• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Arab-Israeli Conflict

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Arab-Israeli Conflict I think that Source A is a useful map not for explaining but showing success for the Israelis during the six-day war as it shows the land captured by the Israelis after the six-day war. This map to me shows how successful the Israelis were in the war as the land captured is double that of there own country. For such a small country it managed to capture the West Bank, the entire of the Sinai desert and the Golan Heights! But it doesn't explain how a smaller outnumbered army such as the Israelis defeated its enemy's. So I would say no, Source A is not useful for explaining the Israelis success during the six-day war. Source B is not reliable evidence that the British people supported the Arabs after the six-day war, as it is the opinion of one magazine that has a reputation of being sarcastic. It could be showing that the magazine is supportive of the Jews as it is titled the wandering Arab, there is a Jewish legend called the wandering Jew suggesting the magazine believes that what goes around comes around and its time for the Arabs to be persecuted for a change? ...read more.

Middle

As it shows a meeting between an important Israeli general and Palestinian Arab leaders, meaning the Israelis also thought that fighting would make the situation worse. And the only way to prevent it getting worse was by talking to the opposition and agreeing on some kind of seize fire or even the start of a piece process. But on the other hand the Arabs might of called this meeting instead meaning that they either wanted the same thing or wanted what was once theirs back this meaning the land captured by the Israelis during the war. But a photograph could mean anything and show a number of different views, all it really does show is the two sides meeting but it doesn't necessarily mean that either side agreed, disagreed or that anything was accomplished during the meeting. Sources F and G both have interpretations that differ but use similar evidence this I think is due to both the authors looking at different aspects of the situation. Source F shows that the Jews are not willing to negotiate and are trying to pull the same trick as in 1948 when ...read more.

Conclusion

The role of the superpowers (UK, US on the Jews side, USSR on the Arabs.) Involve talks and are places for long gain to be played. The sources are also useful in helping us understand why there was argument about the future of the Arabs, Sources A and B show the Arabs loss of land and homes, refugee camps and the Arabs being defeated. Source C shows the US helping the Jews and suggests no solution to the Arab problem. Any discussion continued shows no one helping the Arabs and no need for argument because the US will not do anything. Source D however shows the USA's desire for peace due to the oil prices going up. Then in source E the talks are in progress. Sources F and G show some progress in one area (Palestine), and nothing but argument in the other (Captured land in the war.) These sources and introduction I think don't help in trying to understand why there was so much argument about the future of Palestinian Arabs. As there is not enough detail about the Palestinian Arabs or Palestine for that matter to understand why so much argument was created in the first place. THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT By Jamie Robinson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. History Coursework: The Arab-Israeli Conflict

    British died and Britain was accused by the Palestinians of being Pro-Zionist. Meanwhile in Europe, Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, bringing strong anti-Semitism. Thousands of Jews were driven out of Germany. By 1939 there was almost 450 000 Jews in Palestine.

  2. The Arab-Israeli Conflict - Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered ...

    I believe this was a brave and courageous decision by Sadat however I believe it was justified in order to allow the tension to disappear, if Egypt could do it sent a message to all the other Arab Nations that peace with Israel was possible.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    The Arab League moved its headquarters from Cairo to Tunis. The rift was healed in 1987, and two years later, the Arab League moved back to Cairo. Meanwhile, Israel returned the Sinai to Egypt in 1982. http://www.nmhschool.org/tthornton/mehistorydatabase/war_in_lebanon.htm#peace%20treaty%20camp%20david On August 13, 1993, Israel ended the official ban on talking to the PLO.

  2. What are the main differences between the beliefs of Palestinian Arabs and Israeli Jews?The ...

    This wall would stop Arabs going in or out and was mainly directed at keeping terrorists under control. They may have thought this would stop Palestinians bombing or creating more conflict but it was not being built fairly. It was cutting Palestinians off from some of their land and completely from Jerusalem.

  1. Arab and Israeli conflict - source related study.

    I can say this because from examining the sources and looking at the people who have written it. The sources are stating their own point of view and backing up their own nation. I reply that one of the sources that is written by Terence Prittie a British writer.

  2. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    From 1965 to 1971 the PLO operated with the rule of King Hussein of Jordan. But when Jordanian army forces drove out the PLO it had moved to Lebanon. And from there it had attacked against Israel. Yasir Arafat became chairmen of the PLO, and Syrian government supported rebels within the opposite Arafat's leadership.

  1. Arab-Israeli conflict

    The Labour Party under Yiztak Rabin was very important push for peace. Yitzhak's position as a national hero meant that he could persuade peace to arrive. He had the support to get peace, even if not everybody liked him. He had enough support that he could risk a few concessions to get what hew wanted.

  2. Middle east conflict - There have been several attempts to bring peace to this ...

    They believe that the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven from Temple Mount, and this is why the Dome of the Rock is built so near to the ruins of the old Jewish city. There are a large number of other Mosques in the area, although it is fair to say

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work