• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this verdict on the Congress System.

Extracts from this document...


"The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this verdict on the Congress System. There were several reasons for why the Congress System failed to succeed, among these the conflicting interests of the Great Powers. In order for us to judge whether or not the conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable, it is necessary to identify what were the other reasons and assess their importance, thus drawing a fair conclusion. Most historians use the term 'Congress System' or 'Concert of Europe' to describe the period after 1815 when the Great Powers attempted to co-operate in order to maintain peace after the collapse of Napoleonic France. This 'Congress' can be resumed to four periodic meetings: at Aix-la-Chapelle in 1818; Troppau in 1820; Laibach in 1821; and Verona in 1822; and from these conferences, the birth of the term 'Congress system', perhaps a bit too ambitious. Along with the conflicting aims of the Great Powers; the extinction of common purpose, no organizational system, influence of individuals, and internal disagreements were essential for the Congress' failure. The Congress System was established with the initial purpose of making reforms to the Vienna Settlement, as a great period of peace had resulted from this settlement, and improving the life of the people. Thus two alliances, the Holly Alliance and Quadruple Alliance, were created. ...read more.


There was no such thing as a Congress System. Not only because of the conflicting interests of the Great Powers, but also because of the lack of a permanent organization. Without a permanent organization, no material was collected for examination, no agenda was created and no rules were agreed upon; thus making it impossible to achieve and carry out tasks and objectives. For this simple reason one can say that if anything, the Congress System was a mere utopia. The meetings randomly occurred and there was no agreement between the Great Powers as to what the Congresses were for. This proves that with no organizational system and no clear objectives of the Great Powers since the beginning only led to its inevitable failure. Furthermore, the influence of individuals played a very active role on the fall of the Congress System. In 1825, Tsar Alexander of Russia dies and is succeeded by Nicholas I. The new emperor was indifferent to the Quadruple Alliance, for he did not participate in its creation or its activities. Nicholas I also disliked Metternich, leading him to support Greek revolutionaries, thus going against the Troppau Protocol, since he was actually encouraging revolts instead of oppressing them. Simultaneously, Canning was doing anything he could possibly do to make the Congress System fall apart; for he believed the original purpose of this congress was betrayed by the Great Powers in order to fulfill their own interests. ...read more.


France also agrees to the treaty, only Austria and Prussia do not take part, changing the whole nature of the Great Power relations. In Spain, the revolt developed into a civil war. Both France and Russian were willing to intervene and oppress the revolution, but neither Metternich nor Castlereagh were interested. After Castlereagh committed suicide, Canning replaced him, again changing the course of events, since Canning had no interest on the Congress System for he believed in the rule that 'every nation for itself.' Canning did not co-operate on Spain and finally withdrawn from the Congress. Without Britain and without any respect towards their values and interests, the Congress System was reaching its final stage. The term 'Congress System' is vague, and like so many of the 'systems' in history, the congress System is probably an invention of historians. Certainly because it was anything but systematic; there was no agreement between the powers on what the congresses were for; and no common purpose was present whatsoever. None of the alliances or treaties were respected, instead were ignored when the Powers wanted to achieved their personal goals. If nothing, the Congress System only brought more chaos and confusion to Europe, with the exception of Greece; almost revived militant Jacobinism; and proved the selfish character of the Great Powers. Since the beginning the conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable; since the beginning the Congress System was destined to fail. Carolina Andreoli History HL 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    This proves that pressure groups do not become too powerful and are therefore good for the democratic process. Despite the evidence above, Elitists, believe differently, as demonstrated by C. Wright Mills in 'The Power Elite', "a small elite with interconnected interests govern America and powerful and wealthy interest groups dominate decision making."

  2. "Compare the successes and failures of Castlereagh and Canning's Foreign Policies"

    To make amends, he signed a Treaty with the French, where it was stated that they would not intervene in any other Spanish colonies, for example, countries such as Argentina, Colombia, Cuba and etc. He diplomatically recognised independence of these states and was hailed as a major influence in the liberation process.

  1. "The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this veredict ...

    The lack of British incentive for crucial decisions that surely influenced on the System's collapse is one good example of how conflicting interests hindered the Congress System's actions. The second congress, known as the Congress of Troppau, was held in Dec.

  2. Assess the power and significance of congress.

    will rarely have a house by more than a two thirds majority. This makes the relationship between the presidency and congress a very important one. Both rely on the strength of one another, as no one has the power to be dominant.

  1. Power and Significance Of Congress

    arguably its reluctance to pass lots of legislation due to its strong scrutiny is a positive thing. Congress's third and final main function is oversight. Oversight is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but it is an implied power of Congress and is a key part of the checks and balances that are crucial to the Constitution.

  2. Free essay

    Should the primary system be reformed?

    Thus, Clinton had a huge nationwide lead in the polls in early 2008, but Obama's unexpected victory in Iowa propelled him towards the nomination. This tendency to bemoan the impact of money on the primaries is also perhaps a little naive.

  1. Using Suetonius and Res Gestae, assess how effective Octavian was in enlisting Senatorial Support ...

    However he still held the consulship and this makes many of the senatorial class angry because there was one less position to get hold of, and so there was only power and money for one of the contenders of the consulship, as there was only one consular position left.

  2. Doctrine of the separation of powers.

    Sovereign is the head of the executive but her role is more ceremonial. However contrary to the USA doctrine of separations ministers are by convention members of the legislature. While this is a breach of the doctrine it can rationalised by saying that it promotes the responsibility of ministers by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work