• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the UK constitution remain un-codified?

Extracts from this document...


Should the UK constitution remain uncodified ? The UK has an un-codified constitution, or in other words, it is not found in one single written document, like in the USA. In fact, ours derives from a number of sources, some written, and others universally accepted such as the ever growing amount of practical case laws. Other sources include EU law, statute law, and books written by key individuals, such as Bagehot's "The British Constitution", which clearly outlines the roles of the cabinet, parliament and monarch. This unique nature has given rise to many benefits and advantages implying that its nature should not be altered or fully "codified" as with most other countries. However, as with most political theories, there is a strong opposing argument to it, and thus within this essay both sides will be explored and a final judgement made. One of the strongest features of an uncodified constitution is its adaptability and ease of amendment, allowing it to remain relevant in modern times, making redundant laws inapplicable and creating new ones to keep up with our ever evolving political, social and economical climate. ...read more.


Another significant factor is the general public acceptance of our uncodified constitution. Although some may argue that not everyone knows their specific rights and civil liberties due to the complexity of the constitution, people still seem to be fairly happy, and so there is very little demand for major reform in the rights area of the argument. The conservative argument "if it aint broke don't fix it" is often cited, in simple terms, it works and functions so there is no need to destroy a working model. However, some argue that there are significant flaws to our so called truly democratic constitution. One of these, despite perhaps not being as serious as may appear, as explained above, is the lack of an equivalent to the US Bill of rights, and so the fine details of our constitutional rights are somewhat unclear. Perhaps the way forward would be to create such a document, but implement it into our current system, along side the many other documents and sources that create the constitution, a sort of "best of both worlds" scenario. ...read more.


A codified constitution also has educational value. A codified constitution highlights the central values and overall goals of a political system. This would likely strengthen citizenship as it creates a clearer sense of political identity which may be particularly important in an increasingly multicultural society. In conclusion, although there are legitimate arguments for, and against both types of constitution, it in practice looks like an un-written, un-codified constitution is how it should, and will stay in the UK. This is because the current system we have works perfectly fine, and although it may have its issues, such as the possibility of a government taking advantage of its powers to create new laws, they are countered with the significant advantages over a written, unchangeable one. Perhaps more importantly, there is actually little demand for change, from both the Government and the public, and there would be a significant financial and time cost for such a change, which many argue would bring about little improvement and in reality even more problems in the future when it would be labelled outdated and unrepresentative. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the arguments for and against introducing a codified constitution

    3 star(s)

    second chamber in addition to the decade since the ejection of hereditary peers. The easiest way to find out whether the people wanted a codified constitution would be to hold a referendum, though it is unlikely to motivate large numbers of the electorate.

  2. Should the UK have a codified constitution?

    Although recently parliament has passed the Human Rights Act 1998 which came into force on 2nd October 2000, parliament can theoretically out rule this Act and pass another law to abolish the Human Rights Act. Parliament can take away our rights at anytime, brining into question whether they should have so much power.

  1. Make out a case against the adoption of a codified constitution for the UK

    covered by it, this issue was shown when the Afghani terrorist in 2000 that use the Human Rights Act in their defence for staying in Britain. Another argument against changing the UK constitution to codify is that it would put too much power in the hand of the Judiciary which

  2. Should the UK constitution remain uncodified?

    Another argument for a codified constitution is limited government. A codified constitution would cut government down to size. In other words it would end the principle of parliamentary sovereignty and subsequently elective dictatorship.

  1. Assess whether or not the United Kingdom should adopt a codified constitution?

    This means that it is very hard to amend or abolish any laws. The constitution is entrenched. It is easier and quicker to introduce a new act of parliament than to amend the constitution. Due to the rigid, inflexible nature of a codified constitution, it is hard for the constitution to remain relevant and up to date.

  2. The Benefits of an Uncodified UK Constitution

    Although the constitution is not written down in one single document, works of authority allow for an insight into certain parts of the constitution dating back to the Magna Carta 1215.

  1. Should the Constitution of the UK remain uncodified?

    This is because the judiciary branch of the government would be open to interpret the constitution however they wanted, which means that we would be giving an rather large amount of power to an unelected body. This would weaken the democratic system of the UK, as judges are unrepresentative, and

  2. Should the UK have a codified constitution?

    A codified constitution would be much better in cases where the constitution needs to be referenced, for example when making laws it would be much simpler to know what you were basing your judgement on. However, I think that the uncodified constitution and its flexibility does benefit the changes we

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work