• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the Westminster Electoral System be Reformed?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Should the Westminster Electoral System be Reformed? The First Past the Post system is used in the UK to elect representatives for constituencies into the Westminster Parliament. The system is a plurality system; candidates need a simple majority to win a seat, which is considered disproportionate by some. However is it is apparent that the system should not be reformed. One argument in favor of the reformation of the system is evoked from the disproportionality of the system, in terms of distribution of seat compared to votes won. In the 2010 General Election the winning party, the Conservatives, won 36% of the votes but were awarded 47% of the seats, whereas the Liberal Democrats won 23% of the votes but were awarded only 9% of the seats. This clearly illustrates the disproportional distribution of seats in the system. In a study by the Electoral Reform Society they illustrated that with the Single Transferable Vote system the results of the election would be far more proportional. ...read more.


Tactical voting is a term used to describe a vote cast in favour of a party, which is not the voters first preference, because the electorate does not wish for the most likely party to win to represent them, so the electorate will vote for the party they think has the best chance in beating the leading party. Lastly is the argument that under the current system of the Westminster parliament, governments may be established without an absolute majority of the votes but because they have an absolute majority of seats they effectively have a mandate to rule. An example of this is in 2005, Labour won the election with an absolute majority of seats but only 35% of the votes cast. This shows that the majority of voters in the UK did not want Labour to win. Although there are arguments in favour of reforming the current Westminster electoral system, consisting of disproportionality, choice for voters and legitimacy. ...read more.


An exception to this is the Conservative Liberal Democrat coalition formed as a result of no party achieving an absolute majority in the 2010 general election. Even though this contradicts the argument of FPTP forming a decisive government, it is still argued that they hold a legitimate mandate to rule with a decisive 59% of seats in the House of Commons. Lastly, the current electoral system maintains a strong constituency link between voters and their MP?s. This is important as it means MP?s are more able to understand the issues of the people in their constituency and, if appropriate, help them. This constituency link is a result of small constituencies with only a single MP for each. The constituency link is not as prominent in other electoral systems such as the Party list, which have multi member constituencies. In conclusion the FPTP system, currently used as the Westminster electoral system, is the most appropriate in terms of simplicity, government stability, government legitimacy and a strong constituency link. Therefor the Westminster electoral system should not be reformed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Should the Westminster Electoral System be Reformed?

    changing the electoral system was defeated by a large margin meaning that the majority of the UK is happy with our electoral system and no government will dare to overturn the decision by implementing a form of AV or another electoral system.

  2. Democracy and Voting

    What are the weaknesses of FPTP? * Over-representation of the winning party e.g. Labour only won 40% of votes, but have 60% seats. * Under-representation of other parties e.g. Lib Dems b/c of regional bias. * Wasted votes are an issue because if you do not vote for the winning candidate your vote does not count for anything e.g.

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    Below are tables of results for each question, I will then create some graphs based on the results of some of the questions. Tables of results: Question 1: What is your age? Age Range: Amount of People: 15-24 6 25-34 8 35-44 12 45+ 14 Question 2: What is your gender?

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    his opponents, the rest of the votes are then wasted as well. In 2001, according to the Electoral Reform Society, an astonishing 70.3% of the popular vote was wasted in one of these two ways. Furthermore, many of the seats are considered 'safe' by certain parties and do not normally

  1. Electoral Systems.

    In 1997 47.1% of British MPs were elected by less then 50% of the votes in their constituencies. In 1992, 40.1% of MPs were not supported by as many as 50% of their constituents. * It removes the need for negative voting.

  2. How far does the Westminster electoral system ensure a strong and stable government? [25 ...

    Another way the system can be seen to create strong governments is the precedent of landslide victories, winning parties often get a large percentage of the seats available; for example, in the 1997 election, Labour won 63.4% of the seats?making Tony Blair the first Labour Prime Minister since 1979.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work