• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this veredict on the Congress System.

Extracts from this document...


"The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this veredict on the Congress System. In this essay, I'm going to assess to what extent was the conflicting interests between Austria, Russia, Britain, France and Prussia responsible for the Congress System's failure, as the above statement suggests. To do this I will have to analyse how did these contradictory interests lead to the collapse of the System and analyse the other important factors such as: the lack of a common enemy, the change in staff, the lack of set aims and objectives and the lack of organization and look at very important events that started at 1818, where the Great European powers met in a sequence of congresses to discuss some specific affairs. But by the end of 1822, the real purpose of the Congress System was still not understood. Specific affairs such as the rising revolutions between those 4 years and what was to be done about France led to the preoccupation of the Great Powers, which decided to meet in a sequence of congresses. The first congress, called Aix-la-Chapelle dealt with the France issue and was organized in 1818, where the allies reviewed their dealings with France and even though France was kept under invigilation in case an intervention was necessary, they decided to create to include it in the major powers forming a Quintuple alliance. ...read more.


With all that, as a bonus, Metternich is also able to hinder British (as he had indirect British assistance and the British were quite happy with Metternich's measures) and Russian expansion. Again, the difficulty between the main powers to comprehend the concepts of the happening events was a big obstacle for their common harmony, and the Congress System's fall down was partially due to Metternich's abilities and triumph. By 1823, Metternich, that was too worried in manipulating other leaders, was incapable of putting down some revolutions and these ones took great proportions. So France seeks this opportunity to prove its independence and invades Spain outside the congress system and stops the revolution. France was also improving diplomatic relations with Russia as they had 2 common enemies; Austria and Britain. In the same year, Castleareagh dies suddenly and is replaced by Canning- whose policy was to not get involved in European dealings. In 1827, Tsar Alexander dies and is replaced by Nicholas- whose policy was totally against Metternich and he wanted to bring back together Greece and Russia in their religious union. This leads to an invasion in 1827 where a new sovereign Greece is formed. This all proves that if the European Powers really had the intention of securing international harmony and if they had acted accordingly, the Congress System maybe would have been triumphant. ...read more.


The lack of organisation in the Congress System is another extremely important reason for its failure. It is really easy to spot it, as the congress did not have any kind of foundation document to make the Quintuple Alliance work together and no set of signatures. There were no regular meetings, the congress only occurred when it was necessary. To the actual fact, the congresses were simply meetings of the leaders of the European powers to discuss the problems being faced. This lack of organization decreases the efficiency of the Congress System dramatically as actions took longer to be taken and its reliability was smaller as no signatures and documents were actually produced. To answer if a system was successful or not, we need to know if it was able to accomplish it's aims. However, the Congress System did not have any aim to achieve, proving its disorganization and irrelevance. The historian LCB Seamen even goes further and says that the Congress System, as many other systems studied in history, was an invention of the historians. Maybe his opinion is too radical, but we can conclude that there were other very significant factors that made the failure of the congress system inevitable apart from the conflicting interests of the major powers - but the conflicting interests were the most significant motive of the collapse of the Congress System. Maria Isabel Kossmann History HL - Mr. Nash -1- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. "The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this verdict ...

    The Great Powers, except for Britain, influenced by Austrian Metternich, in order to maintain peace, oppressed popular revolts instead of encouraging them. The powers failed to differentiate between constitutional reform and militant Jacobinism. In fact, they only saw what they wanted to see, regardless of what had been agreed or discussed; or what was better for the people.

  2. Federalism essay

    Like Germany, the Constitution of the United States is built around the concept of the separation of powers and a system of checks and balances. This Constitution was drawn up in 1787 by the Founding Fathers, to replace the weak confederation that had existed since the Declaration of Independence.

  1. Power and Significance Of Congress

    and 2 generals. As well as this, Congress was able to check the President regularly, with 4 of Bush's vetoes overturned in his last 2 years. It is therefore clear to see that Congressional oversight depends on whether government is united or divided, with very different results depending on this.

  2. "The Meiji Constitution (1889) was a blend of many conflicting ideas." Discuss.

    However, this idea of appeasement was opposed to the idea of necessity. Democratic institutions were considered the inevitable course of progress. Strong and advanced countries like Britain, France, and the United States all had a Constitution and this convinced the Meiji leaders that Japan with a constitution would be recognized eventually as an advanced country.

  1. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    Again, this interlinks with the effects of pressure groups building iron triangles. Groups such as those that represent various ethnic Americans are good examples. These can include the American Jewish Congress or the Organisation of Chinese Americans. Critics view such groups as splitting society by accentuating 'me' rather than 'we'.

  2. "An admirable and enlightened example of international co-operation.' Does the congress System (1815-25) deserve ...

    They thought "peace" was no revolutions, for they thought the revolutions had an immediate danger threatens other countries, especially the multi-racial ones, such as themselves. In this essay, the meaning of "peace" is quite similar to the British one, but not the Austrian, Russian, Prussian ones as they were a little bit selfish on this point.

  1. Free essay

    Should the primary system be reformed?

    In some respects this discontinuity can be seen as a good thing: states with comparatively small populations are given a chance to have an impact; if all the primaries were held at the same time, states like Iowa would become irrelevant, when contrasted with states like California, New York and Texas, which seat far more delegates.

  2. The Religious Right

    They believe that society has suffered "devastating cultural consequences" from adopting materialism and that science is the cause of this decay into materialism since science seeks only natural explanations. Science is therefore atheistic, they claim. They believe that the theory of evolution implies that humans have no spiritual nature, no moral purpose and no intrinsic meaning.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work