• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"...the gulf between how one should live and how one does live is so wide that a man who neglects what is actually done for what should be done learns the way to self-destruction rather than self-preservation." (Machiavelli). Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"...the gulf between how one should live and how one does live is so wide that a man who neglects what is actually done for what should be done learns the way to self-destruction rather than self-preservation." (Machiavelli). Discuss. The quote given in the essay title refers to Machiavelli's belief that politics, unlike our personal relationships, is not based on an ethical need to act in a just fashion. This essay will set out Machiavelli's beliefs and then examine them to see if he successfully justifies his method of governing. Machiavelli's The Prince was based on similar works that had been written at the time, all of which purported to advise the rulers of the Principalities as to the methods by which they should rule. These other works generally recommended compassion, generosity and a need to be loved by the people as the main factors for being a successful ruler. Machiavelli disagreed. He looked at politics and took it exactly as he saw it: a world of deceit and corruption, in which even your closest friend could not be trusted to keep his promises to you. According to Machiavelli, "Everybody recognises how praiseworthy it is for a ruler to keep his word and live a life of integrity, without relying on craftiness. ...read more.

Middle

He thus thought that combining aspects of all three types of government after the style of the Romans, and with stable institutions, was the surest way of maintaining a republic at the height of its powers. Just as in The Prince, Machiavelli condones any means in order to keep the republic from degenerating back to anarchy; indeed, The Discourses cover many similar topics to The Prince, but apply them to a republic. Ultimately, whatever style of government Machiavelli is discussing, he comes to the same conclusions: that the ruler must do what he can to maintain the security of the state, no matter what the cost - "...a man who neglects what is actually done for what should be done learns the way to self-destruction..." The political thought of Machiavelli is challenging in many ways: it goes against everything which was generally accepted at the time of its publishing, and even today it is at odds with the acceptable methods of government. The most obvious starting point in criticism of Machiavelli is his claim that the ruler may take any action to preserve the security of the state and to prevent the state from passing its peak on the wheel of fortune. This concept means that there are no absolute moral standards when governing a Machiavellian state - his contextual ethic means that there is no wrong action to take, indeed anything is permissible, provided it can be said to be for the good of the state. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, the reliance on a fixed concept of human nature, a fixed concept of history, and a potentially suspect source of evidence all lead to the conclusion that Machiavelli fails to satisfactorily justify the need for violence to maintain the state. In conclusion, while Machiavelli, through emphasising the need for security and stability, makes a good case for the use of violence to maintain the state, he ultimately fails to justify his theory satisfactorily. By arguing that a constitutional limit on this power would undermine the ability of the ruler to react in context to the situation, Machiavelli leaves the state in a situation where it is protected at any cost by a ruler who must be trusted to do no more than necessary to protect the state, yet who has been advised by Machiavelli to merely act as if he were trustworthy. And the emphasis on the concept of history as a cycle, and on historical examples that are more likely than not biased, gives the argument that the ruler needs these special powers in order to maintain a state at its peak a very weak basis indeed. McClelland says "There has always been a feeling that Machiavelli is hard to pin down in that shadowy ground that lies between politics and ethics." (McClelland, 1996, p154). Machiavelli's ideas are very interesting, and certainly contain many elements that can still be seen in politics today, but without limits and without convincing justification, the implications are simply too fearsome to condone. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    Finally, in terms of decision-making Marx believed in grass-roots democracy whereas in the Soviet Union decisions were made by a monopolistic party-state and enforced using violence, terror and repression. It is obvious that Marxism is linked in with revolutionary socialism, in that he believed socialism would come about when a

  2. Can feminism be thought of as a theory of law or, otherwise, fundamental in ...

    as the underlying economic relationships alter."17 Here it is clear that a Marxist approach would place very little emphasis upon the social question of gender inequality, but would instead focus upon an economic foundation with the speculation that if a high enough proportion of society feel a need to increase gender equality then a revolution would take place.

  1. 'Parties do not matter anymore.' Discuss.

    It could also be argued that parties do not matter anymore because the proliferation of the mass media, particularly the growth of 24-hr news channels such as CNN, and the rapid growth of the internet . These developments have ;supplanted the political party as the main conduit between candidate and voter.'

  2. The argument that democracies do not fight one another is a relatively easy

    Leaders of democratic nations face a higher cost of failure and therefore must handle international incidents with extreme caution, especially when dealing with a situation that could include military force. The use of military force is especially risky because it is difficult to calculate the success rate with confidence.

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    but rather the life devoted to profit making, and the moral reasoning behind the actions of the workers. In their sociological analysis of religion, some theorists focused on social structure as the basic element. Emile Durkheim, for example, suggested that religion, or rather the function of religion was to provide moral social cohesion.

  2. Andrew Jackson: Common Man or Common Scoundrel

    In The American Political Tradition, Richard Hofstadter asserts, "For the first time many Americans thought of politics as having an intimate relation to their welfare" (67). Andrew Jackson capitalized upon this ideological relation growing in the newly enfranchised middle-class and upon its demand for a leader to direct the mass of estrangement.

  1. Niccolo Machiavelli. Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Florence, Italy on May 3rd 1469. As ...

    Many of these works, such as The Prince, were written for the express purpose of getting a job in the Medici government. The second major event was the diplomatic mission to France in 1500 where Machiavelli tried to persuade Louis xii, who provided the troops for the assault on Pisa

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    How can we improve the earth if we are only doing enough to survive for ourselves? Locke's own proviso is vulnerable to a regress argument as it clearly puts the duty to improve and progress to a halt. The idea of taking only enough for oneself and knowing to leave behind for others is questionable as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work