• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Constitution fails to meet the needs of a rapidly changing society" To what extent do you agree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...


"The Constitution fails to meet the needs of a rapidly changing society" To what extent do you agree with this statement Martin McGeown When the Constitution was written by the 'Founding Fathers back in 1787, they intentionally made it so that it could survive over time. They made it flexable so because they envisaged that there were problems that they could not forsee in the future, these are things such as the Depression of the late twenties and early thirties. 'The Framers' intended for the amendment process to be the main way of updating the constitution and through time this has been evident. An important part of a democratic government is the accountability of those in power, in recent times we have seen the system in America fail, in part this may be due to the fact that the constitution may be outdated. During Bill Clintons' second term of office there were a number of scandals that rocked the White House, the first being the Paula Jones affair. ...read more.


This article has been problematic ever since. Within the last decade there have been many high profile shootings in schools such as Columbine, this has led to a stronger fight against the gun laws. There are those such as the National Rifle Association who say that that right can not be taken away from them as it is one of their constitution rights but there is a problem with that as within the preamble there is the mention of insuring domestic tranquillity, can this be done when there are children who can gain easy access to guns, there are also the problems with the number of deaths due to gun crimes, the right to life is also mentioned in the constitution. The flexibility of the constitution is crucial to its longevity as if it was too rigid it would not have lasted, there may be the problem though that it is too flexible. Over the years there hav been many changes in the federal system, most notably the introduction of Roosevelts 'New Deal' which saw the power shift more towards the central government, then there was the move back through presidents such as Nixon and Reagan. ...read more.


As society and its ideals has changed so has the Constitution, when society started to object to slavery and racism the constitution began to follow, the same with womens rights. There are other problems as I have already mentioned the constitution still protects the pro-gun lobby as it is stated in the constitution that all citizens shall bear arms, after a number of atrocities and the significant rise in gun crime, society is begininng to object but still there is no movement on any new amendments in regards to gun laws. The lack of movement may be due to the constitution being outdated but it may also be due to the power that the NRA and other pro gun groups have but we have seen great trides taken through time such as the moves against racism. The constitution was based on what was happening in the eighteenth century and what the 'Framers' envisaged would happen in the future, but there would seem to be the ability within it, due to its flexibility, to change with modern society. Through time we have seen how society has changed and not far behind is the constitution due to the amendment process. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. What problems faced the framers of the Constitution in 1787?

    the rights of the states whilst controlling radical ones and a government which could provide a united economic front as well as issue common policies in a number of areas. It balanced the need for greater federal control with the protection of individual state liberty and the concern that no one gains ascendancy.

  2. The British Constitution

    If EU legislation requires it, the British Courts have the right to review/suspend statute law. Any judgements from the European Court of Justice become part of UK legislation. By being uncodified there is no entrenchment, it can be flexible, broad and general as circumstances and society changes.

  1. To what extent is the American Constitution an elitist document?Why then did the framers ...

    Therefore in this sense it can be shown that the Constitution is an elitist document since it enshrined the desires of the Founding Fathers for stability and freedom from revolution, and since the President who commanded all this great power would invariably be a member of the elites himself, their position within society could and would be safeguarded.

  2. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    Constitution, addresses the duties that states within the United States have to respect the 'public acts, records, and judicial proceedings' of other states. Basically, judicial decisions that are made in one state are recognized and upheld by other states. It also prevents someone from moving from another state to escape enforcement of a judgement.

  1. A Brilliant Solution: From the Founding to the Present

    Rumors spread, speculation was rampant but the proceedings of the congress remained confidential. If not discretion, than only self-preservation kept the meetings private. Overall, Berkin explores each delegate's beliefs, life, and difficulties during the convention. She shows that they were simple humans with some incredible strengths and fatal flaws.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    At short ranges these lead balls could inflict horrible damage on soldiers, as they smashed against a person's body; however, one could not hit a target more than 50 meters away, directly in front. During the time when a musket was a soldier's only weapon, he did not aim his

  1. Power in America. The idea that the rich run America has been encompassed in ...

    Therefore, it is evident that big business is in a good position to control political processes. According to Domhoff, "in terms of access, expertise, and sheer number of appointments, corporate involvement in the shaping of government policy is extensive". Corporate power is strong in America because money is needed for the most political policies to be carried out.

  2. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    been directed at another superpower, for the exception of the Soviet Union, without having been forced into the situation by a direct threat. So is the US a hegemon or not? Mearsheimer claims that "a hegemon is a state that is so powerful that it dominates all the other states in the system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work