• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Contrast between American and Russian Political Cultures: Enlightenment and Despotism

Extracts from this document...


The Contrast between American and Russian Political Cultures: Enlightenment and Despotism Unlike the pluralist tradition in the US, Russian political culture was imprisoned by totalitarian Communism. Gorbachev's policy of glasnost'(openness) - accompanying the 'pererstroika' reconstruction initiative - enabled open discussion of public issues for the first time, with the introduction of the free press.. Russia had long consisted of a culture of regimental participation, whereas the USA has always encouraged voluntary participation. Despite this, civic-participation in America has declined. In Russia the opposite has happened.(Participate America,2004) In America, educational opportunities increased in the 1960's. This increased political participation giving marginal groups opportunities. On college campuses, students had the opportunity to voice their dissent through CND, women's rights groups and anti-Vietnam protest groups. In Russia, the biggest educational change came with the corrupt Brezhnev government, where secondary education steadily increased. This fact was reflected in the workplace and dissent movement. Dissent was beginning to slowly emerge by the 1960's because people were questioning the legitimacy of the Soviet system.(Gerber, 2000) Rejecting the rigid beliefs of the Stalin generation, this generation became more liberal-democratic, and began criticising the government. This is rather like what happened in the US. A parallel that can be made is that the poorer war generations in both countries were more conformist. The younger, better-off generations were more likely to be dissenters - therefore more politically active. ...read more.


One such right, is 'freedom of information'-an important scrutinisation tool in liberal democracies. Unfortunately, this is problematic in Russia. Putin has proposed a strategy to topple opposition. It is not as extreme as the CPSU's monopoly-censored journalism. However, Putin's vow to "control" and "make opposition media impossible" indicates a worrying direction. If Bush were to have and publicise such intentions, the constitutional statute of 'the freedom of the press' would act against him. Most rights reforms took place from 1920-1960 in the USA. In Russia however it was not until the 1990's. The Women's Democratic Initiative campaigned on issues like domestic violence, employment, sexual discrimination,& political inclusion. Only three women were ever in the CPSU, as opposed to the thousands among Republicans and Democrats. The freedom of speech granted to Russians is exactly what the Americans have as a constitutional principle. But this could be threatened by Putin's despotic behaviour, as well as the rather questionable 1993 constitution. A history of brutality has left the Russians with scarred memories. According to recent polls, 'power' to the Russians is associated with military force and physical coercion. To the Americans, power means legitimate authority,status,knowledge and wealth. Legitimate authority, a democratic principle, is granted through free-elections and the implementation of the general will, something that is relatively new to Russians. ...read more.


Stalin's constitution introduced direct elections by secret ballot and universal suffrage but prohibited opposition parties. Russia, unlike America,lacks the 'Enlightenment' ideas about freedom and the representation of rights and interests; essential to democratic society. This possibly explains the low civic-participation. Only a bare majority voted for the 1993 constitution. To add to his worries, President Putin has to put up with ethnic tension in Chechnya and terrorist attacks. Both administrations then have similar obstacles. President W Bush, ever since the 9/11 attacks, has used the war on terror to win over public opinion. An example of the impact of events on public opinion is the fluctuating stability in Iraq. Public opinion in Russia however seems to rest mainly on Putin's strong stance against inter-ethnic violence. To avoid further problems a'Law of Political Parties' was passed against any group undermining state security. Likewise, Bush introduced the Patriot Act to curb terrorism. In both political cultures then, the success of campaigns rest largely on security. In conclusion both political cultures show similarities despite their evolutionary positions in terms of democratic development, notably because of the inevitable baggage that accompanies a capitalist society. However, unlike the US, Russia lacks a precise separation of powers, a progressive Federal system and a coherent and practical constitution. All that is left therefore, is a rather embryonic democracy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the Classical Liberal position with the Conservative position on the issue ...

    People who come from the Clasical Liberal ideology embrace "individual rights, private property and a laissez-faire economy, a government that exists to protect the liberty of each individual from others, and a consitution that protects individual autonomy from governmental power" (Heywood, 2003; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

  2. Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

    modern nation states from being effective polyarchies", they believe that no group can dominate because the modern world actually "allows competitive relations and the diversity of interests to appear (http://econwpa.wustl. edu:8089/eps/othr/papers/0004/0004009.pdf) Elitism however suggests "in the modern world there is little scope for the reduction of domination" of ruling elites (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/APGOV_Power_Elite.htm)

  1. Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

    Therefore it is crucial that all of them including the social diversity are in tact in the state for a pluralist political system. With the Ruling Elite theory however, what is needed for the system to work in that way, is coherence, conspiracy and consciousness.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    The overriding issue of the 1989 campaign was reform, but this did little to stimulate the formation of a party system structure since many of the reform candidates, along with the hard-liners, were still members of the Communist Party. In addition, Democratic Russia itself not only eschewed party status but

  1. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    This evidence is supported, by modern scholarship however there are points of conjecture, which need to be raised. Indeed, the very nature of comparing elections in the UK and USA when exploring the dealignment thesis is fraught with difficulties. The electorate composition of the two countries is very different.

  2. To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in ...

    then succeeded by the revolutions of the Bolsheviks, a group of Russian-Marxist Zealots led by Lenin, they seized power and later became the Communist Party. From the onset the Communist party were faced with a indomitable task, to take a country as backward as Russia and speed up the economy,

  1. Ideology Of Political Facism

    Instead, fascist movements set out to create a new type of culture in which values, politics, art, social norms, and economic activity are all part of a single organic national community. In Nazi Germany, for example, the fascist government in the 1930s tried to create a new "Volksgemeinschaft" (people's community)

  2. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    time employing quantization of both space and time at the Planck scale in the tradition of quantum mechanics. In this sense, both general relativity and quantum mechanics can be thought of as approximations to LQG in their respective domains; thus, LQG is one of the several competing theories that attempts to combine the two into a Theory of Everything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work