• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The article America and Venezuela: Constitutional Worlds Apart compares and contrasts the similar yet polar opposite differences in the constitutional laws of the United States and Venezuela.

Extracts from this document...


The article America and Venezuela: Constitutional Worlds Apart compares and contrasts the similar yet polar opposite differences in the constitutional laws of the United States and Venezuela. Based on the facts presented in this article, I would have to agree that Venezuela is making tremendous progress in transforming and carrying out their constitutional laws, while the United States has for the most part remained the same since the establishment of the constitution. Although no country is perfect, the reality is that America endured plenty of issues throughout the presidency of former president George W. Bush as he portrayed all signs of corrupt laws. On the other hand, Venezuela's President Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias continues to better his country and has transformed Venezuela to what appears to be as close to a model democracy as a country can get. This is not to say that Venezuela is a "better" country rather that its strong leadership is carried out by a man who genuinely cares and acts on the peoples interests. ...read more.


Prior to his election into office, Venezuela was an extremely corrupt country where the people didn't seem to have much say about anything at all. Immediately upon his election into presidency, Chavez held a national referendum in which his people had the opportunity to decide if they wanted to draft a new constitution that would be based around his image of what he wanted the country to be like. In December of 1999 the new constitution passed under his rule which tremendously improved and continues to improve everything for the country of Venezuela. The differences in the way in which the "constitutional" laws are carried out between the two countries couldn't be more different. The United States government is comprised of three branches: the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches of government while Venezuela's is comprised of the Legislative branch, the Office of the President, and the Judicial System of government. ...read more.


Lastly, the United States Judicial branch of government (Supreme Court) comprised of the Circuit Court of Appeals which has twelve courts throughout the United States, and the District Courts (91 trial courts throughout the U.S.) Venezuela's judicial branch is a work in progress due to its corruption before Chavez came into office. The many variations between the two systems lead me to believe that the Venezuelan government is a true model democracy because while the United States has remained the same since the creation of the constitution, Venezuela has shown significant progress in making alterations to their constitution by continuing to work on making their country better literally for and by the people. The fact that Chavez got his citizens involved (and kept them involved) in these changes right away makes it a democracy in it of itself. The American governments' main interest is focused and based off of white male property owners and the constitution wasn't written to better anybody other than the people that fit into that category, while Venezuela rewrote their laws to benefit their people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. To what extent is it fair to say America is a land of 100 ...

    This dominance is exacerbated by the electoral system. Also, both parties encompass such a wide range of views that they are in effect all inclusive. The most extreme left or right wingers are members of either party. Also, successful candidates will move on policy and their beliefs to ensure the concept of being all inclusive.

  2. The Referendum

    the uncertainty of the Irish electorate over the issue of Europe in those days. This scepticism of further integration with the EU has yet to be overcome, it would appear.


    THE DEVELOPMENT OF FEDERALISM Because the Constitution did not lay down any definite line between the concurrent powers of the federal and state governments this has meant that the concept of federalism was able to develop over the subsequent centuries, federalism is not a fixed concept, it is ever changing, as America has changed so has the concept of federalism.

  2. Federalism in the United States.

    This obviously angered FDR who took the chance to re appoint judges who took his point of view and so the controversy over the matter grew as it became partizan and party politics took over. Although FDR didn't get his plans passed, two judges (Justice Roberts and Chief Justice Hughes)

  1. Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate ...

    would allow them to encroach on his authority as the leader of the federal republic. With the two main points of view on how the President should be elected, one making him too weak the other too strong, in deadlock, the compromise of an Electoral College was reached, in which the states choose the President.

  2. Power in America. The idea that the rich run America has been encompassed in ...

    Supporters of pluralism to prove their point can claim that if there were power elite, the Vietnam War would have ended long before it did. This is because the Vietnam War as it was, was bad for business, bad for education, bad for government, bad for everyone in sight.

  1. How effectively does Congress fulfil its constitutional roles

    Congress also has the role to pass money bills which are heavily important in America. Congress does provide an affective fulfilment of this role as they limit the power of the executive of dominating money of the state. This is done by committees in Congress that specialise in a particular

  2. The Separation of Church and State in America.

    in actuality they are not forcing the employers to buy birth control, they are only giving the option for the employees to get it for themselves. If the use of birth control violates someone's religious conscience they can refuse the benefit and therefore are not required to purchase it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work