• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Team Health Check

Extracts from this document...


This health check is designed to help teams review their effectiveness. It is in three parts : i) Use the descriptions below to score your personal assessment of the way that the team is working right now. For each lettered statement below, you need to give a rating between 0 and 5. ii) Then share your individual assessment with the other team members to come up with an overall team assessment by calculating the average score you gave to each statement. iii) The team should then reflect on the results and develop an action plan to improve your overall effectiveness in working together. ...read more.


1 = Disagree. - We have started on this, but there is a long way to go. The descriptors do not apply. 0 = Strongly Disagree.- Nothing has been done - this does not apply at all to our team. Purpose / Direction a. - The team has a clear mission/purpose, known by all team members. b. - The team has a vision and success criteria which are challenging, meaningful and exciting to the team. c. - The team understands how the work of the team fits into the larger picture. ...read more.


- Team meetings are effective. k. - The team has found and implemented better ways of working. l. - The team has an efficient process to solve problems and take decisions. m. The team has sufficient resources (people, money, time) to do its work. Communication n. Everyone feels their ideas and input are listened to by the rest of the team. o. Differences and conflicts are resolved openly and constructively. p. Members' interaction is open and honest. Relationships q. The team's different experiences, skills and gifts are accepted and used. r. There is trust and openness between team members. s. New members feel valued and quickly become productive members of the team. t. The team takes responsibility for its successes and failures, and avoids blaming other people or groups. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. C1 Analyse the factor, which contribute towards an effective team.

    * Being open to criticism and advice- criticism improves the performance business. It also improves personal development. The advantage of criticism is that if criticised on work they can improve it and act upon the comments. The disadvantage is that it may demotivate some employees.

  2. I shall use a team of my choice as a sporting example of group ...

    Democratic: The democratic leadership style is also called the participative style as it encourages employees to be a part of the decision making. The democratic manager keeps his team members informed about everything that affects their work and shares decision-making and problem solving responsibilities.

  1. Managing Work Team Conflict: Assessment and Preventative Strategies

    5. Several team members are in conflict with several other team members. 6. The entire team experiences conflict with another team. 7. The entire team is experiencing conflict with an individual outside of the team. The research literature tends to discuss two types of conflict based on either task or affect.

  2. Examples: Shadows of Leadership

    The article goes on to describe one aspect 'principle immunity' as the freedom of parliamentary debates and proceedings from question from the courts. This privilege is based on the Bill of Rights of 1689, which declares that freedom of speech, debates, or proceedings in Parliament aren't to be impeached or questioned by any court.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work