• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the UK have a written constitution?

Extracts from this document...


03/05/07 Tim Gloster Should the UK have a written constitution? This question has been asked many times in the past few decades to many different governments. During the 18 years of Conservative rule up to 1997 changing the un-written constitution to a written one was hardly discussed, the Conservatives are not in favour of it at all. Conservative Prime Ministers like Margaret Thatcher took the view, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." However since 1997, when Labour came to power, there have been several constitutional changes, such as devolution, and there are calls to have a written constitution from many in the Labour government. ...read more.


All citizens of the UK would know their rights, they would be in a simple, easy to understand and codified format, just like in the US, instead of a part-written constitution which can be very hard to interpret. It would end the odd system where the underlying theories, such as the separation of powers, do not match up with the current practice. However there are also arguments against changing our part-written for a written one. The first, and one of the most important arguments, is that the present system actually works well, as I quoted earlier, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The present system is very flexible and it easy to make and repeal law, in contrast to the US where it is extremely difficult to get laws passed. ...read more.


The bill was written quickly and quickly signed by the Queen and turned into an act, all in the space of a week or so. In contrast other countries have a great deal of problems in changing their written constitution when need be. Overall I think the UK should stick with what we have at the moment, a part-written constitution. It offers a great deal of flexibility, it works and there would be very little agreement on how a new system would work and what would replace all the institutions that bear a royal title and who's rules and history revolve around the monarchy if it were abolished. Our current system also makes us unique in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    This would not be seen as a step forward democratically for the UK. The arguments for a written constitution are that the government is too powerful. For example the Blair government has such a huge majority the executive is in effect ruling the country and not parliament.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    With respect to Article 1 in relation to checks and Balances, all actions of the President would be subjected to scrutiny by congress and the senate. Furthermore Congress would be subjected to regular review, with clear terms of office and particulars defined.

  1. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    Britain does, however, have certain important constitutional documents, including the: > Magna Carta (1215) which protects the rights of the community against the Crown; the > Bill of Rights (1689) Our unwritten constitution is old fashioned, and there is not even an agreement about what it actually contains as it

  2. Discuss the arguments for and against a codified constitution

    For example, since the attack on the twin towers in the USA on 11 September 2001, the government has been able to persuade parliament to pass an anti-terrorist legislation which goes against certain rights despite the UK having a Human Rights Act (1998).

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    The sheer flexibility of the UK constitution has also allowed for the development of the European Union and for EU legislation to be incorporated into the UK constitution, which has dramatically altered the UK political system moving ever closer to being a federal state in the European realm.

  2. Federalism vs. Devolution

    There are several negative consequences with federalism, beginning with the massive variation there can be in state laws, over key issues such as crime and punishment, drinking ages and marriage laws. Secondly, it creates a complex legal system, with both national and state courts each with their own agenda.

  1. "A written constitution, rather than gradual reform, is now essential for the UK to ...

    The key issues that are arguments against the written constitution are the it is unnecessary because gradual reform still works well, it is undesirable because power would be transferred to an unelected body of judges and that it would be unachievable due to the fact that there would be disagreement

  2. Assess the impact of the Gulf War, September 11th and the was in Iraq ...

    of checks and balances, there was no one to question America so they done what they percieved to be correct. They were imposing their own from of government on foreign land, this goes against the Constitution and the 6 defining principles which make up the Constitution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work