• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The American Revolution saw the birth of a nation dedicated to equality in opportunity, government by popular consent and individual rights. How true is this?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐The presence or lack thereof, of proper rights of the individual, equal opportunity and government by popular consent following the American Revolution are heavily debated amongst historians. Undoubtedly, it is clear that not all were present in the new society, but it is impossible to deny the persistent strive to establish a fair and equal republic. Jefferson believed that equality was a gift of God through nature; it was a self-evident, natural right that society could neither give nor take away. Thus, it guaranteed all men perfect equality of human privilege (life), political and religious prerogatives (liberty), and personal opportunity (pursuit of happiness).The commonly coined phrase from the Declaration of Independence that ?All men are created equal with certain unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? was hardly true of America?s new society. ...read more.


The right to vote was cast only upon male owners of property, therefore excluding more than half the white population upon the already omitted slave population; regardless of whether or not they had been granted freedom. In contrast, equal opportunity certainly prevailed in the new society. In this age each man wanted to be free to seek a better life, he wanted to have an equal chance to rise on the ladder of well-being and denying the right to vote surely in no way hindered this. The conception of meritocracy and subsequent obliteration of deference at this time was far radical but did a world of good for the provision of equality in opportunities. A growth in colleges and public education, and the boom in nationalistic art highlight the expanding range of educated and their increasing abilities to contribute in society. ...read more.


These opposing views, along with economic difficulties made it hard to create a fair government, but the Founders nonetheless established written constitutions, founded on ?the consent of the governed?, and containing various institutional checks on the power of government designed to prevent it from being abused. Eventually, Americans as a whole seemed convinced that their diverse views were fairly represented in government and that their rights were adequately protected, as George Washington?s first administration and the statesmen of the First Congress strengthened popular acceptance of the new Constitution. The Revolution brought about many social changes for America, and for the first time in the history of the world established a government founded on recognition of inherent natural and unalienable rights of the individual. They brought about a most radical awareness of equal opportunity among all and instituted a government ?deriving its powers from the consent of the governed.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Canada: Becoming A Nation.

    Many Canadian felt it was time for the country to choose a flag that would show Canada had a unique identity and was separate from Britain. In 1964, with Canada's 100th birthday only 3 years away, Prime Minister Pearson said "I believe we should have a national flag that stands

  2. Federalism: a form of world government.

    In the USA despite the system of federalism created by the framers, there were still those that feared the power of the federal government. Remembering the lessons taught by the Baron de Montesquieu, they utilized a system of separation of powers to brake up the power of the federal government2.

  1. Constitutional Comparison

    What began the US Constitution was the end of the War of Independence in 1787; where French Revolutionary ideals and bruises from the previous British occupation helped mould the historical document that is still in use today. Core principles such as a dominant executive, a strong centralised government and a

  2. We Were All Created Equal

    One of the psychologists on the show was angered by people comparing blacks being discriminated against back in the past to today's issue of homosexuals being discriminated against. She believes that African-American's can't stop being black, but gays can stop being gay.

  1. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    Between 1979 and 2001, gunfire killed 90,000 children and teens in America, with over 80 Americans being killed each day through gun violence. Though this cannot necessarily be attributed to the second amendment, it cannot be denied that it is linked.

  2. The Religious Right

    (consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim.) Concerned Women for America Founded in 1979 Beverly LaHaye, wife of Christian Coalition co-founder

  1. A Passage of a Bill Through the American and Canadian Governments

    Let's trace the progress of this law-child through the government, since it is the one that has all the chances to survive the danger of getting rejected - its parents, the leading party, will make sure it becomes a law.

  2. Politics and Satire. In the United States the First Amendment protects satirists. There ...

    The technological advancements in the last 20 years have allowed satire to expand beyond poking fun into a way to expose political dishonesty. This makes politicians accountable for what they say much like a journalist would (Rosenstiel). Many of Jon Stewart?s fans view The Daily Show as a news source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work