• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Australian Constitution is the ultimate law ruling in Australia

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

On 1st January 1901 the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution came into effect, bringing together the six self-governing colonies and establishing a federal system of government. This federal system allows for Power to be divided between states and the federal government by the Australian constitution. It also allows for separation of powers between the legislature, executive and the judiciary. It must be noted that the constitution can only be amended by referendum. The High court has the role of reviewing the constitution when there is a dispute; this involves interpretation of the constitution by the judges of the high court. These high court decisions have led to an increase in power to the federal government. Another reason that the federal government now has more power than issued to it by the constitution is due of state to federal agreements on certain laws. The constitution is the overruling law in Australia that was passed by the British in 1900 in a statute called the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). This is the outline of the Commonwealth; setting out how the new federation would be established and the guidelines for the way Australians would shape their nation. The Constitution is also the outline for the lives of Australians, providing the authority for the powers by which our legislators make laws, our executive government implements them, and how our courts operate. ...read more.

Middle

formalized the position of the Loan Council * Social Services (28 September 1946) gave the Commonwealth power to provide certain social services * Aborigines (27 May 1967) gave the Commonwealth power to make laws for Aboriginal people resident in the States and to include all Aboriginal people in the national census * Casual Vacancies (21 May 1977) aimed at ensuring that a replacement Senator should be from the same party as the departing Senator * Territory Votes (21 May 1977) gave residents of the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory the right to vote in constitutional referendums * Retirement of Judges (21 May 1977) provided for a retirement age for all federal judges. http://www.aph.gov.au/library/elect/referend/rintrod.htm One way of understanding why this is so, is by considering two viewpoints made by two highly knowledgeable and exceedingly recognized people in the area of Australian law. The Honorable Anthony Murray Gleeson, AC currently Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in Canberra said "...The reason why only 8 out of 42 referenda have been accepted is that the public, (or more accurately a sufficient number of the public to block the proposals for change), have not been persuaded of the merit of the change. A constitution is an instrument that is intended to be permanent. It shouldn't be able to be altered by a temporarily fashionable political view" And As said by Sue Tongue, Principal Member and CEO of the Migration Review Tribunal "...having worked on a referendum campaign, I despair of ever getting any referenda through. ...read more.

Conclusion

Under the Australian Constitution the States may, by mutual agreement with the Federal government, refer their law-making powers to the Federal Parliament. Referendums have had little effect on the division of powers this is because of the fact that the constitution's words have rarely been changed by a referendum, Even though the division of power has changed considerably since 1901 this has been because of High court decisions and state to federal agreements and not due to any referendums. And in conclusion, it is clear that Australia runs by a federal system of government with a constitution that allows for division and separation of powers. It is also said that the constitution has been greatly effected by the high court, as it is the judges of this court who must interpret the constitution to come to some sort of conclusion when a dispute has been put towards them. Although referendums have the ability to amend the constitution and in 8 occasions it has done so, it must be known that there have been 34 occasions where the referendum put forward to the public have been rejected. Decisions made by high court on constitutional matters have changed the division of powers, giving the federal government more jurisdictions over the state. Agreements made between states to the federal government have also led to an increase of power that the Federal governments hold. Overall, the federal government holds more jurisdiction than it was intended to have originally by those who had planned the constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    In federal matters the U.S. Constitution gives the House of Representatives the power to impeach civil officers of the United States, including the President and Vice President, but not including members of Congress. Impeachments are tried by the Senate, with the concurrence of two thirds of the members present needed for conviction.

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    The defence is in three parts. The first is a global defence based on a specific interpretation of the constitution. The second reflects particular responses to particular accusations. The third is a plea of guilty, but in extenuating circumstances for some particular aspects of the case.

  1. "A written constitution, rather than gradual reform, is now essential for the UK to ...

    The key issues that are arguments against the written constitution are the it is unnecessary because gradual reform still works well, it is undesirable because power would be transferred to an unelected body of judges and that it would be unachievable due to the fact that there would be disagreement

  2. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    but prevent the power of the Government from being too centralised, which is presently a major criticism of the Government. Even when, Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister she agreed that the Government power was too centralised, and needed some sort of restraint.

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    The states had most of the political power, governing themselves. Grodzins labelled this era as being ?layer-cake? federalism, where the federal and state governments had distinct areas of responsibility[22]. The next stage of federalism was ?cooperative federalism?, which came about after the Wall Street crash, and the Great Depression.

  2. The Separation of Church and State in America.

    ?natural family? standard and it would hurt family morals, leading to an increase in things such as homosexuality (Young, Equal Rights, Gay Rights and the Mormon Church ). Religious groups, not only the mormons, have a lot of foothold in the communities of our country, when any group directly affiliated

  1. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    the same time, adapting and changing with the country, as reflected in its amendments. While the United States Constitution itself outlines the basic structure of the federal government, its twenty seven amendments address many subjects, but primarily focus on the rights of individual American citizens (The Bill of Rights).

  2. Mitt Romney and Barack Obama both have different viewpoints and proposals when it comes ...

    concise information that one might need in order to make the best financial decisions. Both Romney and Obama have different stances when it comes to the country?s Economic Policy, but one might agree that Obama?s proposals demonstrate a stronger and more successful point of view when it comes to the future of our country?s economy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work