Should the Westminster Electoral System be Reformed?

This essay hasn't yet been marked by one of our teachers

You can view 1 essay on United Kingdom that have been Marked by Teachers

The first 200 words of this essay...

Should the Westminster electoral system be reformed?

The Westminster electoral system has been a target for reform for a long time. Despite the loss in the 2011 referendum, reform is still wanted by a number of people especially the Liberal Democrats who will benefit the most. First Past the Post is the system that Westminster uses for election to the Houses of Commons; it is a simple majority or plurality system that requires a candidate to get more votes than anyone else.

One argument that the Westminster electoral system should be reformed is that First Past the Post doesn't give the social representation that other system gives, for example in the Parliament elected in 2010, women, 51% of the population, are represented by 22% of Parliament therefore an under representation, however, university educated are overrepresented, 91% of the Houses of Commons represent 31% of the population but having PR doesn't guarantee that the social composition of Parliament only making the percentage of votes more proportional towards the seats. Moreover, FPTP stops extremist parties such as the BNP from gaining election and having influence over policy or gaining any credibility.

One argument for reform