• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Arab-Israeli Conflict

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Arab-Israeli Conflict I think that Source A is a useful map not for explaining but showing success for the Israelis during the six-day war as it shows the land captured by the Israelis after the six-day war. This map to me shows how successful the Israelis were in the war as the land captured is double that of there own country. For such a small country it managed to capture the West Bank, the entire of the Sinai desert and the Golan Heights! But it doesn't explain how a smaller outnumbered army such as the Israelis defeated its enemy's. So I would say no, Source A is not useful for explaining the Israelis success during the six-day war. Source B is not reliable evidence that the British people supported the Arabs after the six-day war, as it is the opinion of one magazine that has a reputation of being sarcastic. It could be showing that the magazine is supportive of the Jews as it is titled the wandering Arab, there is a Jewish legend called the wandering Jew suggesting the magazine believes that what goes around comes around and its time for the Arabs to be persecuted for a change? ...read more.

Middle

As it shows a meeting between an important Israeli general and Palestinian Arab leaders, meaning the Israelis also thought that fighting would make the situation worse. And the only way to prevent it getting worse was by talking to the opposition and agreeing on some kind of seize fire or even the start of a piece process. But on the other hand the Arabs might of called this meeting instead meaning that they either wanted the same thing or wanted what was once theirs back this meaning the land captured by the Israelis during the war. But a photograph could mean anything and show a number of different views, all it really does show is the two sides meeting but it doesn't necessarily mean that either side agreed, disagreed or that anything was accomplished during the meeting. Sources F and G both have interpretations that differ but use similar evidence this I think is due to both the authors looking at different aspects of the situation. Source F shows that the Jews are not willing to negotiate and are trying to pull the same trick as in 1948 when ...read more.

Conclusion

The role of the superpowers (UK, US on the Jews side, USSR on the Arabs.) Involve talks and are places for long gain to be played. The sources are also useful in helping us understand why there was argument about the future of the Arabs, Sources A and B show the Arabs loss of land and homes, refugee camps and the Arabs being defeated. Source C shows the US helping the Jews and suggests no solution to the Arab problem. Any discussion continued shows no one helping the Arabs and no need for argument because the US will not do anything. Source D however shows the USA's desire for peace due to the oil prices going up. Then in source E the talks are in progress. Sources F and G show some progress in one area (Palestine), and nothing but argument in the other (Captured land in the war.) These sources and introduction I think don't help in trying to understand why there was so much argument about the future of Palestinian Arabs. As there is not enough detail about the Palestinian Arabs or Palestine for that matter to understand why so much argument was created in the first place. THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT By Jamie Robinson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

    Another consequence of US-Soviet involvement was on occasion it brought the world close to nuclear disaster. On 17th September 1978 the US president Jimmy Carter acting as go between persuaded Israeli Prime minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat to sign an historic peace settlement on the basis

  2. Arab-Israeli conflict

    The problem comes though when the refugees do not become citizens. Some refugees have been settling since 1948 but they still have not accepted the status of a citizen.

  1. What are the main differences between the beliefs of Palestinian Arabs and Israeli Jews?The ...

    This was not sticking to the green line that was put on the map when a peace agreement was made to show where Palestinians would have and what would belong to Israelis.

  2. History Coursework: The Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The First World War was a turning point for both the Arab and Israeli struggle. Turkey had decided to take the side of the Axis against Britain and its allies. Britain became afraid that it's much needed oil supply from Persia (or modern-day Iran) would be cut-off by the Turks.

  1. How did the village of Dier Yassin come to be fought over in 1948, ...

    It is most useful in showing us the Arab view clearly so we can start to understand why the sides hate each other so much. The source does contain a lot of detail on the massacre which makes it possible to corroborate sources to see if it describes an isolated case.

  2. To what extent is the current 'road map to peace' likely to be more ...

    in the Middle East would be based on the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338. This stated the demand of the withdrawal of Israel from the occupied territories, acknowledgement of independent states in the Middle East, a just settlement to the refugee problem and that all parties should

  1. Conflicts over place

    As these structures are contained with in 42 square miles the potential for conflict is increased, as some religions may feel threatened by the close proximity of "foreign" religious structures. Leading them to become more protective of their own. The potential for conflict only really occurs when a particular group

  2. Palestinian refugee problem - source related study

    Source A says that 'This Zionist force included elements from the Irgun led by Menachim Begin'. Menachim Begin later became the Prime Minister of Israel. The PLO will be trying to hint that Begin was directly involved in this 'terrorist' attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work