• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The article America and Venezuela: Constitutional Worlds Apart compares and contrasts the similar yet polar opposite differences in the constitutional laws of the United States and Venezuela.

Extracts from this document...


The article America and Venezuela: Constitutional Worlds Apart compares and contrasts the similar yet polar opposite differences in the constitutional laws of the United States and Venezuela. Based on the facts presented in this article, I would have to agree that Venezuela is making tremendous progress in transforming and carrying out their constitutional laws, while the United States has for the most part remained the same since the establishment of the constitution. Although no country is perfect, the reality is that America endured plenty of issues throughout the presidency of former president George W. Bush as he portrayed all signs of corrupt laws. On the other hand, Venezuela's President Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias continues to better his country and has transformed Venezuela to what appears to be as close to a model democracy as a country can get. This is not to say that Venezuela is a "better" country rather that its strong leadership is carried out by a man who genuinely cares and acts on the peoples interests. ...read more.


Prior to his election into office, Venezuela was an extremely corrupt country where the people didn't seem to have much say about anything at all. Immediately upon his election into presidency, Chavez held a national referendum in which his people had the opportunity to decide if they wanted to draft a new constitution that would be based around his image of what he wanted the country to be like. In December of 1999 the new constitution passed under his rule which tremendously improved and continues to improve everything for the country of Venezuela. The differences in the way in which the "constitutional" laws are carried out between the two countries couldn't be more different. The United States government is comprised of three branches: the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches of government while Venezuela's is comprised of the Legislative branch, the Office of the President, and the Judicial System of government. ...read more.


Lastly, the United States Judicial branch of government (Supreme Court) comprised of the Circuit Court of Appeals which has twelve courts throughout the United States, and the District Courts (91 trial courts throughout the U.S.) Venezuela's judicial branch is a work in progress due to its corruption before Chavez came into office. The many variations between the two systems lead me to believe that the Venezuelan government is a true model democracy because while the United States has remained the same since the creation of the constitution, Venezuela has shown significant progress in making alterations to their constitution by continuing to work on making their country better literally for and by the people. The fact that Chavez got his citizens involved (and kept them involved) in these changes right away makes it a democracy in it of itself. The American governments' main interest is focused and based off of white male property owners and the constitution wasn't written to better anybody other than the people that fit into that category, while Venezuela rewrote their laws to benefit their people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. To what extent is it fair to say America is a land of 100 ...

    in 1971 and the Natural Law Party exists in other countries too. The America First Party and The Constitution Party is both ultra-conservative and more right wing but with their religious bent may prevent moderates from voting for them. These parties have not provided serious opposition as the USA is in effect a two party system.

  2. The Referendum

    the triple referendum of November 1992, which related to restrictions on the availability of abortion, the right to travel and the right to information. The former was rejected and the other two approved. The referendum of March 6th 2002 is also relevant to this topic, the question on this occasion

  1. Are gun control laws popular in the United States?

    During the 2008 election campaign Republican runner John McCain argued that guns should be made safer, and cheaper models should be restricted, arguing they're not as reliable. McCain declared he did not own a hand gun, yet knew how to use one, in vast contrast to this statement McCain's running


    The Supreme Court has had to interpret the constitution and settle disputes in individual cases, according to Where, once it is granted that a government is acting within its allocated sphere that government is not subordinate to any other in the United States.

  1. The paradox of power in the United States constitution.

    to written records: "Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State." Similarly, the citizens of each state are guaranteed equal treatment, regardless of which state they inhabit.

  2. In 1901 Australia's most important founding document and symbol of our national life, The ...

    powers of Commander-in-Chief of the nation's defence force, thus ensuring that any government or political group cannot use the armed forces against the people. If the constitution was altered to remove our impartial Head of State, who would assume such responsibility?

  1. Power in America. The idea that the rich run America has been encompassed in ...

    Therefore, it is evident that big business is in a good position to control political processes. According to Domhoff, "in terms of access, expertise, and sheer number of appointments, corporate involvement in the shaping of government policy is extensive". Corporate power is strong in America because money is needed for the most political policies to be carried out.

  2. How effectively does Congress fulfil its constitutional roles

    This problem is also common so therefore it?s significant as it leads to a better chance of budget deficits. Another problem is that there is a lack of consensus within Congress that it can be time consuming and disruptive. An example of ineffective fulfilment of this role would be in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work