• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The congress of Vienna.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Social assignment The congress of Vienna was Sept., 1814-June, 1815, one of the most important international conferences in European history, called to remake Europe after the downfall of Napoleon I. It was brought together to restore a balance of power so that no one country could be in a position to dominate Europe as Napoleon had. The major characters involved in the Congress of Vienna included Alexander, the current Czar of Russia, Tallyrand who represented France, Castlereagh the representation of Great Britain, and the man considered to be most important in the congress of Vienna, Metternich, the representation of Austria. Metternich (1773-1859) was a very pivotal figure. ...read more.

Middle

Castlereagh worked for the establishment of the United Netherlands and the German Confederation. He favored an independent Poland but was compelled to accept a re-division of the country. Tallyrand (1754-1838), previous to the Congress of Vienna, served Napoleon as foreign minister, however when Napoleon was defeated he began to work for the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy. He represented France in the Congress of Vienna. Tallyrand sought to remove France from the stigma of revolution and Napoleon, and restore respectability in the international area. The Czar, Alexander (1777-1825), represented Russia in the Congress of Vienna. He considered himself a savior of Europe. Diplomats were skeptical in trusting him and he was seen as mentally unstable and steeped into Christian mysticism. ...read more.

Conclusion

They had two aims- to secure the victors against France, and to destroy remnants of republicanism. They wanted to achieve balance of power however in doing so, they disregarded the growing sentiment of nationalism. They united different cultures against the wishes of the citizenry; incorporated patriotic poles into a hostile Russia; forced upon the Germans a confederation that was unsatisfactory; and they denied the Italia's a federal organization. They disregarded any principles that were too closely associated with the French Revolution, things such as: equality before law, and equitable taxation. They were completely indifferent to the needs of intellectual and religious liberty because it reminded them of the past horror of the revolution. However this only caused the people to feel the urge to rebel, eventually leading to the future terror of WWI. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. "Compare the successes and failures of Castlereagh and Canning's Foreign Policies"

    To make amends, he signed a Treaty with the French, where it was stated that they would not intervene in any other Spanish colonies, for example, countries such as Argentina, Colombia, Cuba and etc. He diplomatically recognised independence of these states and was hailed as a major influence in the liberation process.

  2. The Congress of Vienna

    Compensation was given to those major powers who fought the wars against Napoleon in forms of land such as smaller states. This increased the level of nationalism for the smaller countries who were now not only influenced by liberalism brought by Napoleon, but they were going to be controlled by foreign countries giving them all the more reason to revolt.

  1. The Religious Right

    Both these fronts are largely funded by the Discovery Institute. The movement's legal arm is the Thomas More Center. This has played a central role in defending against legal objections to the teaching of Intelligent Design in classes, generally using the first amendment.

  2. Gay couples, same sex marriage and Christian beliefs.

    The Federal Marriage Amendment is clearly discrimination towards homosexuality. To argued that marriage should only be a union of a man and a woman is more like an expression of prejudice than any kind of a real argument. The U.S.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work