• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Common Agricultural Policy.

Extracts from this document...


The Common Agricultural Policy 1) The 5 objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) set out in Article 39 of the Treaty of Rome were: * To increase agricultural productivity * To ensure a fair standard of living for farmers * To stabilise markets * To guarantee availability of supplies * To ensure fair prices for consumers 2) An intervention price is a price at which the EU/government will buy produce from the producer. It is a fixed price, and it is the minimum price that the producer will get for their goods. In this case, the EU established an intervention price at which it would buy the produce from the farmers. As a result the farmers could either choose to sell their produce on the open market or sell it to the EU for the minimum fixed price. As a result of the intervention price scheme farmers increased their production - knowing that no matter how much they produced, the EU would buy it. Naturally supply began to outstrip demand. Instead of the EU selling the produce produced by the farmers, they have stored them in large warehouses and as a result the infamous lakes and mountains have developed. This excess produce then had to be sold, often at a fraction of the cost of production, and some was even destroyed. ...read more.


As a result, many farmers would go bankrupt and many jobs would be lost in the countryside. Consequently there would be mass rural-to-urban migration causing major depopulation in the countryside. As a result the countryside would deteriorate and taxpayers would lose out, as they would have to pay for the rejuvenation of the countryside. This is an argument from farmers who are reluctant for reform. Also, many farmers in Spain, Italy and France are against reform as they are the main beneficiaries from the CAP. In fact many of farmers are against CAP reform, as they would stand to lose a lot if it was reformed - and so through their own greed they oppose the notion of reforming the CAP. 6) If the EU was enlarged, then this would have a major impact on the CAP. This is because a large of majority of the members would be from Eastern Europe. And so, hypothetically, 10 new member states from Eastern Europe - most with large, poor agricultural sectors would qualify for billions of euros in subsidies under an unreformed CAP. These countries have a greater dependency on farming as a source of income and jobs. Many of the farms in these countries are much smaller and poorer than their Western European counterparts - a major problem given the bias within the CAP to offer disproportionately more financial support to larger more efficient farms. ...read more.


The effects of reform in the short to medium term will vary from nation to nation within the EU and there are likely to be significant regional implications for individual countries. Some of the main issues to consider are as follows: Will reductions in direct payments for production stimulate increases in farm productivity arising from a switch to larger-scale production? Will reforms to the CAP stimulate improvements in the efficiency of the UK and European farming industry? Supporters of reform believe that cutting dependency on financial support will encourage farmers to diversify the use of their land including breaking into rural tourism and focusing resources on supplying niche products to local markets. Will there be sufficient geographical and occupational mobility in the farming industry to offset many of the likely tensions and problems that structural change will cause? The main risk is a sharp rise in structural unemployment and associated problems of rural poverty. That said, the British farming industry has suffered greatly in recent years even without fundamental reforms to the CAP. Will there be massed forced sales of land leading to a collapse in farm land prices? And, how will smaller farms survive? Should governments target financial assistance on poorer farmers? All these problems and more need to be considered and then reform can take place for a better and more successful CAP. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    Attitudes and values, are different in some countries in relation to matters such as time keeping and appointments. Attitudes and values differ from countries to countries, it might be considered rude to question elders but in some acceptable. Religion, this is very important to a lot of individuals, such matters

  2. The EU automotive industry currently faces a number of issues. It lags behind the ...

    They would have to weigh out the options between the cost of building a new plant in a less developed country or taking over an existing plant in a more developed country. Figure 3 - Greenfield versus Brownfield sites Language Barriers Moving to Eastern Europe would mean moving to a different country.

  1. EU actorness in relation to Environment policy and Development policy: An evaluation.

    Coherence- this is based on the ability of the internal institutions to act together. In most areas the supranational institutions of the union are able to work along side each other, each with their own specific tasks but it s not always possible.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    Also the new countries that wish to join need to create: * The conditions for its integration through the adjustment of its administrative structures, so that European Community legislation transposed into national legislation is implemented effectively through appropriate administrative and judicial structures.

  1. Common Agricultural Policy

    This applies to some countries which had a traditional trade link with a member country. An obstacle to Community trade is the diversity of national laws regarding production or trade. Examples are the use of preservatives, coloring agents, hormones and disease control (e.g.during the foot and mouth disease outbreak in the United Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands).

  2. In 1957 the Common

    for 26% of its labour force in 1955 feared Germany with 18% (El-Agraa, Ali.M. 2001 pg 232) may take its place as the dominant force in E.U industry. It was imperative for France to protect its Farmers. On this matter it is only when reforms are mentioned does the Common Agricultural Policy become controversial.

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Banks in all euro area countries are represented by the respective association of their country. The statements of these associations on Regulation 2560/2001 are generally quite neutral, except for the Bundesverband Deutscher Banken. In a speech, dr. Wolfgang Arnold, vice-president of this German association of banks, mentions some points of criticism against the regulation.

  2. Sustainable development or fish eat fish world? 'EU external trade policy'.

    During the 90's, the EC concluded important economic agreements like the EEA11 and the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements, enlargement agreements were negotiated with some of the former EFTA countries and association agreements with Eastern European countries and investment agreements.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work