• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The House of Commons avoids the

Extracts from this document...


The House of Commons avoids the "gridlock" to which the US legislative process is prone, but at the price of inhibiting rigorous scrutiny of the UK executive' - Discuss This essay will examine how two institutions, namely the House of Commons and Congress, which are supposed to serve the same process, differ widely in the way they implement and scrutinise proposed bills. The essay will examine the relationship between the legislature and the executive; the importance of the party; and the constitutional arrangements which give each legislature very different characteristics. The French philosopher Montesquieu said that there could be no democracy unless the three branches of government, legislature, judiciary and executive, were separate bodies, which acted as checks upon each other; preventing concentration of power in one branch. Alexander Hamilton, one of the Founding Fathers of the US constitution, shared Montesquieu's opinion and famously said that "[we] must counter ambition with ambition" . As a result the US constitution contains a system of separation of powers, designed, at least in theory, to ensure democracy through equally powerful branches of government. The term 'gridlock' refers to a situation where legislative decisions are effectively halted because there is so much contention and too many interests to satisfy. ...read more.


The SoP is continued within Congress via a division of labour through the CCS, which allows detailed decisions to be made on complex topics, before the bill is returned to Congress for ratification. Based on this it could be argued that Congress acts as an effective legislative body because it ensures good quality bills are passed. For example, Clinton's healthcare reform plan of 1995 was rejected because it was not thoroughly thought out. In this instance, Congress prevented bad and costly legislation affecting the lives of millions. However, the legislative process is clearly a complex and contentious one, with many actors vying for influence and power. At times this can limit the responsiveness of government and the effectiveness of the executive to deliver its policy platform (manifesto), and lead to Congress being gridlocked. This is a major difference between the UK and the US, since the UK government are voted in with a mandate to fulfil their electoral manifesto. The HoC does not suffer from gridlock because the heart of UK politics is very different from US politics. Firstly, the constitutional arrangements in the UK are very different. Unlike the US, which has an entrenched constitution that outlines a separation of powers (SoP), the UK has an uncodified constitution, which does not outline a true SoP. ...read more.


But, the US Congress can appear unresponsiveness at times because of the level of scrutiny. The flexibility of the UK legislative process, combined with the 'organic' nature of the constitution, empowers the government with the ability to make decisive policy choices that can have an immediate effect on the general public. For example, post 9/11 the government was able to pass anti-terrorist legislation very quickly. Other notable examples include the devolution of power to Scotland and Wales. Such fundamental institutional changes would have been much harder to achieve in the US, because so many interests would have to be considered. In conclusion, it can be seen that both institutions have positive and negative aspects with their approaches to the legislative function of government. However, it is unfair to say that the HoC is any less effective at scrutinising the government than the Congress. The real answer is that both institutions place an emphasis on different areas of the legislative process; the Congress placing much emphasis on scrutiny; whilst the HoC places more emphasis on effective delivery of policy. The result is two institutions which go a long way to ensuring democracy, but will only ever be truly effective at all aspects of the legislative process if they synthesise their good qualities together. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Federalism essay

    Of course, it is very difficult to define federalism. It is given that it is a Constitutional concept where authority is geographically divided, and the US Constitution is taken as a model. There is naturally the problem of the difference between what is laid down on paper and what actually happens.

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    Judges in the UK are appointed by the PM with advice from the senior Law Lords, but otherwise there are no constraints on which Judges he selects. In selecting Judges, the President is far more constrained than the Prime Minister, but as the role of Supreme Court judge has a

  1. "The senate is too powerful and the House of Lords is too weak" - ...

    So the Senate has more power but deserves in this as the people they are representing elect it consequently they should hold more power, than that of the British House of Lords. The senate works together in conjunction with the House of Representatives to produce laws and a system fitting with the People of the United States of America.

  2. Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate ...

    ratification the reason can best be stated thus: "Congressman Norris denounced the great combinations of wealth controlling the Senate and nullifying the will of the people. 'The evils of the present system are so great and so apparent that it seems to me this change ought to appeal to every

  1. Federalism vs. Devolution

    that federalism was creeping into the UK in the assemblies but the example of the suspension of The Good Friday Agreement reminds of how strong a power the centralised government holds.

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    The United States Constitution, even according to Attorney General Mukasey in his confirmation hearings, prohibits torture under the Fifth (self incrimination), Eighth (cruel and unusual punishment) and Fourteenth Amendments (deprive an individual the equal protection of the laws etc.). It has been interpreted that the due process rights include barring evidence-gathering techniques that "shock the conscience" (Rochin Vs.

  1. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    certain rights that are addressed in the Bill of Rights have also changed. Some do not really even relate to today. Amendment three for example does not really have any relativity today. Back then housing troops was a major issue but today it is not.

  2. How effectively does Congress fulfil its constitutional roles

    In addition, many bills will be ?pigeon holed? by committees which leaves many bills forgotten. However, if is there to be a united government, a more effective legislation would be provided but if Congress is divided, it is more likely to be an ineffective fulfilment of this role due to partisanship in recent years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work