• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the UK have a written constitution?

Extracts from this document...


03/05/07 Tim Gloster Should the UK have a written constitution? This question has been asked many times in the past few decades to many different governments. During the 18 years of Conservative rule up to 1997 changing the un-written constitution to a written one was hardly discussed, the Conservatives are not in favour of it at all. Conservative Prime Ministers like Margaret Thatcher took the view, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." However since 1997, when Labour came to power, there have been several constitutional changes, such as devolution, and there are calls to have a written constitution from many in the Labour government. ...read more.


All citizens of the UK would know their rights, they would be in a simple, easy to understand and codified format, just like in the US, instead of a part-written constitution which can be very hard to interpret. It would end the odd system where the underlying theories, such as the separation of powers, do not match up with the current practice. However there are also arguments against changing our part-written for a written one. The first, and one of the most important arguments, is that the present system actually works well, as I quoted earlier, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The present system is very flexible and it easy to make and repeal law, in contrast to the US where it is extremely difficult to get laws passed. ...read more.


The bill was written quickly and quickly signed by the Queen and turned into an act, all in the space of a week or so. In contrast other countries have a great deal of problems in changing their written constitution when need be. Overall I think the UK should stick with what we have at the moment, a part-written constitution. It offers a great deal of flexibility, it works and there would be very little agreement on how a new system would work and what would replace all the institutions that bear a royal title and who's rules and history revolve around the monarchy if it were abolished. Our current system also makes us unique in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    Because the Prime Minister is such a leading figure in the executive it is suggested that Tony Blair can tell the executive what to do and in effect is ruling the country in a dictatorial fashion. But this situation can only occur due to the huge majority involved.

  2. Discuss the arguments for and against a codified constitution

    As a result, for example, a number of asylum seeks have been detained without trial. Under a codified constitution they would be unable to introduce this legislation to restrict people's rights and the only way to do this is to amend the constitution which would be difficult and a lengthy process.

  1. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    Britain does, however, have certain important constitutional documents, including the: > Magna Carta (1215) which protects the rights of the community against the Crown; the > Bill of Rights (1689) Our unwritten constitution is old fashioned, and there is not even an agreement about what it actually contains as it

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    German ministers for his refusal to surrender Britain's veto on tax and social affairs (Waugh and Castle, 2000). The European effect upon the constitution is a serious one to be considered, especially when issues such as tax and social affairs are choosing to be addressed by the EU.

  1. How well does the US Constitution Work

    The Constitution pays careful attention in defining where certain powers lie. In particular it does a clever job of dividing certain powers between the state and federal government. Also there are specific division or separation of powers between the three branches of the government.

  2. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    This allows for a much more dynamic constitution to evolve and adapt to the changing circumstances of the United Kingdom for example, the development of the party system, the decline in monarch power and the increased power of the cabinet.

  1. The British Constitution

    Once appointed by the Queen, he will he appoint his cabinet, which is the core of British Government. As there is no written British Constitution, many powers of the monarch have passed to the Prime Minister. We now have a Prime Ministerial Style of government.

  2. Assess the impact of the Gulf War, September 11th and the was in Iraq ...

    There was no justification for their involvement. Having previously defeat the Soviet Union there was no oppostion to America and they were seen as the only 'Super Power'. With the concept of Seperation of Power being upheld in America, Internationally, this was not the case as there was no form

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work