• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The difficulties experienced by the coal industry between 1914 and 1925.

Extracts from this document...


The difficulties experienced by the coal industry between 1914 and 1925 There were many difficulties for the coal industry between 1914 and 1925 which I will be discussing in this essay. Industries in Britain at this time were privately owned, mostly by English people. In April 1914 the 'big three' Unions met together to see how they could strengthen their claims in the future. The Miners Federation of the MFGB represented over 1 million men working in 2500 pits, the National Union of Railwaymen (NUR) and the Transport and General Workers Union (TGWU). A Trade Union is a organisation which gives protection for members, fighting for better pay and compensations and protecting workers rights. The Unions altogether represented one and a half million Trade Union members, and were certainly not going to make life easy for the industry owners over the next couple of years. The alliance of these unions meant that they could now have 'sympathetic strikes'. This meant that if one group had a strike then other industries would strike in sympathy even though the problem going on has nothing to do with them. ...read more.


Another key point was due to the fact that there was rapid inflation after the war, prices went up by 25% in 1919 and wage increases could not keep up the pace of the inflation rate. By 1921 members of trade unions had rapidly grown to 8 million and the strength of the unions would make it very difficult for the employers as well as being more organised through the triple alliance. Because of the unhappiness of the workers and the influence by the workers taking control in the Russia meant that strikes were bound to happen. In 1921 an outstanding 86 million working days were lost through strike action. This was the worst amount of work done. Before 1914 the largest had been 41 million which only seems small compared to the 86 million working days lost with the 35 million working days lost just 2 years before. This shows ignorance from the employers as they did not solve the problem after the first strike and paid the price for it. The strikes were becoming so bad that 12,000 soldiers and 6 tanks had to be sent in to keep peace in Glasgow 1919. ...read more.


However, even with these bad terms the coal industry were no longer making a profit and were losing about a million a month. Many miners were also now unemployed because the owners could not afford to pay them. The owners could no longer run the mines the way that they were going so they made a further wage reduction and increased the hours. The MFGB wouldn't accept these terms either and the Triple Alliance was re-joined once again. Something had to be done as there was a clear lack of communication between the employers and the workers. Stanley Baldwin then offered the MFGB 24 million to counter the owners wage cuts until 1st may 1926. However this was only a short-term solution because it would only postpone the problem for the nine months. However the government used this time to try and find a way to solve a general strike if there was one when the subsidy ended. They held weekend courses to train ordinary people to drive railway trains and vehicles. They arranged to take over the BBC to publish a government news sheet and used propaganda to stress the threat to parliamentary democracy from the general strike. Craig bowman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Trade Unions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Trade Unions essays

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    People joined the OMS for a number of reasons. The middle class thought the strike was a threat to them and an attempt to ruin the country economically. Others joined for financial reasons, the Government paid constables �2.31 a week plus food. The miners were on strike refusing to accept wages of �1.58.

  2. 'The impact of legislation introduced between 1980 and 1993 is the principal reason for ...

    The period within which employers can improve their offer to forestall a strike is now more clearly defined' (YEAR). This argument deploys that ballots may resolve industrial action which may otherwise result in a strike. Employers find the alternative of meeting unions' demands more appealing, therefore the threat of action on behalf of unions is sufficient.

  1. Running head: Winnipeg 1919

    (Masters, 1950). The strike of 1918 was somewhat a success for the laborers in the light and power department in the city of Winnipeg. They went on strike for better wages and better scheduling. The committee ended up negotiating with the strikers.

  2. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    Not only this but British coal was extremely uncompetitive since the methods used by their companies were old-fashioned. By 1927 only 25% of British coal was extracted by machinery compared to 80% of Ruhr coal, this proves that the British coal industry was falling behind in the competitive stakes.

  1. There are two broad opposing frames of reference on the role of trade unions:

    Uriwn > 1959, an anti-communist stood against the communist general secretary of the Electrical Trades Union but lost. He took the matter to court and discovered widespread ballot rigging and intimidation. In 1961 the TUC expelled the ETU. > Both sides are wary of government intervention and realise the benefits of Collective Bargaining.

  2. Is the strike no longer necessary?

    feeling that strikes, or threats of strikes, could only increase that insecurity, hence suggesting that strikes are no longer necessary. The uncertainties of the current economic climate also provide good reasons as to why strikes are no longer necessary. The increase in unemployment in recent years has led to a

  1. What is the influence of women social workers in the United States labor movement?

    A special effort had to be made to tell them about union benefits, but once they had committed themselves, women were unshakeable. It was also suggested that women had more pent-up anger in the way they were treated on the job, making them more militant.

  2. Account for the much lower level of strike incidence in Britain in recent years. ...

    Much of the decline in strikes reflects trends in the strike prone sectors. In the traditionally strike free sectors, there has been relatively little change in the determinants of industrial action. The contraction of major basic industries with high densities of trade union members, like coal, steel and ship building,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work