to import a product into the UK then they would have to pay a sum of money or a tariff. In the EU there is a rule that means that all members can trade freely with one another inside Europe without having to pay tax or any money for the import or export of their goods. But before 1973 Britain's industries were very poor and there was no reason why the government should do anything about it. Competition was low and this is why they did not. Britain originally joined the EU for economic reasons mainly to gain the advantage of having a free trade area. As soon as Britain did join they faced a big threat. The quality and output of goods in Britain was poor even though they provided for the rest of Europe, this meant that the firms making could fall behind and run out of business if they did not improve. ...read more.

Middle

It is thought to many people that these workers who come into the UK are asylum seekers and cost many ordinary British citizens their jobs. This is not true as these workers are highly skilled and do not seek asylum in Britain. This can be proved by the growing number of foreign workers who become say brain surgeons and professors. These people do not cost jobs because they cause industry to be pushed to keep up with the amount of people working in Britain. If it was true that foreigners cost jobs it would mean that every time a baby is born a job is lost and this is ridiculous. In fact without these free movement of labour industries would not grow. When Britain joined the EU in 1973 although countries belonging to it were not allowed to introduce tariffs to goods they subsidised or used a quota. A quota is a limit on the amount of imports per year. If Britain was importing Beer from Germany then they could say that only so many thousand galleons of the Beer is allowed to enter the UK in one year. ...read more.

Conclusion

But seeing as this would happen if we were in the EU anyway there is really not much point. But recently many important figures around Europe including Tony Blair are discussing a new currency for most of Europe, the Euro. This is a disadvantage to everyone because it means for one thing that if there is a crash or recession then there is the possibility of everyone else falling into the same trap. But is does have the practical advantage of no exchange rates and easier finance. My opinion is that Britain should not leave the EU because they gain much more if they stay in it. If each country specialises in different industries then trades freely with one another they will all be more efficient. This is why France makes good wine Belgium chocolate, UK cars and so on. This is why it is important to stay in the EU, because we are relying on others and others are relying on us. Britain will gain nothing from leaving the EU except possibly escaping from the Euro which many people are against. AS Economics Ed Mathews Miss Simmonds 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    A firm must put their plans forward to unsure that they are not breaching any rules. This can have an impact on firm such as Boots if the government is helping a firm that firm will have an advantage over the others.

  2. To what extent was the fall of Olivares due to the Union of Arms?The ...

    The loss was grave; Portugal had a valuable Navy that was essential to mobilisation of Spanish troops. Furthermore, Olivares refused to resign himself to the loss and drained Spain's financial resources further by spending around three million ducats annually trying to reclaim the territory.

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    After this shift, we see concentrated U.S. efforts in order to "set common ground" in terms of defense and security. Washington summit is crucial regarding these efforts. U.S. dedicates itself for a better relationship with ESDI (later ESDP). This new bargain in Washington was reaffirming NATO's primacy by stressing the notion of separable but not separate forces, where NATO as a whole is not engaged.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    a minority will/should accept the legitimacy of a majority decision because both majority and minority are part of the same demos, belong to the nation. That is an integral part of what rule-by-the-people, democracy, means on this reading. Thus, nationality constitutes the state (hence nation-state)

  1. International Economics

    This exchange of power from our government to the European Central Government could be seen as another disadvantage to joining the Euro. Some skeptics believe that upon losing the pound there will be a significant loss of national identity. To an extent this could be very true, having a foreign

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Next to these somewhat older and small-scale systems, the European Banking Association (EBA) has set up STEP1 (November 2000) and - more recently - STEP2 (April 2003). Both systems use EURO1, a system of the EBA for large-value payments, for settling. In figure 2, the working of EURO1 is illustrated.

  1. HND European Business

    in 2000 (adjusting for purchasing power parity estimates) was Euro 22603 - GDP per head for EU(25) in 2000 was Euro 19661 - The 10 accession countries in 2000 had a GDP per head (PPP adjusted) of just 48.2% of the average of the newly enlarged 25 nations of the EU ii)

  2. An examination of British policy with regard to European Unity during the period 1945 ...

    The essay will refer to Labour's socialist principles and commitments, the relationship with the Commonwealth, and the argument that Britain still viewed its self as on of the `Big Three' pillars of global power. These facets will be cited as the prime reasons for British policy during these years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work