• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The American Revolution saw the birth of a nation dedicated to equality in opportunity, government by popular consent and individual rights. How true is this?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐The presence or lack thereof, of proper rights of the individual, equal opportunity and government by popular consent following the American Revolution are heavily debated amongst historians. Undoubtedly, it is clear that not all were present in the new society, but it is impossible to deny the persistent strive to establish a fair and equal republic. Jefferson believed that equality was a gift of God through nature; it was a self-evident, natural right that society could neither give nor take away. Thus, it guaranteed all men perfect equality of human privilege (life), political and religious prerogatives (liberty), and personal opportunity (pursuit of happiness).The commonly coined phrase from the Declaration of Independence that ?All men are created equal with certain unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? was hardly true of America?s new society. ...read more.

Middle

The right to vote was cast only upon male owners of property, therefore excluding more than half the white population upon the already omitted slave population; regardless of whether or not they had been granted freedom. In contrast, equal opportunity certainly prevailed in the new society. In this age each man wanted to be free to seek a better life, he wanted to have an equal chance to rise on the ladder of well-being and denying the right to vote surely in no way hindered this. The conception of meritocracy and subsequent obliteration of deference at this time was far radical but did a world of good for the provision of equality in opportunities. A growth in colleges and public education, and the boom in nationalistic art highlight the expanding range of educated and their increasing abilities to contribute in society. ...read more.

Conclusion

These opposing views, along with economic difficulties made it hard to create a fair government, but the Founders nonetheless established written constitutions, founded on ?the consent of the governed?, and containing various institutional checks on the power of government designed to prevent it from being abused. Eventually, Americans as a whole seemed convinced that their diverse views were fairly represented in government and that their rights were adequately protected, as George Washington?s first administration and the statesmen of the First Congress strengthened popular acceptance of the new Constitution. The Revolution brought about many social changes for America, and for the first time in the history of the world established a government founded on recognition of inherent natural and unalienable rights of the individual. They brought about a most radical awareness of equal opportunity among all and instituted a government ?deriving its powers from the consent of the governed.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. We Were All Created Equal

    Such belief is not true and should be frowned upon because you are going to love the person you feel an intimate connection to. On January 1, 2002, a bill became effective to give members of registered same-sex and opposite-sex couples the right to adopt a partner's child.

  2. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    The US sees 26 times as many murders carried out by gun shootings than the UK, a country which has much stricter regulations on gun ownership. Surely each individual in the US should have a right to security, however, this security is undermined by the second amendment.

  1. The Religious Right

    (consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim.) Concerned Women for America Founded in 1979 Beverly LaHaye, wife of Christian Coalition co-founder

  2. A Passage of a Bill Through the American and Canadian Governments

    After the draft is approved by the same minister, it is presented to the Cabinet Committee on Legislation and House Planning. Once this committee has approved the draft bill, it is then signed by the prime minister and introduced in the House of Commons in its first reading by the responsible minister.

  1. This paper aims to examine Mabini's political stance for the Filipino Nation.

    Only Independence, he said, could "bring about peace and well-being in a society deeply affected by the Revolution (Mabini, p11)." However, he did not spare his fellow Filipinos his spite. The more stinging utterances made were against his very own Filipinos, those who overtly cooperated with the Americans.

  2. Federalism: a form of world government.

    Furthermore the chief merit of federalism lies in its capacity to accommodate diversity. Therefore it is inferred that federalism could be considered to be the ideal system for a country which is subdivided in sufficiently autonomous and small subunits of religion, culture, language etc.

  1. 'Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of ...

    He was responsible for the Congress-League pact of 1916, known popularly as the Lucknow Pact, the only pact ever signed between the two political organizations. Jinnah acted as the sole negotiator between both the political camps as he was a member of both institutions and held the respect of the

  2. Politics and Satire. In the United States the First Amendment protects satirists. There ...

    a dying art form; they do not have the same effect on the masses as they once did. The rising literacy rate, paired with falling newspaper sales, have caused this decline as the political satirist turn their talents to a whole new digitalized medium.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work