• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Conservatives and Labour policies regarding the EU have become increasingly similar. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Labour party (new Labour) are Euro-positive. This refers to people who are in favour of the European integration and they still see Britain at the centre of Europe however, they do not want to support further transfer of function to the union. For example, it believes that tax, social welfare and law and order policies should remain under the control of the national government. In contrast, the Conservatives are Euro-sceptics. This means that they are doubtful of any further political integration but realise the economic advantages. They want to see European decision making kept at an intergovernmental level. Intergovernmental refers to decisions that are made in the interests of the individual countries. However recently, Labour and Conservatives policy regarding the EU have become increasingly similar. One way in which the parties' views have become similar is that both parties do not want the European Union to become a federal state. A federal sate is where power is dispersed between federal and state authorities. For example, the USA is a federal state. The two leading parties oppose a federal state because it threatens national sovereignty. This refers to the ultimate power and the source of political power within a state. A European Union federal state would mean the UK would have to give up further national sovereignty. ...read more.


Also Conservatives believe that if EU membership is widened this would stop further integration, and they are against this because further integration means giving up more sovereignty. Another reason why parties are in favour of enlargement is because they can recognise the economic benefit of the expansion. For example the European single market which would increase the free trade exchange, and customers between the countries. Another way in which the parties' views have become increasingly similar is that both Labour and conservatives want reform of the common fisheries (CFP) policy and the Common Agricultural policy (CAP). The CFP gives countries a quota of how much fish they can catch. The CAP is aimed at agricultural farmers providing a plentiful and stable food supply and the maintenance of food productivity in the countryside. In particular, the CAP has proved to be the most unpopular aspect of the European Union's budget, because countries that do not have large agricultural sectors, the UK being the key example, tend to suffer as a result. For example roughly 45% to 50% of the European Union's budget goes to the CAP. In 2007, the proportion of CAP expenditure in France was 20%, with the UK and 9% and others lower. This shows that France and Germany benefit most out of the CAP because a larger agricultural sector, but countries which have larger manufacturing and service sector, do not receive as much support. ...read more.


Labour Described the Lisbon Treaty as just clarifying what powers the European institutions have. In contrast, the Conservatives never signed the treaty because they never approved of some of the regulations it involved. For example within the treaty there was to be a fundamental charter of human rights to be applicable to all member states. The conservatives thought this was unfair as countries should be left to decide their own human rights according to the culture of the country. It also meant that they would have to give up further national sovereignty, which they already oppose. Although there are fundamental differences between the two parties in regards to the EU, the similarities seem to out weigh the differences. Both parties agree on points that have the potential to change the complete structure of the UK, like the idea of a federal Europe. It is essential that both parties are able to agree on these larger and more vital points as an united front is likely to be a lot more effective on an EU level and is perhaps likely to have a greater impact when it comes to making the decisions. Also both parties agree with working with the country's best interest in mind which is an essential element in a democracy, due to the fact that the government is directly accountable to the public therefore the decisions they make should reflect public's opinion. . ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    Paris Treaty The Paris treaty was set up by the European coal and steel community. The Treaty came into effect in the 1950s and the main purpose was to improve relations between France and Germany and prevent future outbreaks between the two.

  2. Has Europe become a federal superstate?

    This came into conflict with the EU supranational policy on free trade and reducing tariffs on members of the EU.

  1. Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial?

    Such is the extent of fraud within the CAP system that it accounts for half of all fraud wastage in the EU budget. It is now wonder that this has contributed to the controversy of CAP as members of the public do not take kindly to the mis-use of their money.

  2. How similar are the Policies of the Conservative and Labour Parties?

    This perhaps shows that the Conservatives are interested in totally changing the N.H.S., this is an area in which the two parties are trying achieve the same things, but by different methods. One of the clearest differences in the policies of the 2 main parties is the issue of Europe and Britons role within Europe.

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    While some banks accused the Commission of having a statist attitude, this is probably more due to the individual perspective, since corporatism seemed to be the main driver behind this regulation. TARGET is the settlement system set up by the ECB to accommodate for both large- and low-value cross-border transfers.

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    non EU NATO members, raising challenge of EU in transatlantic relations and duplication of the efforts. These concerns can be seen as further efforts to consolidate the U.S. positioning in Europe as the extension of its hegemony project Afterwards The German presidency worked very hard to transform the bilateral relationship

  1. Austria - An economic and political overview.

    * An increase in concern and awareness of extremist groups and tendencies in Austria and other countries (would we be so aware of recent events in Belgium with the Vlaams Blok if the Austrian "debacle" hadn't occurred?). It would be hard to find anyone (outside of EU bureaucracy)

  2. An assessement of the impact of the lawyers' establishment directive.

    * CCBE (2002) no title, http://www.ccbe.org/doc/En/tableau_transposition_en.htm [downloaded 20 March 2003]. * Claessens S (2003) "Minder controle op instromende advocaten", Advocatenblad no 4, 21 February 2003, p 148. * Commission of the European Communities (2002) "Recognition of qualifications: six Member States to be referred to Court" http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/qualifications/02-427.htm [downloaded on 28 March 2003].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work