• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Common Agricultural Policy.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Common Agricultural Policy Virtually all governments intervene in their country's agricultural markets in an attempt to alter or regulate the production and trade of products. Governments often view agriculture as a 'special' sector worthy of their intervention. Indeed, interventionists argue that there is a need to stabilize agricultural prices to protect the consumer, create a certain amount of self-sufficiency within a country, and improve efficiency and productivity in the agricultural business. One of the largest examples of intervention in the agricultural sector is the Common Agricultural Policy, which is co-ordinated by the European Commission. The Common Agricultural Policy was proposed in 1960 by the six members of the European Economic Community, but only came into effect in January. It was introduced at a time of great food shortages, which resulted in a large percentage of food being imported. The Common Agricultural Policy had many aims. These included: * Increasing agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour. * Ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture. * Stabilising markets * Ensuring the availability of supplies. * Ensuring that supplies reach the consumers at reasonable prices. For the main agricultural products the system works in the following way. Each year the council of Ministers sets a target price for the product for the next agricultural year (April to March). ...read more.

Middle

Consumers lost out in two ways. First, they had to pay directly for food, which was much higher in price, than it would otherwise have been if it had been bought on world markets. Second, as taxpayers they had to pay for the heavy costs of running the CAP. In theory, he CAP should have been fairly inexpensive to run. If there was a glut of produce on the market in one season, the EU would buy some of it at the intervention price and store it. The next season, when there was perhaps a shortage, the EU could take the produce out of storage and sell it. Prices would not fluctuate by as much as under a market system and the sale of produce would ensure that the major cost of the system would be administration and storage. In practice the cost of CAP rose year after year. This was due to the CAP agencies buying more than they were selling. The CAP resulted in considerable excess of many agricultural products. The longer-term effects on supply magnify the problem. As producers are now faced with a guaranteed demand for their products, there is every incentive to produce more. This is exactly what happened in Europe during the 1970s and 1980s. Producers began to increase their levels of production of agricultural products, which led to the accumulation of large surpluses of certain farm products. These surpluses are expensive to store and export, and if they are sold abroad at relatively low prices, they tend to lower world prices and hence reduce the incomes of producers in other countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

In particular a quota system for milk was imposed. Each farm in the EU was given a milk quota based on existing production levels minus a given percentage to reduce the milk surplus, which had developed. This is demonstrated in the diagram below. A quota at output level Q2 restricts the supply of milk. This reduces the excess supply from a level of Q3 - Q1 to a smaller level of Q2-Q1, therefore reducing the expenditure under CAP. The financial crisis worsened despite this and in 1987 Cap was forced to transfer some spending over into 1988 because it had run out of money in its budget. This led to the member countries agreeing to an increase in spending on CAP. In 1980s there was a general agreement that the CAP should be reformed further. The reforms since 1985 have tended to tackle the outcomes rather than the root cause of the problem. The root cause of the problem was that agricultural prices had been set too high in relation to the world price. Too high prices encourage farmers to produce too much and discourage consumption. Surpluses have to be disposed of, sometimes onto world markets at knock down prices, which angers farmers in other countries who complain on 'unfair competition'. The reforms have concentrated on restricting supply rather than reducing prices. This had consequently not been successful. The MacSharry reforms aimed to lower agricultural prices to levels, which were more in line with world prices. This was one of the only reforms, which had proved successful. This was hopefully the end to large surpluses. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    It will cost Boots approxmently 40 million in preparations for the euro, this 40 million will be used to update systems and get the company ready for the euro. Benefits to Boots will be less conversion costs, suppliers more like to trade as same currency.

  2. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    in order to win re-election...In a stunning reversal of post-war German policy, Schr�der (via his campaign manager) ruled out German support for an attack on Iraq even if sanctioned by the UN.11 This hard line was something new for Germany, and it incensed Washington, who then sought to further ostracize Schr�der.

  1. EU actorness in relation to Environment policy and Development policy: An evaluation.

    In order to achieve a level of actorness on a global scale the European Union must take every chance it is given to get involved in global issues. As the worlds largest trading block in is inevitable that the EU must involve itself in matters of global trade but in

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    The talks on Economic and Monetary Union were resumed after 1985, when EMU progressively started to be considered a necessary complement to the single market. In 1988 Jacques Delors who was the President of the European Commission was asked to study the creation of the EMU.

  1. LEGAL ASPECTS OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

    The seller should "make clear the procedure that must be followed before the contract is formed" (Elborne 2000). The acceptance of the offeree is very important because without acceptance there is no contract. In UK, the contract is formed when the supplier receive the acceptance.

  2. Common Agricultural Policy

    Instruments The CAP is an integrated system of measures which works by maintaining commodity price levels within the EU and by subsidising production. There are three principal mechanisms: * Import Tariffs are applied to specified goods imported into the EU.

  1. In 1957 the Common

    M pp309) Each year prices for Agricultural goods is set by the Council of Agricultural ministers which comprised of Agricultural ministers from each state. The European commission bought and released agricultural produce as to keep the prices set by the ministers stable and as a result of the nature of

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Several initiatives were launched or upgraded. The information about the different systems discussed here is taken from the Red Book of the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (2003). The cooperative banks use TIPANET (Transferts Interbancaires de Paiement Automatis�s). This system is managed by the TIPA Group S.C., that has

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work