• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the Westminster Electoral System be Reformed?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Should the Westminster Electoral System be Reformed? The First Past the Post system is used in the UK to elect representatives for constituencies into the Westminster Parliament. The system is a plurality system; candidates need a simple majority to win a seat, which is considered disproportionate by some. However is it is apparent that the system should not be reformed. One argument in favor of the reformation of the system is evoked from the disproportionality of the system, in terms of distribution of seat compared to votes won. In the 2010 General Election the winning party, the Conservatives, won 36% of the votes but were awarded 47% of the seats, whereas the Liberal Democrats won 23% of the votes but were awarded only 9% of the seats. This clearly illustrates the disproportional distribution of seats in the system. In a study by the Electoral Reform Society they illustrated that with the Single Transferable Vote system the results of the election would be far more proportional. ...read more.


Tactical voting is a term used to describe a vote cast in favour of a party, which is not the voters first preference, because the electorate does not wish for the most likely party to win to represent them, so the electorate will vote for the party they think has the best chance in beating the leading party. Lastly is the argument that under the current system of the Westminster parliament, governments may be established without an absolute majority of the votes but because they have an absolute majority of seats they effectively have a mandate to rule. An example of this is in 2005, Labour won the election with an absolute majority of seats but only 35% of the votes cast. This shows that the majority of voters in the UK did not want Labour to win. Although there are arguments in favour of reforming the current Westminster electoral system, consisting of disproportionality, choice for voters and legitimacy. ...read more.


An exception to this is the Conservative Liberal Democrat coalition formed as a result of no party achieving an absolute majority in the 2010 general election. Even though this contradicts the argument of FPTP forming a decisive government, it is still argued that they hold a legitimate mandate to rule with a decisive 59% of seats in the House of Commons. Lastly, the current electoral system maintains a strong constituency link between voters and their MP?s. This is important as it means MP?s are more able to understand the issues of the people in their constituency and, if appropriate, help them. This constituency link is a result of small constituencies with only a single MP for each. The constituency link is not as prominent in other electoral systems such as the Party list, which have multi member constituencies. In conclusion the FPTP system, currently used as the Westminster electoral system, is the most appropriate in terms of simplicity, government stability, government legitimacy and a strong constituency link. Therefor the Westminster electoral system should not be reformed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    1 Other 1 DO NOT WISH TO SHARE THIS INFORMATION 10 Question 5: Why don't you have any interest in Government and Politics? Why No interest: Amount of People: Don't understand the basics 1 Find it boring 0 Don't think your vote will matter 3 Don't know 2 Other reason

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    his opponents, the rest of the votes are then wasted as well. In 2001, according to the Electoral Reform Society, an astonishing 70.3% of the popular vote was wasted in one of these two ways. Furthermore, many of the seats are considered 'safe' by certain parties and do not normally

  1. Electoral Systems.

    * Extreme parties would be unlikely to gain support by AV and coalition governments would be no more likely to arise than they are under First-Past-The-Post. * All MPs would have the support of a majority of their constituents. * It prevents MPs being elected on a minority of the vote.

  2. Should the Westminster Electoral System be Reformed?

    changing the electoral system was defeated by a large margin meaning that the majority of the UK is happy with our electoral system and no government will dare to overturn the decision by implementing a form of AV or another electoral system.

  1. Democracy and Voting

    * Tactical voting - voting for the least objectionable candidate, or intentionally voting against a particular candidate. How does the AV system work? * The country is divided usually into single member constituencies. * Voters would rank their candidates in order of preference (1 being their favourite etc)

  2. The case Against Electoral Reform

    members hence creating animosity between them and causing the government to be unstable. And AMS does not maintain the bond between MP and her/her constituencies as previously stated as this bond is superficial and fragile and with the example of a rival and equally active MP of an opposing party on the scene, this link eventually weakened if not broken.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work