• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SO, WHAT'S WRONG WITH ANARCHISM? Anarchy: chaos, confusion, disorder, lawlessness, rebellion, riot1. This is how the dictionary explains anarchism and without a doubt this is how most people understand it to be. However they forget that the ideology itself stands for peace, equality and the idea of a stateless society. In this essay I will seek to explain the theory of anarchy, as well as answering the question by distinguishing between its positive aspects and its negative ones. I will also try to elucidate if anarchism can work and also give examples of it in practise as well as explain what is wrong with it as I go along. The basic commitment in anarchy is freedom. It teaches that society can and should be organised without the coercive authority of the state and it sees it as its biggest enemy and as an oppressor of the people2. There are however four different types of anarchists who agree on a stateless society but they range from defenders of private property and free market to supporters of complete common ownership, co-operative labour and distribution according to need3. The four different schools of thought in anarchy are: individualism, mutualism, collectivism and communism. ...read more.

Middle

It would be a long process to decide for it and therefore it would probably be too annoying to go through all those unnecessary bureaucracies and the probability of the people getting what they want when they want would be slim. Also the question of crime, if people do not own anything than it would not be a crime if someone took the car without consent because it's theirs as much as everyone else's. However anarchism is not absolutely useless, there are a few points which make it a respectable ideology and could probably work in a modern society. Anarchist ideas can be seen in many of today's laws and movements. It has encouraged liberals to overcome their hypocrisies over matters such as freedom of speech9. Its ideas of human equality, freedom, no coercion and exploitation has helped the feminist movement to achieve some of their goals. Other values for which they stand for such as opposition to violence can be related to pacifism. Another reason why anarchism can be good is that everyone is treated as an equal, in contrast with the capitalist system of USA they only gave African Americans equal rights in 1963, and South Africa ended apartheid in 1993. ...read more.

Conclusion

One of the main faults with it is the fact that there are so many schools of thought and they do not agree with each other on the core issues of anarchy, such as, what kind of system would best work for people, while some argue on pure individual values others argue on some form of authority. Anarchy is based on a very na�ve view of the people where we are meant to trust everyone and work for everyone's good, this would not be at all possible as humans are naturally cynics and their greed and desire for power would always take over. It has never attracted a great number of supporters and the example of Spain shows that it would not work. Also the very idea that there should not be a government contradicts all the present forms of society where advances in technology and the high living standards owe it to the democratic governments which are the norm in most parts of the world. The dictionary and what the majority of the people think are right in my opinion because a state of anarchy would mean a state where there are no laws and from the examples that we might have seen in recent years in different parts of the world, where there is anarchy there is war, destruction, and above all, poverty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority?

    a 'thousand tyrants' would rise up.19 The anonymously written Calvinist document The Vindicae Contra Tyrannos was published to justify resistance amongst the Huguenot communities in France. It means A Defense of Liberty Against Tyrants or A Vindication Against Tyrants. Thousands of Hugenots were slaughtered in a systematic program initiated by the Catholic monarch.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    The ultimate justification of rights for Mill is his moral theory, not some fictional state of nature or imagined natural rights. 10) Objections and replies: Mill's theory on rights is very interesting, largely because it is able to answer many questions which prove embarrassing for other theories (e.g., where do

  1. 'Accidental Death Of An Anarchist' was written by Dario Fo, in 1970 - Contextualisation

    The dramatic irony comes when the audience knows that the judge to whom the police are cowering is really the maniac, which creates the humour. Through this mistaken identity, someone, who comes of a class lower than the police officials in both wealth and status is able to adopt a

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    each act of taxation, is specifically consented to. In the issue of taxation, Locke slips, without justification, from insisting on the individual's consent to taxation which is consistent to everything thus said to assuming that there exists somewhere some form of institution expression for such a consent which it does not.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    I insist that we ought to be wary of this mistrust of bourgeois sociology because the history of Marxism shows that a serious engagement with this branch of theory is necessary to revolutionary political thought. Needless to say, the situation was aggravated by Stalinist politics because the great Soviet mystification

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Additionally, they have taken their parliamentary roles seriously, forming disciplined party factions in the Duma that have helped organize the work of the Duma along party lines (McFaul 2000b, 9-12). One can draw a significantly different (and, according to the thesis of this article, more accurate)

  1. Review on Anarchism - 'A Government which governs least governs best'.

    The beliefs of the Anarchists are divided into a series of broad principles which are, Anti-Statinism, National Order, Anti Clericalism and economic freedom. Anti-Statinism is based on the anarchist case against authority. Anarchists believe authority is an offence against the principles of absolute freedom and unrestrained political inequality.

  2. Examine the history of and different types of Anarchism

    It also lost out to Communism. Anarchism has never succeeded in winning power at national level. During the Spanish Civil War, anarchists briefly controlled parts of eastern Spain, setting up workers? and peasants? collectives. As a result of this, anarchists have looked to history for inspiration ? Ancient Greece, Medieval

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work