• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Religious fundamentalism is the belief that social and political life should be organized on the basis of what are seen as essential religious principles that are supported by a belief in the literal truth of scared texts.1 Fascism, on the other hand is a totalitarian ideology that centers itself upon the leader and possesses the 'anti-factor' whereby it rejects a whole lot of other ideologies such as liberalism and communism. At first glance, there seems to be not much connection between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism; however a more detailed comparison between the two ideologies will reveal similarities that caused the former to be viewed by some as the "new fascism" and differences that made this view irrelevant. In the first half of this paper, I am going to compare and contrast the various similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism and then show that to deem religious fundamentalism as a new form of fascism is really unjustified. In the remaining half of the paper, I will make an argument for my belief that 21st century religious fundamentalism should indeed be considered as an ideology and also the basis of its mass appeal. Due to the complexities and varieties of 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century fascism, the similarities and differences listed below can be seen as generalizations and thus proven wrong by certain sects of religious fundamentalism or certain style of fascism. ...read more.

Middle

Many religious fundamentalists believe that political power should be subordinated to religious power whereby the Bishop, the Rabbi, or the Ayatollah should be able to make the final decision on social issues.10 The best case scenario for religious fundamentalists would be as in the case of Iran where they actually govern however, compromises are made between religious fundamentalists and secular authorities.11 This belief that political power should be subordinate to religious power is of course the direct opposite of fascism whereby churches (religion) should be subordinate to the state. 21st century religious fundamentalism also possess other aspects in their ideology that is absent in 20th century European Fascism. Some of these attributes are otherworldliness and messianic spirit (where fundamentalists are concerned with the sacred and devote energy only in activities consonant with the words of God), against science (rejecting critical interpretations of the Bible and Darwin's evolutionary theory), belief in the supernatural, moralism and the subordination of women.12 After showing the differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism, I will like to conclude that to brand the former as "new fascism" is not only unfair but incorrect. Next, this paper shall argue for 21st century religious fundamentalism to be accorded its rightful status as an ideology. Before I start defending my belief that religious fundamentalism is an ideology, I will like to provide the definitions of political theory and political philosophy. This is because of the commonly interchangeable usage of ideology, theory and philosophy and thus a clear distinction between the three terms will be helpful to my argument. ...read more.

Conclusion

The basis of 21st century religious fundamentalism's mass appeal must be its political vision of the world and the kind of a new society that it can bring to the world. Faced with social problems such as rising crime rates, teenage pregnancy and abortion rates in the Western countries, evangelical activists draw strength from its ideology and attempt to fight all these social problems through the formation of pressure groups pressuring and cajoling the government to make improvements in all realms of lives, from abolishing abortion to anti-pornography laws to religious education in school. These actions by evangelical activists from their perspective can be seen not only as morally rewarding but also efforts made that adhere to their religious beliefs. Political Islam's appeal in the Middle East can also be attributed to the erosion of traditional values brought about by modernization.22 Furthermore, complicated by the colonial experience, the failure of secular nationalism, the Israel creation and unhealthy US interferences in the region, political Islam remains a very attractive alternative to western ideas.( the reason been that Islam cover all aspects of lives and offer solutions to just about everything) In conclusion, this paper has shown the similarities and the differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism and also argued that to call religious fundamentalism "new fascism" is not only incorrect but unjustified. This paper has also argued for 21st century religious fundamentalism to be considered as an ideology through the demonstration of it fulfilling the various criteria of an ideology. Lastly, this paper has provided the writer's perception for the basis of 21st century religious fundamentalism mass appeal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    in the form of benefits people ion the basis of race, colour, gender or religion. They therefore have both legal and political equality resulting in equality before the law; "one person, one vote; one vote, one values." Liberals claim that people should have 'equality of opportunity' as thus have the same chance to rise or fall in society.

  2. Main features of fascism

    destroy opposition and not letting them interfere with the rule of the government and this is a clear characteristic of dictatorship. One of the main features of fascism is the racial intolerance, for example the Nazi in Germany believed in the ideology of supremacy of the race "racial purity" so

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    encompasses the widest range of institutions and organizations in the public/political sphere: from constitutional conventions, executive offices, legislatures, regulatory agencies, judicial bodies, and bureaucracies to political parties, interest groups, and other organizations that make up the polity in civil society.

  2. Is Fascism an Ideology?

    set of ideas, which Heywood offers as a necessary criteria, it is more a relentless set of grievances. Fascism, unlike any other Ideology, has an affinity for conflict and war. It is for them a method of proving their superiority but also in reality represents their only true goal, other

  1. Political Ideologies

    * Big government (social and economic intervention) are seen as necessary to avoid people being abused by those in charge * Freedom = the ability to flourish and achieve self-realization not the freedom to be left alone as this ma lead to being harmed * State intervention will therefore safeguard

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    actors are in a constant state of competition characterised by distrust, suspicion, jealousy, conflict and war (Viotti & Kauppi 1993:41). The implications of Hobbes' writings for international relations is that without a social contract among states to create an authority over states, there are no obligations to govern the relations between states.

  1. Could one censor pornography, on Millean grounds?

    Development is individual to each person and the one who has the greatest character, according to Mill, is the one whose impulses and desires are strongest and whose nature is "energetic"7. Restrictions should not be placed on people simply due to others having feelings of disgust, resentment or jealously but

  2. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    Also we learn that a revolutionary force would be faced with a counter-revolutionary one and inevitably anarchists would find themselves in situations of power such as in Catalonia. If the anarchists had won, they could never have made it possible for a state like Spain to grow economically at that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work