• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The First World War was important as a locomotive for domestic change' (Clive Emsley). How true is this of trade unions and government intervention in social welfare in Britain during the period 1914-1922?

Extracts from this document...


'THE FIRST WORLD WAR WAS IMPORTANT AS A LOCOMOTIVE FOR DOMESTIC CHANGE' (CLIVE EMSLEY). HOW TRUE IS THIS OF TRADE UNIONS AND GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN SOCIAL WELFARE IN BRITAIN DURING THE PERIOD 1914-1922? The First World War introduced a lot of large welfare reform, including the war pension, but welfare reforms had started before the beginning of the First World War, and continued after it. In that sense, the First World War can be seen as a catalyst (or locomotive, if you will) for welfare reform, as it sped up the changes. Trade Unions had been active before the First World War, with the boom before the war helping trade unions to negotiate better terms and conditions, as can be seen in the Miners Strike of 1910. Trade Unions really started to get strong and militant with the formation of the Triple Alliance, when the miners, transport workers, and railway men joined together to become a hugely powerful force. Around the time when the Labour party was formed in 1906, the Liberal Democrats introduced several new welfare acts including the Children's Act and the Education Act. These acts were designed to keep the nation healthy and educated, as it was seen by both the Liberals and the Labour party that these were two major elements the youth of Britain was lacking, and it would be those people that may be relied upon later. ...read more.


This was to ensure those that had lost husbands or parents were looked after properly after the war. This was again another huge example of state intervention. More evidence of the war acting as a locomotive can be seen in the war pensions, which gave injured soldiers' disability benefits. Introduced in 1916, this links back to the Workmen's Compensation Act, but now gave injured soldiers the chance to claim as well. The government saw that health and safety in factories was a large concern, and the government began to employ safety inspectors in 1918. Around this time, cheap factory meals were introduced through internal canteens. The government relied heavily on industry during the First World War to provide everything needed for a war, and so the power of trade unions was increased. They were less threatened as well, as there was no army to break up strikes, as it had been done in Russia in 1917. A huge leap forward for the Trade Unions was the Defence of the Realm Act, as it promised wage increases, showing the huge power the trade unions had over the government. Some workers, however, seemed to feel they didn't even need the trade unions backing to help them bargain during strikes at this point. In Clydeside, there were many unofficial strikes. Workers knew how heavily the government was relying on them during the war, and in 1915 a group of workers took advantage of this fact by striking for higher pay without the backing of their union. ...read more.


He says that some of the reforms and policies were abolished after the war, a prime example of this being that not even half of the 500 000 homes promised for the "heroes" were ever to be built, and another being that the government failed to raise school leaving age to 15, as it failed to supply the funds needed. Also the nationalised businesses were less tightly controlled after the war. When their was the "bust" in 1921 after the "boom" of 1919, the number of union strikes declined incredibly, and it was also in this year that the Triple Alliance split, showing a loss of the trade unions power. This was because of high unemployment; the railway men and transport workers did not want to support the miners strike for fear of their jobs being given to the unemployed. Despite the few reversals on policies, and the small loss of power by trade unions after the war, I still agree with Clive Emsley's view that the war was a locomotive for domestic change, as it influenced so many new reforms and policies, and made the trade unions more powerful than ever before, and completely changed the governments laissez faire approach. The First World War acted as a catalyst to speed up the growth of the unions, and several welfare reforms that helped the working class, and in this sense I do believe it acted as a locomotive for domestic change. Ciaran Sainty History Coursework 1489 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Trade Unions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Trade Unions essays

  1. Trade Unions

    It must be remembered that there are many other issues that a trade union will negotiate for its members other than pay rises (e.g. length of the working week, working conditions, and proposed redundancies).

  2. Account for the much lower level of strike incidence in Britain in recent years. ...

    within the workplace; a reassertion of managerial prerogative so that workers do not strike because of the fear of the costs; and a pragmatic reordering of the workplace such that some of the past encouragements to strike have been removed.

  1. Work-life balance. In this essay, I will be writing on behalf of the New ...

    The proposed legislation would make it easier for women to stay in paid work rather than leaving altogether in order to carry out other commitments. Fourthly, the NZCTU argues that the proposed legislation will in fact be useful to businesses.

  2. 'The impact of legislation introduced between 1980 and 1993 is the principal reason for ...

    This evidence goes against the economic model which states that as unemployment levels decline an upsurge in membership should be witnessed. Lastly this argument fails to account for individual actors behaviour in truth some people do join unions when unemployed, and some trade unions have grown in the supposed decline periods.

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    to be determined by each pit, whereas workers wanted a national pay level. During the war a national pay level had been decided on and now it was going to be written off. All of the good work which had been done during the period mines had been nationalised, such

  2. Running head: Winnipeg 1919

    (Masters, 1950). The strike of 1918 was somewhat a success for the laborers in the light and power department in the city of Winnipeg. They went on strike for better wages and better scheduling. The committee ended up negotiating with the strikers.

  1. There are two broad opposing frames of reference on the role of trade unions:

    In the mid 1960's the recommended procedures to channel conflict and reduce its harmful potential included: * Union recognition agreements * Joint-Consultation and negotiation committees * Collective agreements reached at the most appropriate level for workers interests * Discipline and grievance procedures * Arrangements for arbitration, mediation and settlement In

  2. Challenge of change

    Trade unions encourage employers to resist such a temptation. For public service workers, matters such as pay and conditions of service were negotiated centrally through a process called 'collective bargaining'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work