• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the UK reform the Electoral System used for General Elections

Extracts from this document...


The first alternative type of system is the majority system with two of the most common types of majority system being the Alternative Vote system, the Supplementary Vote system. These systems are very similar with voters ranking candidates in order of preference and the candidate who wins 50% or more wins the election. If no one does gain this 50% the lowest ranked candidate is eliminated and the second preference votes are redistributed till 50% is gained by a candidate. The difference in the Supplementary Vote system is that voters are only allowed to select two preferences. The disadvantage of these systems is that it leads to disproportional support for the centre party, because more often than not if they are not a voter's first choice they would be their second choice. The second type of system is the proportional system, which includes two main types of this system, the List system and the Single transferable Vote system. The List system has varying forms within it, such as the Closed and the Open List system. In the Closed List parties submit a list of candidates for each constituency and then voters vote for parties on their ballot paper. Seats are allocated to parties on the proportion of the vote they win and candidates are given seats by working down the list. In the Open List system candidates are indicated on the ballot paper and then the party vote is determined by how much of the vote their candidates receive. ...read more.


These disadvantages of other voting systems contribute to the debate over reforming the UK general election system and they demonstrate that alternative systems to the plurality system have considerable flaws, which would hinder a political system if it were introduced. Recent progressions in the step to electoral reform also seem to favour the case against reforming the system. In 1990 the Labour Party set up the Plant Commission to investigate possible systems of reform and recommendations were announced with many of these proposals later being introduced. This was however focusing on regional or European elections and it was only later in the Jenkins Report that the issue of reform the electoral system for general elections was addressed. This report suggested introducing preference voting and ranking the candidates with the redistribution of second preference votes after the elimination of the lowest ranked candidate if the 50% margin was not reached. This would only be used for 80-85% of the seats and the remaining 15-20% of the seats would be top-up MPs based on the overall vote each party gets so that parties were not under represented. These recommendations have never been extended beyond the report and there has been an obvious slow in the rush for electoral reform. This is partly down to the cooling of Labour's support for the reforms to be introduced. They initially were enthusiastic about the Jenkins Report but recent experience, such as new systems in Scotland and Wales failing to give Labour any sort of advantage and often hindering them, have altered there view. ...read more.


This demonstrates how the idea of electoral reform, of any sort, has lost its appealing factor and the resigned nature of Mandelson's comments suggest that reform will be left alone for the time being, which favours the anti-reformists case. The case against reforming the electoral system for general elections is strong and it has been demonstrated through the advantages of the current plurality system, as well as the disadvantages of any other possible alternative systems that there is no need for reform and any possible reform introduced would not necessarily improve the political system. Recent experiences also suggest that electoral reform would either not be successful or would not gain the support needed to implement it because the public are not interested in the issue. Despite those favouring reform producing arguments which claim that the plurality system wastes votes, it is the minority's choice and that it could create an electoral dictatorship, the success of the First Passed The Post system is evident and as George Foulkes highlights in his comment, 'Our present voting system at least ensures that government decisions are made by the party which has the most votes, admittedly the largest minority', it is the best choice to produce a strong and reliable government and choices have to be made in politics because you can never find a fully democratic system. ?? ?? ?? ?? Timothy Linehan Politics Essay On Electoral Reform. - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Electoral Systems Assignment

    demanded that there needed to be a wider variety of choice within their electoral system. STV was able to satisfy each of these three aims. Of course, to use this voting system in Westminster elections may not work so well; the majority of the public may find it much too complicated to understand and therefore abstain from voting at all.

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the British Electoral System as used inThe General ...

    For example, in 2001 Labour got 9% more votes than the conservatives, yet they gained 247 more seats in parliament than the Tories. Is this fair? Is it fair that with only 40.7% of the votes Labour managed to gain 63% of the seats in the commons?

  1. How, and with what success, have governments attempted to improve the provision of health ...

    The Government in 1997 aimed to maintain this principle and improve it further by setting up The National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness (NICE) to end all inequalities within the availability of drugs. NICE decides which drugs are available in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    a good thing, as many politicians have found out to their peril, when the media latched on to a negative aspect of a certain politicians life. Whether it's their private life, or their professional life, every politician is under constant scrutiny by the media, and has to be extremely careful

  1. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    might think that their vote won't make any difference and not bother voting at all. Oppositely, they could try and use their vote to prevent their least favourite of the most popular parties from getting into power by voting for their nearest competitor.

  2. Different Types of Electoral System and the UK.

    Then the second choices on the ballot paper of the eliminated candidates are checked and then the second choice votes are distributed (if applicable) between the two remaining candidates. The candidate with the most votes at the end all this process wins the election.

  1. Should Britain reform its electoral system for general elections?

    Furthermore, FPTP aids democracy because it clarifies the choices available to voters and can be used by anyone; all you have to do is cross through one box. It offers voters a clear and simple choice between potential parties of government, each committed to a different policy or ideological agenda

  2. The case Against Electoral Reform

    with as little as 26% of the vote. PROJECTED OUTCOMES OF 1997 ELECTION WITH BETWEEN USING AV TOP-UP WITH 15% AND 20% TOP-UP MEMBERS Table 1: 20% or 132 Top-Up Members in 1997 CON LAB LIB DEM SNP/PC NI Parties DV Score OTHER FPTP 165 419 46 10 18 1

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work