• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Cabinets role in decision making has been marginalised in recent governments

Extracts from this document...


Explain the term cabinet committees. (5 marks) Much of the decision-making orchestrated within the Core Executive is performed by cabinet committees which are appointed by the Prime Minister. They have two principal purposes: to uphold the convention of Collective Cabinet Responsibility and to reduce the workload of the Cabinet and there are two types of cabinet committees: those which are ad-hoc that deal with unexpected or temporary issues (e.g. COBRA), the other being standing committees which are named and permanent. They usually comprise departmental ministers and a representative of the Treasury (each department needs to control its budgetary allowance). A minority of the committees are significant in the way in which the Government determines its policy; in this case, senior members of the Cabinet (including the Prime Minister) usually chair such meetings. Conclusions made in these committees are often then presented to the Cabinet for consideration in a wider context. For example, the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games is responsible for liaising with the Government on the planning, construction and general evaluation in respect to the 2012 Olympic Games in London - the official Government policy is then based on their recommendations. However, in practice, the Cabinet Committees may not reach a verdict upon the topic which they set; in which case, the Cabinet will then lose time discussing a topic which may detract away from more significant policies - it may even cause damaging splits in the Cabinet as fellow department ministers stand at two different viewpoints. Consider how significant the doctrine of collective cabinet responsibility is in modern British politics. ...read more.


In this respect, the doctrine has been completely ignored and been utterly dependent on the influence granted to it by the Prime Minister. It has a key role in the effective functioning of a Cabinet Government, however, in an administration led by a figure who feels this is obstructive to progress, it has little or no weight unless it can somehow change public opinion, force a vote of no confidence and the resignation of the entire governing party. 'The Cabinet's role in decision making has been marginalised in recent governments.' Discuss. (25 marks) Traditional theory dictates that the Cabinet is the dominant decision-making body within the Core Executive, where Ministers convene to co-ordinate the policy making of individual departments and thus the overall work of the Government. All senior ministers are chosen by the Prime Minister and they are all collectively delegated the power to direct the Government. Under the doctrine of a Cabinet government, all members have equal status - apart from the PM who has the recognised position of primus inter pares (first amongst equals). Recently, however, the collective power held by the Cabinet has weakened somewhat, especially under Blair and Thatcher, though this has largely depended on the leadership style preferred by the PM in office. There are several predominant roles of the Cabinet which include: devising major policy (although this is often stated in the manifesto before election, priorities have to be made, legislative ideas converted into practice and contextual circumstances to be accounted for); addressing unforeseen major problems (such as the current H1N1 'swine flu' outbreak); harmonising the actions of ...read more.


Given all that, it would appear that the Cabinet is not currently functioning to the extent that traditional understanding would have us think it should. I utterly agree with the statement that the role of the Cabinet in decision-making has been deeply marginalised within recent administrations, and with that, I accept that the influence of the Cabinet is wholly and comprehensively linked to the context of the personality of the Prime Minister 'at the helm'. It is also true that Prime Ministerial power has acquired a new significance in recent years where they can forge decisions without the use of the Cabinet as a tool to manage or compass opinion. For instance, the EU has a significant function in top-level decision making insofar that it requires the divine attention of the Prime Minister alone, and not the Cabinet. As an informal ambassador for the United Kingdom, it is the responsibility of the PM to negotiate deals which secure: EU funding for the UK's economy, EU partner countries' assistance in the Afghan War et cetera and in order for him to do this, considerable autonomy has to be granted. The same is true for other meetings in the recent past, such as the G20 Meeting in London where the PM held high-level talks with other wealthy nations in order to establish a trillion dollar deal to effectively 'rescue' the world economy. All of this has been at the expense of a Cabinet which needs to be reckoned with, otherwise, in times of desperate need, the Prime Minister will not find support at his or hers' weakest moments in their premierships. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Politics task

    Referenda provide a clear answer to a question the government might be 'asking' as if the government was asking should be apart of the EU or not and could call a referendum to see what the people think, like they did in 1975.

  2. priministers power

    * Mrs Thatcher ultimately failed as a party leader because she believed she could ignore senior figures in the party. o Evidence for the Presidential Thesis - The prime minister is responsible for directing and organising the work of the government at the highest level.

  1. Laurier Evaluation

    Laurier had good intentions, he tried to help answer the question that was raised, as to why to buy expensive items from central Canada when you can get the same item cheaper from the U.S.A.

  2. "To what extent have west European prime ministers full control of their cabinets? Discuss ...

    authority.3 "The parliamentary system is distinguished by the head of government being dependent on the direct or indirect support of the parliament, often expressed through a vote of confidence. Hence, there is no clear-cut separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government.

  1. Evaluate the above statement and consider the extent to which you think it is ...

    to his instructions is enough by itself to force a proposal through the House of Commons is as much a question of mathematics as political theory: if the majority party has a large enough majority, which is a theoretical possibility if not a particularly likely contingency, the application of the

  2. Unit 1 - Example of Evaluations

    I might also look for a different layout for my questionnaire, because although I feel it is laid out well I believe this is one of the reason why there is a lot of empty space and so this is something I would look to rectify.

  1. How, and with what success, have governments attempted to improve the provision of health ...

    In support for private involvement are the Conservatives whom are in consensus with Labour but are not in agreement with the NHS seeing an extra �20 million spent of maximising the involvement of private firms as prior focus should be placed on what is occurrence rather than what could be.

  2. Where does the decision making power lie in the British executive: with the Prime ...

    Notable examples of Parliamentary sovereignty include the removal of Chamberlain from power in 1940 as Parliament lost faith in him and some of his Cabinet The extension of the Westminster model from this premise was based on analysis of governmental and party politics, the growth in strength and coherency of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work