By Freddie Overton 08/11/2007
“Should the UK have a monarchy?”
The United Kingdom probably has the most monarchy in the world which draws millions of extra pounds from tourism every year yet drains it by over £50 million. The position of monarchy has existed ever since before the roman times, but does this mean it should not be abolished despite its spiralling costs and seemingly useless democratic role.
Perhaps the first point that should be made is that in a democracy; where everyone is meant to be given equal chance, why should the head of state be elected by birth right not by working towards a goal or being very talented and not being judged on his background. In a democratic society, why should one person who has not been fairly elected have the power to overturn laws and influence the outcome of elections? However, no British monarchy has vetoed an act of parliament since around 1720 and perhaps the fact that the monarchy can advise and warn the prime minister in times of difficulty means that although they have not been elected, they can give a wise and fair view of the situation without being constricted by the will of the people who voted to put them into power