• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Australian Constitution is the ultimate law ruling in Australia

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

On 1st January 1901 the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution came into effect, bringing together the six self-governing colonies and establishing a federal system of government. This federal system allows for Power to be divided between states and the federal government by the Australian constitution. It also allows for separation of powers between the legislature, executive and the judiciary. It must be noted that the constitution can only be amended by referendum. The High court has the role of reviewing the constitution when there is a dispute; this involves interpretation of the constitution by the judges of the high court. These high court decisions have led to an increase in power to the federal government. Another reason that the federal government now has more power than issued to it by the constitution is due of state to federal agreements on certain laws. The constitution is the overruling law in Australia that was passed by the British in 1900 in a statute called the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). This is the outline of the Commonwealth; setting out how the new federation would be established and the guidelines for the way Australians would shape their nation. The Constitution is also the outline for the lives of Australians, providing the authority for the powers by which our legislators make laws, our executive government implements them, and how our courts operate. ...read more.

Middle

formalized the position of the Loan Council * Social Services (28 September 1946) gave the Commonwealth power to provide certain social services * Aborigines (27 May 1967) gave the Commonwealth power to make laws for Aboriginal people resident in the States and to include all Aboriginal people in the national census * Casual Vacancies (21 May 1977) aimed at ensuring that a replacement Senator should be from the same party as the departing Senator * Territory Votes (21 May 1977) gave residents of the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory the right to vote in constitutional referendums * Retirement of Judges (21 May 1977) provided for a retirement age for all federal judges. http://www.aph.gov.au/library/elect/referend/rintrod.htm One way of understanding why this is so, is by considering two viewpoints made by two highly knowledgeable and exceedingly recognized people in the area of Australian law. The Honorable Anthony Murray Gleeson, AC currently Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in Canberra said "...The reason why only 8 out of 42 referenda have been accepted is that the public, (or more accurately a sufficient number of the public to block the proposals for change), have not been persuaded of the merit of the change. A constitution is an instrument that is intended to be permanent. It shouldn't be able to be altered by a temporarily fashionable political view" And As said by Sue Tongue, Principal Member and CEO of the Migration Review Tribunal "...having worked on a referendum campaign, I despair of ever getting any referenda through. ...read more.

Conclusion

Under the Australian Constitution the States may, by mutual agreement with the Federal government, refer their law-making powers to the Federal Parliament. Referendums have had little effect on the division of powers this is because of the fact that the constitution's words have rarely been changed by a referendum, Even though the division of power has changed considerably since 1901 this has been because of High court decisions and state to federal agreements and not due to any referendums. And in conclusion, it is clear that Australia runs by a federal system of government with a constitution that allows for division and separation of powers. It is also said that the constitution has been greatly effected by the high court, as it is the judges of this court who must interpret the constitution to come to some sort of conclusion when a dispute has been put towards them. Although referendums have the ability to amend the constitution and in 8 occasions it has done so, it must be known that there have been 34 occasions where the referendum put forward to the public have been rejected. Decisions made by high court on constitutional matters have changed the division of powers, giving the federal government more jurisdictions over the state. Agreements made between states to the federal government have also led to an increase of power that the Federal governments hold. Overall, the federal government holds more jurisdiction than it was intended to have originally by those who had planned the constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Doctrine of the separation of powers.

    In the historic decision of Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury V Madison the Supreme Court assumed the power of declaring both Acts of Congress and Acts of the President to be unconstitutional. In fact the separation of powers in the USA does not involve the isolation of each organ from

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    As Britain did resolutely stand shoulder to shoulder with our Atlantic cousin, there may be cause to be more circumspect than some other European countries. It is clear democracy is being undermined. It seems the ECHR has been made part of the British constitution, but only to an extent the present government are satisfied with it.

  1. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    Gibbon vs. Ogden 1824 Supreme Court decision that established that states could not interfere with the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The state of New York had authorized a monopoly on steamboat operation in its waters, an action upheld by a state chancery court, but the Supreme Court

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    The United States Constitution, even according to Attorney General Mukasey in his confirmation hearings, prohibits torture under the Fifth (self incrimination), Eighth (cruel and unusual punishment) and Fourteenth Amendments (deprive an individual the equal protection of the laws etc.). It has been interpreted that the due process rights include barring evidence-gathering techniques that "shock the conscience" (Rochin Vs.

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    The fact that the size of the federal government can grow vastly, and then shrink, suggests that federalism is not a very effective means of limiting government, since the national government grew vastly in size and influence, far greater than any of the Founding Fathers of the constitution wanted.

  2. The Separation of Church and State in America.

    In March 2004 Nashala Hearn was forced to remove her hijab because it violated the dress code, which the justice department believes to be unconstitutional. (Religious Discrimination in Schools: Discrepancies with Religion in Schools .http://sitemaker.umich.edu/hwaters/discrepancies_with_religion_in_schools). The sixth grader was suspended twice for wearing the religious headdress and was ultimately forced to choose between her public education and her religion.

  1. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    They wanted to believe that relying on the people to have the power would be a good thing. In some cases, it may, but in others, it may be a horrible idea. Dividing the powers is a much more reasonable and logical way, that way no one area has too

  2. Mitt Romney and Barack Obama both have different viewpoints and proposals when it comes ...

    ?Dodd-Frank also asked the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to create additional regulation for the riskiest derivatives, like credit default swaps, and commodities futures. It also asked the SEC to recommend how the credit rating agencies, like Moody's and Standard & Poor's, could be improved? (Obama's Economic Policies).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work